Connect with us

Comments

Rejected suspension of MP appointment; Netizens question Iswaran’s S$192,500 allowance amidst unfulfilled MP duties

On Tuesday, Singapore’s Parliament rejected NCMP Hazel Poa’s motion, which sought to suspend Transport Minister S. Iswaran from his parliamentary role for the remainder of the 14th Parliament session.

However, the debate’s conclusion hasn’t halted discussions on social media, with some supporting Progress Singapore Party (PSP)’s motion, while others echo the position by the Leader of the Opposition, emphasizing the importance of due process.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: On Tuesday (19 Sep), the Singapore Parliament rejected a motion proposed by Non-Constituency Member of Parliament (NCMP) Hazel Poa.

In her motion, Ms Poa, who also serves as the deputy chairman of the Progress Singapore Party (PSP), called for the suspension of Transport Minister S. Iswaran from his parliamentary duties as a Member of Parliament for the remainder of the current session of the 14th Parliament.

Endorsed by fellow PSP NCMP and Secretary General Leong Mun Wai, this motion aimed to halt Mr Iswaran’s MP allowance, amounting to S$192,500 annually.

It was proposed in light of the ongoing investigation by the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB), during which period Mr Iswaran has abstained from his official MP duties.

In response, Indranee Rajah, the Leader of the House, presented a counter-motion, advocating that the House should only address concerns about Minister S. Iswaran after the ongoing investigations conclude.

Indranee’s motion was approved by the People’s Action Party-dominated Parliament and received support from the Workers’ Party as well.

Heated discourse persists on social media

Despite the conclusion of the parliamentary debate, the discourse continues to thrive on social media.

Upon observing netizens’ sentiments on platforms such as YouTube and Reddit, it is evident that many express agreement with the PSP’s motion, arguing that a Minister should not receive payment while not performing their MP duties, a principle commonly upheld in corporate industries.

Conversely, others align with the stance articulated by the Leader of the Opposition, Mr Pritam Singh, who emphasizes the necessity for the wheels of justice to turn fully before Parliament makes any decisions.

While Mr Singh dismissed the PSP’s motion, he suggested that, instead of parliamentary suspension, a pause in MP allowance payments could be considered.

Support for Opposition Leader’s perspective on pay for MPs under indictment

Some comments agree with the Leader of the Opposition, commending Mr Singh for making a reasonable point and presenting a strong argument.

They believe that Members of Parliament who are indicted should not receive pay but should not be suspended either.

According to this perspective, the decision to suspend an MP should only be made after a thorough investigation has taken place and if they have been found guilty in a court of law.

However, that suggestion is not possible as Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong had earlier admitted he couldn’t suspend Mr Iswaran’s salary, while Mr Chan Chun Sing clarified that an MP’s salary only stops if they’re excluded from Parliament via a relevant motion under the Privileges, Immunities and Powers Act 1962 which is what PSP tried to do on Tuesday.

A Reddit user has proposed an alternative solution that upholds the principle of “innocent until proven guilty” while ensuring diligent use of taxpayer money.

The suggestion is to initially suspend the Minister without pay and, if found not guilty, reinstate and pay the withheld salary.

This, however, is exactly what PSP has wanted to achieve with their private member bill to introduce an amendment to the act.

Several netizens rally behind the “no work, no pay” principle

Many netizens expressed their support for the “no work, no pay” concept, particularly endorsing PSP’s stance that Minister Iswaran should not receive payment while he is not fulfilling his MP duties.

Commenting on YouTube, one netizen commended the PSP’s motion as “fair and reasonable.”

The netizen pointed out that the absence of current legislation to address procedures and restrictions on MPs being investigated by the CPIB does not imply that everything is acceptable; instead, it highlights the need for improvements and amendments to address any existing loopholes or deficiencies in the law.

On the other hand, another YouTube user argued that Minister Iswaran should be presumed innocent until proven guilty, and suspending his pay contradicts this fundamental legal principle.

The netizen suggested that the proper course of action would be to claw back his pay if he is found guilty, rather than suspending it upfront and repaying it later.

In response, another comment raised a valid question: Why should a man be paid for work not performed, along with allowances?

