Connect with us

Singapore

K Shanmugam orders POFMA correction direction on Plan B’s podcast featuring “The Messiah”

Minister for Home Affairs and Law, K Shanmugam, issued a “Correction Direction” against Plan B’s podcast featuring ex-hacker “The Messiah.”

The episodes contained statements that the ministries deemed as alleged falsehoods. Corrective notices were mandated on their Spotify and Instagram channels to clarify the government’s stance.

Published

on

Singapore: The Minister of Home Affairs, Mr K Shanmugam, has “instructed for a Correction Direction under the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act,” to be issued against Plan B, a podcast hosted on Spotify.

The podcast episodes in question (#614, #615, and #616), uploaded on 6 Sep 2023, featured James Raj Arokiasamy, infamously known as “The Messiah.” Raj is a former hacker who was imprisoned for crimes under the then-existing Computer Misuse and Cybersecurity Act in 2015.

Following the issuance of the correction direction on 13 September, The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA), in collaboration with the Ministry of Law (MinLaw) and the Ministry of Defence (MINDEF), identified several statements made by James Raj as alleged falsehoods.

The Correction Direction requires Plan B to post correction notices on their Spotify and Instagram channels to ensure the audience is informed of the government’s stance on the issue. This initiative aims to “allow readers to read both versions and draw their own conclusions.”

The MHA and the Ministry of Defence, in a joint statement published on the Singapore government’s Factually website, provided detailed clarifications against the alleged falsehoods from the podcast episodes:

  1. James Raj allegedly claimed that Singaporean authorities refrained from pressing charges against him due to fear of retaliation. Contrarily, the government states, “It was not due to fear of retaliation as James Raj had claimed. The Police are fair and balanced in handling cases, even if the protagonist has criminal antecedents.”
  2. MHA disputes Raj’s assertion that he was isolated and deprived of human interaction during his remand period, noting, “James Raj’s description of his time in remand is entirely baseless.”
  3. Countering Raj’s claim that he was imprisoned for protesting internet censorship, the statement clarifies, “He was not, as he now alleges, arrested for protesting the regulation of Internet censorship.”
  4. Responding to Raj’s claim of being offered a plea deal on 400+ charges to cover up hacking government agencies, the ministries stated, “James Raj was not slapped with 400+ charges.” They further emphasized, “The systems which James Raj managed to infiltrate were disclosed publicly in the charges and Statement of Facts to which James Raj had pleaded guilty.”
  5. Despite Raj’s assertions that he had penetrated the Singapore Land Authority’s systems in 2013, the statement refutes, “There is no evidence of any breach into the SLA’s systems by James Raj.”
  6. James Raj’s claim of hacking into MINDEF’s systems is also countered, with MINDEF asserting, “MINDEF’s systems have never been breached by James Raj.”

It is said that TikTok took action against James Raj by banning his account, @jamesmessiah, where he supposedly disseminated more false claims.

MHA emphasizes, “SPF and SPS officers neither assaulted him nor denied him any medical treatment when he was in custody or in prison. James Raj received professional and fair treatment, equivalent to that of other accused individuals or inmates.”

Despite Dzar Ismail, co-founder of Plan B, attempting to distance the podcast from potential legal issues by commenting, “So, just to cover our bases, Plan B does not make any claims as to the veracity of the stories told in the episode,” the POFMA correction direction was still issued.

The corrective notices have since been put up on Plan B’s Instagram and Spotify.

Continue Reading
Click to comment
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Civil Society

Three women to contest charges over pro-Palestinian procession outside Istana

Three Singaporean women, charged under the Public Order Act for organizing a pro-Palestinian procession on 2 February, will contest their charges at trial, a court heard on 18 September. About 70 people participated in the February event, carrying watermelon-adorned umbrellas as a symbol of Palestinian resistance while delivering letters to then-Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Three Singaporean women charged in connection with a pro-Palestinian procession to the Istana will contest their charges at trial, a court heard on Wednesday (18 September).

The defendants are Annamalai Kokila Parvathi, 35, an activist with the Transformative Justice Collective (TJC); Siti Amirah Mohamed Asrori, 29, a social media influencer; and Mossamad Sobikun Nahar, 25, a community worker.

They were charged in June under the Public Order Act for organizing an unpermitted procession on 2 February.

During the court hearing on Wednesday, the trio, through their lawyer, indicated their intention to contest the charges and claim trial.

Siti Amirah and Mossamad are accused of organizing the procession that occurred between 2pm and 3pm along the perimeter of the Istana, a restricted area.

Kokila is charged with abetting the conspiracy by collaborating with Siti, Mossamad, Alysha Mohamed Rahmat Shah, Anystasha Mohamed Rahmat Shah, and other unnamed individuals to organize the event.

According to a previous police statement, around 70 people gathered outside a mall on Orchard Road at about 2pm on 2 February before marching towards the Istana.

They carried umbrellas painted with watermelon images, symbolizing support for Palestinians amidst the ongoing Israel- Palestinian conflict.

The watermelon, reflecting the colors of the Palestinian flag, has become a symbol of solidarity.

Social media posts indicate that participants of the Letters for Palestine event walked from Plaza Singapura to the Istana to deliver letters addressed to then-Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong.

The cases have been adjourned to October for pre-trial conferences.

If convicted under the Public Order Act, the women face a potential penalty of up to six months’ imprisonment, a fine of up to S$10,000, or both.

The police have reiterated their call for the public to avoid actions that could disrupt peace, public order, and social harmony in Singapore.

They advised that while strong feelings about the Israel-Hamas conflict are understandable, lawful means of expression, such as participating in organized forums, dialogues, and donation drives, are preferable to illegal protests.

Continue Reading

Singapore

COE prices surge across most categories, Open Category hits S$113,104

COE premiums rose on 18 September, with the Open Category hitting S$113,104, the highest since December 2023. Category A and B premiums also saw increases, while commercial vehicle COEs remained stable.

Published

on

Certificate of Entitlement (COE) premiums surged across most categories on 18 September, with the Open Category recording the steepest increase, reaching S$113,104.

This marks the highest price since December 2023, when the premium for an Open Category COE peaked at S$118,388.

The Category A COE, designated for smaller and less powerful cars as well as electric vehicles (EVs), rose by 2.1% to S$98,524 from S$96,490 at the previous tender on 4 September. This is the highest price recorded for Category A COEs in 2024.

Category B COEs, which apply to larger and more powerful cars and EVs, saw a 3.5% increase, with premiums rising to S$110,001 from the previous S$106,300.

Meanwhile, the Open Category, or Category E, which can be used to register any vehicle except motorcycles but is often applied to larger vehicles, rose by 5.8% to S$113,104, compared to S$106,901 from the earlier tender.

In contrast, the COE premium for commercial vehicles (Category C) remained largely unchanged at S$74,000, only S$1 below the figure from the previous exercise.

The premium for motorcycle COEs (Category D) saw a modest 1% increase, reaching S$9,900, up from S$9,801 in the last round.

Continue Reading

Trending