Connect with us

Civil Society

BERSIH calls for probe into Malaysian Deputy Prime Minister’s alleged attempt to influence Pulai By-Election

BERSIH, a prominent Malaysian civil society group, has condemned Deputy Prime Minister Ahmad Zahid Hamidi for allegedly trying to sway Pulai voters by linking a housing project’s approval to the Pakatan Harapan candidate’s victory in the ongoing by-election.

BERSIH is calling for an investigation into potential election law violations stemming from Zahid’s controversial remarks.

Published

on

MALAYSIA: The Coalition for Clean and Fair Election (BERSIH), a prominent Malaysian civil society group, criticized Deputy Prime Minister (DPM) Ahmad Zahid Hamidi for his recent remarks made during an ongoing by-election campaign in the Pulai Parliamentary constituency in Johor.

BERSIH pointed out that the 70-year-old DPM seemed to be attempting to unduly influence Pulai voters by indicating that the approval of a housing project would be contingent upon the victory of the candidate from the Pakatan Harapan (PH) political coalition in the upcoming Pulai by-election, scheduled for 9  September.

On Thursday (7 Sept), BERSIH Chairman, Thomas Fann, accompanied a BERSIH by-election observer who filed a police report against DPM Zahid.

The report alleged manipulation and bribery after the observer came across a video clip suggesting election misconduct by Ahmad Zahid.

DPM Zahid’s alleged controversial remark at a recent event raises concerns

On 3 September, DPM Zahid, visited the Melana Indah Phase 1 Housing Program near Johor Bahru, where he delivered a speech that raised BERSIH’s concerns of undue influence on Pulai voters.

He allegedly stated that the approval of the PPR upgrading project would be contingent upon the Pakatan Harapan (PH) candidate winning the Pulai by-election.

“Why should there be any hindrance to approving (the upgrading project)? There shouldn’t be any issues.”

“I don’t just intend to present it (to the Johor State Housing for approval); I also aim to observe the electoral performance here.”

If not, the application from Datuk Jafni, Chairman of Johor State Housing and Local Government will be ‘looked at’ again, he said.

“While various requests may be submitted, if the ballot boxes don’t favor Brother Suhaizan Kaiat, I will reconsider this application.”

However, he emphasized that voters should not misinterpret his words.

“Because under the MADANI government led by Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, every promise he utters and every matter brought to my attention will undoubtedly be conveyed to PM Anwar, for its approval in the best interests of the entire populace, including this Melana Indah PPR, God willing.”

BERSIH calls for investigation into DPM’s controversial speech, citing election law violations

In response to the DPM’s remark, BERSIH promptly issued a statement on Thursday, expressing their strong belief that this speech should be subject to investigation due to their perspective that it contravenes Section 9 for undue influence and Section 10 for bribery under the Election Offences Act of 1954.

“Therefore, through our election observers (Pemerhati), we decided to make a police report at the Johor Bahru Selatan Police Headquarters today (7 Sept).”

The Steering Committee of BERSIH further expounded on their position, emphasizing that the DPM Zahid’s speech contradicts the 3C principle (no conditions, no campaigns, no candidates) outlined by BERSIH for the conduct of non-caretaker governments during the election period.

“Any government announcements or considerations made by non-caretaker governments – in the case of the Pulai and Simpang Jeram by-elections, the Federal and the Johor State Governments – cannot be made with conditions, with candidates present or use government functions to campaign, as was done by Zahid Hamidi.”

BERSIH calls on Malaysian PM Anwar to ensure accountability among cabinet members

Furthermore, BERSIH emphasized the necessity for Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim to take immediate measures to oversee the conduct of his Cabinet members.

They called for the issuance of comprehensive Caretaker and Non-Caretaker Government Guidelines during election periods to prevent any misuse of government resources and machinery for campaigning by ministers.

“It was not the first time the DPM has committed such violations. Previously, a similar speech was made during the recent state elections campaign in Kuala Terengganu.”

“Such conditional announcements of government allocations applies undue pressure on voters to vote freely and such campaign behavior are unlikely to generate support for the government. ”

In their closing statement, BERSIH expressed their hope that the remaining phases of these two by-elections and the upcoming Pelangai by-election will be conducted in a manner that upholds the principles of cleanliness, fairness, and democracy.

The Pulai by-election was necessitated by the sudden passing of Datuk Seri Salahuddin Ayub, the former Malaysian Domestic Trade and Cost of Living Minister, at the age of 61 on 23 July of this year.

The campaign period for the by-election commenced on 26 August, setting the stage for a three-cornered contest featuring Pakatan Harapan (PH) candidate Suhaizan Kaiat, Perikatan Nasional (PN) candidate Zulkifli Jaafar, and independent candidate Samsudin Mohamad Fauzi.