One netizen further contended that Minister Iswaran should only receive the reduced S$8,500 ministerial salary if the ruling government can provide evidence that he is actively fulfilling his duties as a minister.

Continuing to pay the Minister until the next General Election if the investigation/trial persists for years?

A pertinent question has been raised by certain netizens: Will the government and the Parliament continue to remunerate Minister Iswaran until the next election if the investigation or trial against him extends for an extended period?

Such a situation, they argue, would be unacceptable in the corporate world, where if you cease working, your compensation ceases as well.

Several comments also criticize the ongoing payment of Minister Iswaran while he is still under investigation as a “waste of taxpayer money.”

Argument on “innocent until proven guilty”

One comment defends the decision not to suspend Iswaran at the moment, clarifying that it’s not about showing confidence in Iswaran but rather applying the fundamental principle of “innocent until proven guilty.”

The suggestion here is that if Iswaran is ultimately found guilty, the money can be recovered from him.

However, a Redditor raises a valid concern regarding whether there’s a mechanism in place to facilitate the clawback of funds.

He argues that while the “innocent until proven guilty” concept makes sense, there’s a possibility that a reasonable argument could be made that Iswaran did indeed perform work during the period when he was receiving payment, as he still held his title and contributed to ongoing investigations.

This situation raises the question of whether he technically earned the money, making it difficult to claw back.

 

Continue Reading
Click to comment
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Comments

Netizens: 8World News anchor’s defence of Singapore’s success overlooked key domestic concerns

In a recent talk show, Zhang Haijie, a news anchor from 8World News, defended Singapore’s achievements and countered foreign criticisms about its governance. While highlighting the nation’s success, Ms Zhang’s defence of the status quo was criticised by netizens for overlooking pressing issues like the rising cost of living, job opportunities, and housing challenges faced by ordinary Singaporeans. Additionally, some questioned whether Singapore’s solutions could address similar problems in Western countries.

Published

on

In a recent talk show, Zhang Haijie (张海洁), a news anchor with Singapore’s state media 8World News, staunchly defended the country’s achievements while dismissing criticisms from abroad.

In the video published on 12 September, Ms Zhang highlighted the criticisms Singapore often faces from international human rights organizations and Western media, especially regarding the perceived lack of freedom in its governance.

She highlighted how Western countries view Singapore’s democracy as abundant but its freedom as limited, whereas from a Singaporean perspective, Western freedoms sometimes go too far, such as in the case of legal gun ownership in the U.S., which raises concerns about public safety.

Zhang pointed out that while Singapore is frequently criticised for its lack of free speech, authoritarianism, and harsh legal punishments like caning and fines, these critiques are often convenient narratives used to attack Singapore’s system.

She acknowledged that these perceptions are deeply ingrained but argued that Singapore’s success, both in terms of social stability and economic prosperity, speaks for itself.

“Singapore has its own way of defending democracy and freedom; Western-style democracy and freedom don’t apply to us, ” Ms Zhang said.

“As a tiny nation with nothing, we first have to survive before we can afford the luxury of pursuing freedom and democracy.”

In her talkshow, Ms Zhang highlighted a recent article by Graham Allison, a Harvard professor and former U.S. Assistant Secretary of Defense, published in Foreign Policy magazine.

The article, titled “What the West Can Learn From Singapore” poses a thought-provoking question: while Americans and Britons highly value freedoms like speech, press, and assembly, would they be willing to accept some limitations on these rights in exchange for the high standards of governance that Singaporeans enjoy?

Ms Zhang further highlighted that Singapore’s success is not merely the result of authoritarian governance, but stems from the fact that “Lee Kuan Yew and his nation-building team made the right decisions, even when they were difficult to understand or unpopular, which ultimately propelled Singapore to its current heights.”

Zhang cited the 1992 ban on chewing gum as an example, explaining that it was implemented to reduce societal costs and prevent vandalism on public property.

Although Singapore faced criticism for this decision—especially during U.S. negotiations—it reflected the country’s bold and pragmatic approach, she added.

Ms Zhang said despite external mockery, Singaporeans now view the ban as a success, showing how restrictions can lead to better living conditions.

