Connect with us

Economy

Indonesian Govt bans direct transactions on social e-commerce platforms

The Indonesian government has decided to ban direct transactions on social media platforms with the aim to safeguard data and maintain a level playing field in a rapidly growing digital marketplace.

Published

on

INDONESIA: In a move aimed at curbing the influence of social e-commerce and protecting data privacy, the Indonesian government has decided to ban direct transactions on social media platforms.

This decision was made during a restricted meeting led by President Joko Widodo at the Presidential Palace in Jakarta on Monday (25 Sep).

Minister of Trade Zulkifli Hasan, who attended the meeting, emphasized that social e-commerce platforms would now only be allowed to facilitate the promotion of goods and services. Direct transactions and payments on these platforms will be prohibited. “Social e-commerce can only facilitate promotions, just like TV advertisements, but they cannot engage in sales or accept payments. They are digital platforms whose task is to promote,” Minister Zulkifli explained.

One of the key reasons behind this decision is to prevent social e-commerce platforms from having full control over algorithms.

Additionally, the government aims to prevent the misuse of personal data for business purposes.

These changes will be incorporated into a revised version of Minister of Trade Regulation (Permendag) No. 50 of 2023, and Minister Zulkifli stated that the revised regulation would be signed soon.

The revised Permendag will include a “positive list” of permissible imported goods, and it will specify that imported items must meet the same standards as domestically produced goods.

For example, imported food items must have halal certification, while skincare or beauty products must have approval from the Indonesian Food and Drug Authority (BPOM RI).

Furthermore, the revised regulation will prohibit the sale of imported goods priced below $100 USD or approximately Rp 1.54 million.

Social e-commerce platforms that violate these rules will receive warnings from the Ministry of Communication and Information, and repeat offenders will face closure, as emphasized by Minister Zulkifli.

Minister of Trade (Mendag) Zulkifli Hasan after a meeting with President Joko Widodo, also known as Jokowi, at the Presidential Palace Complex in Jakarta on Monday (25 Sep). (Photo: Liputan6.com)

In a separate development, Deputy Minister of Trade Jerry Sambuaga confirmed that social media platforms and e-commerce, such as TikTok, would be separated in the revised Minister of Trade Regulation No. 50 of 2020.

He mentioned that this separation is essential because each type of platform must adhere to its respective regulations. TikTok claims to be a social media platform, not an e-commerce platform, and thus cannot simultaneously perform both functions.

Allowing TikTok or similar platforms to operate as both social media and e-commerce platforms would create an unfair advantage for them over dedicated e-commerce platforms like Shopee, Tokopedia, and Bli-bli.

The Institute for Development of Economics and Finance (INDEF) has raised concerns about the impact of these changes on Indonesia’s digital economy.

INDEF’s Head of Digital Economy and SME Research, Nailul Huda, pointed out that social commerce has seen significant growth since 2019, as per data from the Central Statistics Agency (BPS).

Huda argued that banning TikTok Shop and similar platforms could hinder the development of digital small and medium-sized enterprises (UMKM) in the country.

President Joko Widodo acknowledged the declining revenue in traditional markets due to the rise of online commerce, specifically social e-commerce.

He noted that this trend has negatively affected micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises (UMKM), as well as local production.

“Because we know it affects Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs), as well as production in small businesses, micro-enterprises, and also in the market.

In some markets, there has been a decline due to the onslaught of social e-commerce,” Jokowi said in the Nusantara Capital Region (IKN) of East Kalimantan, as reported by the Presidential Secretariat’s press release on Saturday (23 Sep).

The president assured that regulations to control social media-based e-commerce would be introduced soon.

“This is still being prepared (the regulations), and it involves multiple ministries, and it is currently being finalized at the Ministry of Trade (Kemendag),” he said.

“Ideally, it should be categorized as social media, not media economics, and that is what will be resolved soon,” he added.

In response to these changes, TikTok Indonesia stated that they have received numerous complaints from local sellers seeking clarity on the new regulations.

The platform emphasized that TikTok Shop was established to assist UMKM in marketing their products to consumers.

