Connect with us

Court Cases

Defense claims Su Haijin made Singapore home since 2017, downplays Su’s high flight risk

In the high-profile S$1.8 billion money laundering case, Cypriot national Su Haijin faces assets worth S$170 million seized.

He’s revealed to possess substantial overseas wealth, while his counsel argues Singapore as his home since 2017, downplaying flight risk concerns.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: On Wednesday (13 Sept), the court heard that the total value of assets seized from Cypriot national Su Haijin, one of the key accused in the high-profile S$1.8 billion anti-money laundering case, has risen to S$170 million.

It was also revealed that he possesses “substantial wealth overseas”, including the property at 38 Oxford Street in London and a yacht in Phuket, Thailand.

During the proceedings at the State Courts on Wednesday, the discussion regarding Su’s bail request extended for more than two hours.

Deputy Public Prosecutor Eric Hu informed the court that Su’s substantial flight risk was evident from the day of his arrest when police officers visited his residence.

According to the Business Times, Su Haijin’s legal counsel argued that his overseas wealth accounted for only about 10% of his assets seized in Singapore. They also emphasized Su’s strong personal and financial ties to Singapore, where he has “made Singapore his home since 2017”.

On 6 September, the 40-year-old was accused of possessing money obtained from criminal activities.

He was also charged with one count of resisting arrest, in which the police statement indicated that during the arrest on 15 August, officers outside Su’s bedroom identified themselves and instructed him to open the door.

Su then allegedly leapt from the second-floor balcony of his GCB in Ewart Park and was later found by the police hiding in a drain. The jump resulted in fractures to his hands and legs, and he was taken to the hospital while conscious.

Suspected collusion with co-accused and uncovered international connections

DPP Eric Hu, during Wednesday’s court session, underscored that Su Haijin faces charges for which bail is not permitted, highlighting the potential for collusion between Su Haijin and Su Baolin, another defendant in the case.

Previously, it had been disclosed that Su Haijin and Su Baolin had close financial dealings related to two Beach Road properties valued at S$2.2 million in Su Haijin’s name.

They were also involved in the acquisition of a yacht alongside three other individuals.

Additionally, it was discovered that Su Haijin possesses passports from Cambodia and Turkey that the police did not recover.

The investigating officer’s affidavit, which was cited in court, also revealed the presence of a Saint Lucian passport under the name Su Junjie on the accused’s phone.

DPP emphasizes Su’s overseas wealth and multiple passports as indicators of “extremely high flight risk”

Deputy Hu stressed that Su Haijin’s extensive wealth abroad and possession of multiple passports were clear signs of his being an “extremely high flight risk.”

On Wednesday, District Judge Brenda Tan denied bail to Su Haijin, observing that he lacked substantial ties to Singapore and possessed the resources to comfortably relocate overseas.

Furthermore, the judge pointed out that the circumstances surrounding Su Haijin’s arrest strongly indicated his propensity to flee.

DPP Hu highlighted that Su Haijin had been less than forthcoming about his complete financial dealings with other suspects, only admitting to them when presented with evidence by the police.

The detailed information about his overseas wealth, as found in the investigating officer’s affidavit, underscored his ability to easily leave the jurisdiction, according to DPP Hu.

Su’s counsel claims Su Haijin made Singapore his home since 2017

Julian Tay of Lee & Lee, representing Su Haijin, contended that his client’s wealth outside Singapore constituted only a small fraction, approximately 10%, of the assets seized in Singapore.

Mr Tay countered the three points raised by DPP Hu, asserting that they were overstated due to the absence of evidence indicating Su’s intention to flee or any preparatory measures to evade court proceedings.

“My client has strong personal and financial connections to Singapore and he has made Singapore his home since 2017.”

He further noted that Su’s immediate family, including his wife, four children, and parents, also reside in Singapore. Tay argued that his client had no intention of abandoning his family to become a fugitive.