She also referenced Lee Kuan Yew’s comment to the BBC, acknowledging that Singapore has been labeled a “nanny state.”

However, she argued that this governance model has fostered a more disciplined and livable society over the years.

Zhang emphasised “Uniquely Singapore” governance system, which is tailored to its specific needs and environment, including policies like the Certificate of Entitlement (COE), government housing, ERP, and a strong anti-corruption framework.

Nevertheless, Ms Zhang acknowledged that while the Western governance model has its advantages, especially in inclusivity, Singapore’s tailored system has proven effective for its unique circumstances.

Netizens criticise Ms Zhang for overlooking Singaporeans’ pressing concerns, lack of balance discussion

8World News is a Chinese digital portal under Mediacorp, a state-owned media company under Singapore’s sovereign wealth fund, Temasek Holdings.

Despite the supportive comments on 8World News’s YouTube channel and Facebook page reflecting Ms Zhang’s defence of Singapore’s democracy and achievements, some netizens have pointed out that her arguments overlooked criticisms and concerns raised by ordinary Singaporeans.

These concerns include pressing issues such as the rising cost of living, job opportunities, and housing challenges, which have been increasingly alarming for many on the ground.

A comment emphasised the importance of “press freedom” as a reflection of society, comparing it to the necessity of having a mirror in every household. He suggests that just as a mirror reflects one’s appearance, a free press reflects societal issues and concerns.

Netizen suggests 8World News seek diverse opinions on Singapore’s democracy

A YT user suggests that discussing the topic solely from one’s own perspective may not be suitable.

The user recommend that as an individual media platform, the best approach is to invite several guests to share their personal viewpoints, allowing the audience to draw their own conclusions based on a range of opinions.

Netizen asked: Can Singapore’s solutions solve problems in the Western world?

Another comment questions the assertion that Western-style democracy is not applicable to Singapore by highlighting that Singapore’s system is built on parliamentary democracy, elections, a fair judiciary, and a neutral civil service.

These elements, the netizen argues, are essential to Singapore’s success and are not exclusive to Western models.

The netizen further argued that Singapore’s economic prosperity is rooted in the post-war world order led by the U.S., which promoted free trade and provided technology and capital from the West.

He then questions whether Singapore’s model could be applied to the UK or the US, noting that these countries have long histories of stable governance while Singapore is still in its early stages of development.

“The crises faced by the US and European societies are reactions to globalization, such as issues with immigration and unemployment due to industrial shifts. How has Singapore addressed these problems? ”

“For immigration, it firmly denies long-term residency to foreign workers. For unemployment caused by industrial shifts, it opened two casinos and developed the tourism and service industries. Do you think these solutions could be applied to the West? Can they resolve the West’s issues?” The netizen asked.

Rising living costs and employment challenges highlighted amidst growing concerns in Singapore

In recent years, there has been growing concern over rising living costs in Singapore, with many experiencing increased hardships due to policies that have driven up everyday expenses.

Escalating grocery prices, million-dollar HDB flats, and COE premiums exceeding S$100k set records, reinforcing Singapore’s tag as one of the world’s most expensive cities, surpassing even New York.

Last year, Singapore’s Workers’ Party proposed a motion urging structural changes to alleviate financial burdens on citizens, calling for measures to reduce living costs.

However, the ruling party’s proposed modifications to the motion, which the WP strongly opposed, were seen as diminishing the government’s responsibility to address these issues.

On 17 September, The Labour Market Report for Q2 2024, released by Singapore’s Ministry of Manpower, revealed that all job growth was driven by non-resident workers, while resident employment declined by 600.

Time-related underemployment among residents rose to 2.2%. Of the retrenched residents, 55% found new jobs within six months, but 41.4% had to accept lower wages.

Only 32.2% of retrenched residents managed to secure jobs with similar or higher pay. Older workers, particularly those aged 50 to 59, faced the biggest challenges, with their re-employment rate dropping to 41.6%.

Non-resident workers continue to fill roles in sectors like Construction and Manufacturing, which struggle to attract local residents due to the physically demanding nature of these jobs and the rising cost of living.

Over half of Singaporeans polled consider relocating to Johor Bahru to escape high living costs

A recent survey by Singlife found that more than two in five Singaporeans believe they will never achieve financial freedom.