Continue Reading
Click to comment
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Civil Society

RSF condemns Malaysian court ruling against British journalist Clare Rewcastle Brown

Malaysia’s Federal Court rejected Clare Rewcastle Brown’s appeal against a defamation ruling, leaving her liable for damages over RM 435,000. RSF condemned the decision as an effort to silence the journalist, who is known for reporting on corruption scandals.

Published

on

Malaysia’s Federal Court has dismissed British journalist Clare Rewcastle Brown’s appeal against a defamation ruling, leaving her liable to pay damages exceeding RM 435,000 (US$103,325).

The defamation suit, which RSF (Reporters Without Borders) describes as part of a broader effort to silence journalists reporting on corruption, relates to a statement in Rewcastle Brown’s 2018 book, The Sarawak Report – The Inside Story of the 1MDB Expose.

The journalist has faced legal challenges ever since, including both civil and criminal cases.

Rewcastle Brown, known for exposing Malaysia’s 1MDB financial scandal, was accused of defaming the Sultanah of Terengganu, the wife of a senior political figure.

The defamation suit stems from a misidentification error in the book, which wrongly stated that the Sultanah, rather than the Sultan’s sister, was connected to a businessman involved in the scandal.

Rewcastle Brown quickly corrected the mistake and issued an apology in 2018. Her legal team has argued that the error does not constitute defamation or criminal libel.

The Sultanah had initially sought RM 100 million in general damages, but the court ultimately awarded a much smaller sum of RM 300,000 (US$71,230) in damages, along with RM 135,000 (US$32,095) in legal costs. Additional fees are expected.

The Federal Court’s decision on 10 September 2024 closes Rewcastle Brown’s legal avenues for appeal in the civil case.

Reporters Without Borders has condemned Malaysia’s handling of the case, asserting that it is intended to intimidate other journalists from reporting on corruption.

Fiona O’Brien, UK Bureau Director of RSF, commented: “This case should never have made it to court. The accusations of defamation are nonsensical. The underlying agenda appears to be to silence Rewcastle Brown and warn other Malaysian journalists away from reporting on corruption.”

In a separate criminal case, Rewcastle Brown was sentenced in absentia to two years in prison in February 2024. She continues to appeal the criminal charges but has faced significant challenges in defending herself. The British government has not commented publicly on her case.

RSF also noted that Malaysia, once ranked 73rd in the World Press Freedom Index, has dropped to 107th in 2024, amid rising political instability and a pattern of defamation suits against journalists.

Continue Reading

Civil Society

Three women to contest charges over pro-Palestinian procession outside Istana

Three Singaporean women, charged under the Public Order Act for organizing a pro-Palestinian procession on 2 February, will contest their charges at trial, a court heard on 18 September. About 70 people participated in the February event, carrying watermelon-adorned umbrellas as a symbol of Palestinian resistance while delivering letters to then-Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Three Singaporean women charged in connection with a pro-Palestinian procession to the Istana will contest their charges at trial, a court heard on Wednesday (18 September).

The defendants are Annamalai Kokila Parvathi, 35, an activist with the Transformative Justice Collective (TJC); Siti Amirah Mohamed Asrori, 29, a social media influencer; and Mossamad Sobikun Nahar, 25, a community worker.

They were charged in June under the Public Order Act for organizing an unpermitted procession on 2 February.

During the court hearing on Wednesday, the trio, through their lawyer, indicated their intention to contest the charges and claim trial.

Siti Amirah and Mossamad are accused of organizing the procession that occurred between 2pm and 3pm along the perimeter of the Istana, a restricted area.

Kokila is charged with abetting the conspiracy by collaborating with Siti, Mossamad, Alysha Mohamed Rahmat Shah, Anystasha Mohamed Rahmat Shah, and other unnamed individuals to organize the event.

According to a previous police statement, around 70 people gathered outside a mall on Orchard Road at about 2pm on 2 February before marching towards the Istana.

They carried umbrellas painted with watermelon images, symbolizing support for Palestinians amidst the ongoing Israel- Palestinian conflict.

The watermelon, reflecting the colors of the Palestinian flag, has become a symbol of solidarity.

Social media posts indicate that participants of the Letters for Palestine event walked from Plaza Singapura to the Istana to deliver letters addressed to then-Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong.

The cases have been adjourned to October for pre-trial conferences.

If convicted under the Public Order Act, the women face a potential penalty of up to six months’ imprisonment, a fine of up to S$10,000, or both.

The police have reiterated their call for the public to avoid actions that could disrupt peace, public order, and social harmony in Singapore.

They advised that while strong feelings about the Israel-Hamas conflict are understandable, lawful means of expression, such as participating in organized forums, dialogues, and donation drives, are preferable to illegal protests.

Continue Reading

Trending