“He has every reason to stay in Singapore to defend himself and to reclaim back his assets,” said Tay.

Regarding Su Haijin’s possession of multiple passports, Tay clarified that Su had voluntarily disclosed the existence of his Cambodian and Turkish passports to the police and had indicated that they were no longer valid and inaccessible.

As for his Chinese passport, which was found by the police, it was also invalid, and Su had renounced his Chinese citizenship.

Additionally, Tay explained that the Saint Lucian passport bore the name Su Junjie as an alias, with the second page of the passport, not photographed, displaying the name Su Haijin, as relayed to the court.

DPP Hu countered that Su Haijin’s overseas wealth is not a small amount and would still enable him to lead a comfortable life if he absconds.

In addition, Su Haijin was not forthcoming with the existence of the Saint Lucian passport, and only disclosed it after he was shown evidence.

The police are currently verifying the existence of the Cambodian, Turkish and Saint Lucian passports with the relevant authorities.

DPP Hu added that investigations are still ongoing, as the case is “one of the most serious, if not the worst money-laundering cases in Singapore”, with a huge amount of assets involved.

In any case, the court is not required to conduct a rigorous fact-finding at this stage as the matter still has to be tried, DPP Hu said.

Su Haijin will next be in court on 11 October.

Su Haijiin is among the ten individuals, including nine men and one woman aged between 31 and 44, apprehended during an islandwide raid on 15 August conducted by over 400 officers led by the Commercial Affairs Department (CAD).

These individuals have various nationalities but share a common origin in Fujian.

The other nine accused persons are awaiting bail review at later dates.

Exploring the multifaceted business portfolio and lavish lifestyle of Su Haijin

Su Haijin was reportedly a shareholder or director in multiple companies and had purportedly received S$36.37 million for a pair of adjacent bungalows in Sentosa Cove.

He held this directorial position at the company from October 2021 to June 2022, as indicated in info available on the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority (Acra).

The company’s annual report for the year 2021, submitted in October of that year, documented Su Haijin as possessing a 20 percent ownership stake in the company, As reported by The Straits Times.

Su Haijin also held positions as both a shareholder and director at Aiqinhai Investment, a privately held company limited by shares, and maintained identical roles at Daily Glory International, a mobile phone dealership.

Furthermore, according to a report from Chinese media outlet Lianhe Zaobao, it was revealed that Su Haijin holds positions as both a shareholder and director at Yihao Cyber Technologies Pte. Ltd.

Additionally, he is a shareholder in Meining (Asia) International Electronic Commerce Pte. Ltd. and Sg-Gree, an electrical appliance manufacturer specializing in air-conditioners.

Continue Reading
Click to comment
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Civil Society

Three women to contest charges over pro-Palestinian procession outside Istana

Three Singaporean women, charged under the Public Order Act for organizing a pro-Palestinian procession on 2 February, will contest their charges at trial, a court heard on 18 September. About 70 people participated in the February event, carrying watermelon-adorned umbrellas as a symbol of Palestinian resistance while delivering letters to then-Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Three Singaporean women charged in connection with a pro-Palestinian procession to the Istana will contest their charges at trial, a court heard on Wednesday (18 September).

The defendants are Annamalai Kokila Parvathi, 35, an activist with the Transformative Justice Collective (TJC); Siti Amirah Mohamed Asrori, 29, a social media influencer; and Mossamad Sobikun Nahar, 25, a community worker.

They were charged in June under the Public Order Act for organizing an unpermitted procession on 2 February.

During the court hearing on Wednesday, the trio, through their lawyer, indicated their intention to contest the charges and claim trial.

Siti Amirah and Mossamad are accused of organizing the procession that occurred between 2pm and 3pm along the perimeter of the Istana, a restricted area.

Kokila is charged with abetting the conspiracy by collaborating with Siti, Mossamad, Alysha Mohamed Rahmat Shah, Anystasha Mohamed Rahmat Shah, and other unnamed individuals to organize the event.