The poll, part of Singlife’s second Financial Freedom Index, reveals significant concerns about the financial future of Singaporeans and permanent residents.

According to the survey, 44% of respondents doubt they will ever reach financial freedom, citing major obstacles such as insufficient income (53%), unforeseen expenses (38%), job insecurity (32%), and debt repayment burdens (28%).

These factors have contributed to a drop in the overall Financial Freedom Index score, which fell from 60 in 2023 to 58 out of 100 in 2024.

As Singapore’s cost of living rises and concerns about retirement fund adequacy mount, an increasing number of residents are considering relocating to Malaysia, especially Johor Bahru (JB).

According to a recent poll by Answers.sg, which surveyed over 1,500 respondents, more than half expressed a willingness to move to JB to escape Singapore’s high living expenses.

Continue Reading

Comments

Tan Kiat How: Police called after resident ‘became aggressive’ at meet-the-people session

Senior Minister of State Tan Kiat How shared on TikTok that police were called to his meet-the-people session (MPS) in Bedok on Monday (17 Sept) evening after a resident ‘became a little more aggressive’, reportedly over a job issue. While the PAP MP emphasized the efforts made to assist residents, some netizens questioned the volunteers’ handling of the situation and urged more proactive measures from the MP.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Police were called to a meet-the-people session (MPS) in Bedok after a resident became aggressive, causing a disturbance, according to Member of Parliament (MP) for East Coast GRC Tan Kiat How.

Mr Tan, who represents the Kampong Chai Chee ward, addressed the incident in a TikTok video posted on Monday (17 September).

In the video, Mr Tan, who is also Senior Minister of State for National Development, emphasised the need for mutual respect at these sessions, which are intended to be safe spaces for both residents and volunteers.

“It was unfortunate that the police had to be called to MPS today when a resident became a little more aggressive,” Mr Tan said, acknowledging the incident that occurred during the Monday MPS session at Block 408 Bedok North Avenue 2.

Mr Tan expressed empathy for the challenges faced by residents but urged individuals attending MPS to remain respectful towards volunteers.

“Sometimes you see such cases at MPS, where one of the residents get more aggressive and can be a little bit more violent,” he noted.

He added that while efforts are made to assist residents, certain matters are beyond their control.

“For example, we can’t write to a government agency to demand the agency to offer a job to a person … but we can facilitate and make sure that opportunities are available for our residents,” he explained.

@tankiathow

It was unfortunate that the police had to be called to #MPS today when a resident became a little more aggressive. We always do our best to help #KampongChaiChee residents, but some things are beyond our control. Let’s work towards mutual respect and ensure MPS remains a safe space for both residents and volunteers. #caringeastcoast

♬ Future – Official Sound Studio

Netizens Question Volunteers’ Handling of Situation and Call for Greater Action from MP

The incident drew numerous responses on TikTok, with some expressing support for Mr Tan and others sympathising with the unnamed resident.

One comment suggested that the individual may have been “desperate” for a solution to their issue, while another urged patience, noting that not all cases can be resolved immediately.

Separately, Mr Tan responded to one user by confirming that he had previously helped the resident’s parents.

Some questioned whether the issue arose from a lack of tact by certain volunteers in handling the situation, suggesting that they receive proper training to address residents’ concerns effectively.

In response, Mr Tan emphasized that his volunteers always do their best and that empathy is crucial in such situations.

Another user noted that empathy should be mutual, suggesting that while residents are trying their best, they may feel they have no other solutions, urging Mr Tan to show greater understanding.

One comment pointed out that something significant might have affected the resident, possibly leading them to drastic actions, and called for more proactive measures from the MP rather than just expressing empathy.

This is not the first time an MPS has been marked by aggression.

In 2018, Jurong GRC MP Tan Wu Meng was assaulted by a 32-year-old man, leaving him with injuries.

The assailant was arrested after rushing into the MPS area and attacking Dr Tan.

Similarly, in 2009, Ang Mo Kio GRC MP Seng Han Thong was attacked when a resident doused him with paint thinner and set him on fire. Mr Seng survived but required extensive medical treatment.

Continue Reading

Trending