According to a previous police statement, around 70 people gathered outside a mall on Orchard Road at about 2pm on 2 February before marching towards the Istana.

They carried umbrellas painted with watermelon images, symbolizing support for Palestinians amidst the ongoing Israel- Palestinian conflict.

The watermelon, reflecting the colors of the Palestinian flag, has become a symbol of solidarity.

Social media posts indicate that participants of the Letters for Palestine event walked from Plaza Singapura to the Istana to deliver letters addressed to then-Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong.

The cases have been adjourned to October for pre-trial conferences.

If convicted under the Public Order Act, the women face a potential penalty of up to six months’ imprisonment, a fine of up to S$10,000, or both.

The police have reiterated their call for the public to avoid actions that could disrupt peace, public order, and social harmony in Singapore.

They advised that while strong feelings about the Israel-Hamas conflict are understandable, lawful means of expression, such as participating in organized forums, dialogues, and donation drives, are preferable to illegal protests.

Continue Reading

Court Cases

New Silkroutes Group ex-director jailed for market rigging; Prosecutors label Goh Jin Hian as ‘mastermind’

Teo Thiam Chuan William, former finance director of New Silkroutes Group (NSG), was sentenced to 12 weeks in jail on 16 September for his involvement in a market rigging scheme. The prosecution labeled co-accused Goh Jin Hian, former CEO and son of ex-Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong, as the “mastermind” behind the conspiracy to inflate NSG’s share price from S$0.285 to S$0.50 in 2018.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Teo Thiam Chuan William, the former finance director at New Silkroutes Group (NSG), has been sentenced to 12 weeks in jail on Monday (16 September) in court for his role in a market rigging scheme.

This sentencing marks the first revelation of case details as Teo is the first among four co-accused to plead guilty.

During sentencing argument, the prosecution has labeled former CEO Goh Jin Hian as the “mastermind” behind the scheme.

Teo, 55, pleaded guilty to six charges under the Securities and Futures Act for abetment by conspiracy over false trading and market rigging transactions.

Goh, the son of former Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong, is alleged to have led a conspiracy to inflate NSG’s share price from S$0.285 to S$0.50 in 2018.

NSG, an investment holding company listed on the Singapore Stock Exchange (SGX) since 2002, operates subsidiaries in oil trading, information technology, and healthcare.

As the finance director, Teo was responsible for managing the company’s accounts, overseeing funding, mergers, and acquisitions. He also controlled NSG’s corporate securities trading accounts and was authorized to conduct share buybacks.

The co-accused in the case include Oo Cheong Kwan Kelvyn, 53, who was the executive director and chief operating officer of NSG, and Huang Yiwen, 40, the sole director of the commercial market maker GTC Group.

Originally, NSG focused on oil trading, electronics, and IT product distribution.

In December 2016, the company expanded into healthcare by acquiring clinics and medical supply companies. These acquisitions were primarily financed through the issuance of NSG shares.

However, in 2017, NSG’s efforts to acquire additional companies and raise capital through private placements were hampered by a decline in its share price.

From January to May 2017, NSG’s share price fluctuated between S$0.70 and S$0.90. However, it dropped to approximately S$0.40 to S$0.50 in June and fell further to a low of S$0.285 in November.

On 29 November 2017, NSG applied to halt trading of its shares, which led to a trading suspension a few days later. During the suspension, which lasted until 25 February 2018, NSG entered into several corporate transactions involving potential new share issuances.

On 21 February 2018, NSG proposed a placement of over 11 million new shares at S$0.44 per share to an external investor, Dr Andrew Chua Soon Kian, aiming to raise S$5 million. This placement was completed in March 2018.

Additionally, in February 2018, NSG announced a memorandum of understanding with Mr Shen Yuyun to acquire two medical supply companies in Shanghai, planning to issue new shares at S$0.50 each for the S$65 million acquisition.

The same month, NSG also disclosed a memorandum of understanding with Haitong International Securities, where Haitong would subscribe to a S$5 million convertible bond issued by NSG. The bond, maturing in two years, would offer an annual interest rate of 5 percent.

Prosecution Alleges Complex Scheme to Manipulate NSG Share Prices Using Multiple Accounts

While trading was suspended, Teo and his three co-accused allegedly engaged in a scheme to artificially inflate the price of NSG securities, according to the prosecution.

The scheme, as outlined by the prosecution, employed three primary methods: using GTC’s trading account to place and execute orders for NSG securities, utilizing NSG’s share buyback accounts for similar trades, and leveraging Goh Jin Hian’s personal trading account for additional transactions.

As a commercial market maker registered with SGX, GTC was prohibited from manipulating share prices. Market makers are typically required to enhance trading liquidity by providing competitive bid-ask quotes continuously within an agreed-upon spread.

Despite this, Teo, Goh, and Oo are alleged to have hired GTC to artificially boost and maintain NSG’s share price, masquerading as legitimate market-making activities. This manipulation aimed to enhance investor confidence and facilitate the completion of announced corporate transactions, as well as support future share placements.

On 4 February 2018, Goh reportedly instructed Teo to find a market maker to support NSG’s share price. Subsequently, NSG engaged GTC between 21 and 28 February 2018.

Goh, Teo, and Oo allegedly set a target price of S$0.50 for GTC to achieve.

Over the course of six months, starting from late February 2018, the four men are said to have conducted the market-rigging scheme.

Goh and Co-Accused Allegedly Discussed Timing and Pricing for NSG Trades

They communicated via text messages and emails to coordinate their actions, including timing and pricing for NSG securities trades. For instance, Goh allegedly urged Teo to place bids at specific times and requested that GTC be reminded of their target price of S$0.50 in an email.

In a group chat, Goh is said to have suggested delaying GTC’s payment until the share price reached S$0.40 by May.

The trading suspension on NSG shares was lifted after the market closed on 25 Feb 2018. The following morning, Teo and his co-accused allegedly strategized to boost the opening share price of NSG to reach their target.

According to the prosecution, Huang used GTC’s trading account to place buy orders during the pre-market routine before trading officially began at 9 am.

On 26 Feb 2018, NSG shares opened at S$0.390, representing a 36.84 percent increase from the last traded price of S$0.285.

Teo and Huang continued to place orders and execute trades in early March 2018 to further artificially inflate the share price.

The prosecution sought a 12-week jail sentence for Teo, describing the scheme as “sophisticated, well-coordinated, and effective” in manipulating the price of NSG shares to facilitate corporate transactions. They emphasized that Teo played a “critical role” as finance director in the scheme.

The prosecution noted that the scale of the market rigging was significant, causing “great distortion” in the market for NSG securities.

Pre-Trial Conferences for Goh, Huang, and Oo Set for 26 September

On the 31 days covered by Teo’s charges, the trades and orders executed by Teo, Huang, and Goh accounted for 28.78 percent of the total market volume of buy trades.

Additionally, they set the intraday high on 11 trading days and increased the closing price of NSG securities on 22 trading days.

The prosecution argued that the scheme was a “concerted and successful effort” to make NSG shares appear more attractive than they would have under normal market conditions.

It was intended as a “quick and convenient way” to support NSG’s expansion and raise capital through new share issuances. The use of GTC was described as creating “a veneer of legitimacy” for their manipulative trades.

Although Goh was identified as the mastermind, prosecutors highlighted Teo’s important role as the main liaison between NSG and Huang.

Teo is set to begin his jail term on Wednesday (18 Sept).

The cases for Goh, Huang, and Oo are currently at the pre-trial conference stage, with the next session scheduled for 26 September. Court records indicate that Huang intends to plead guilty.

Continue Reading

Trending