While TikTok Indonesia intends to comply with Indonesian laws and regulations, they also hope the government will reconsider the potential impact of these policies on the livelihoods of approximately six million local sellers and nearly seven million affiliate creators who use TikTok Shop.

Senior researcher at the Center for Economic Policy Research (PPKE) at the Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Brawijaya, Joko Budi Santoso, believes that controlling social media-based e-commerce is necessary to protect domestic businesses.

He emphasized that these regulations would also benefit consumers by ensuring the quality and safety of products through certifications such as BPOM and halal certification.

Budi added that TikTok’s algorithms can influence consumer behavior, transitioning them from offline to online shopping due to frequent product advertisements and trends. However, he noted that the presence of TikTok as a social commerce platform has both positive and negative consequences.

While it offers a cost-effective way for UMKM to expand its reach, it can also pose a challenge to those unable to adapt to rapidly evolving technology, potentially impacting domestic industries that cannot compete with cheap Chinese imports.

As the government moves forward with these regulations, it remains to be seen how they will affect the landscape of social e-commerce in Indonesia and the livelihoods of those involved in this rapidly growing sector.

Continue Reading
Click to comment
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Economy

IRAS reports S$80.3 billion in tax revenue for FY2023/24, a 17% increase from the previous year

The Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (IRAS) collected S$80.3 billion in tax revenue for FY2023/24, a 17% increase from the previous year. The rise reflects strong corporate earnings, higher wages, and increased consumer spending, contributing to essential services and economic development.

Published

on

The Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (IRAS) reported a total tax revenue collection of S$80.3 billion for the Financial Year (FY) 2023/24, marking a 17% increase from FY2022/23.

The rise is attributed to the country’s strong economic growth and nominal wage increases in 2022.

This revenue constitutes approximately 77.6% of the Singapore Government’s Operating Revenue and 11.9% of the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). The taxes collected will be used to fund essential services, support social development programmes, grow the economy, and enhance Singapore’s living environment.

In addition to tax collection, IRAS processed close to S$2.3 billion in enterprise grants, benefiting over 131,000 businesses and workers. The arrears rate for Income Tax, Goods and Services Tax (GST), and Property Tax remained low at 0.64%.

Breakdown of Tax Revenue

Corporate Income Tax (CIT) showed the largest increase, rising by 25.6% from S$23.1 billion in FY2022 to S$29.0 billion in FY2023, due to strong corporate earnings. CIT accounted for 36.1% of total revenue collection.

Individual Income Tax (IIT) accounted for 21.8% of the total, with revenue increasing by S$2 billion to S$17.5 billion, driven by higher wages and an increase in the number of taxpayers.

GST contributed 20.7% of the total revenue, with collections rising by S$2.6 billion to S$16.6 billion, a result of higher consumer spending and the increase in the GST rate.

Property Tax contributed 7.4% (S$5.9 billion), and Stamp Duty accounted for 7.2% (S$5.8 billion), though Stamp Duty saw a decline of S$0.1 billion due to lower property transaction volumes.

S$2.3 Billion in Enterprise Grants Processed

IRAS also disbursed S$2.3 billion in grants to support businesses and workers under several schemes, including the Progressive Wage Credit Scheme (PWCS), Senior Employment Credit (SEC), and Jobs Growth Incentive (JGI). These grants were designed to assist businesses in maintaining operations and supporting workers’ employment.

Digital Solutions for Businesses

IRAS continues to enhance digital solutions to facilitate tax compliance for businesses.

Initiatives include:

  • InvoiceNow: This e-invoicing system, set to become mandatory for GST-registered businesses starting in November 2025 for new GST registrants, allows for seamless transmission of invoice data to IRAS for tax administration.
  • One-Stop Payroll (OSP): Developed in collaboration with the Central Provident Fund Board, Ministry of Manpower, and GovTech, this system allows businesses to submit wage-related information to various agencies through a single platform. These initiatives build on IRAS’ existing digital services, such as the Submission of Employment Income API.

To date, over 120 software providers have partnered with IRAS, offering 46 software products designed to simplify tax filing and payments for businesses.

In FY2023/24, it audited and investigated 9,590 cases, recovering approximately S$857 million in taxes and penalties from non-compliant taxpayers.

IRAS aims to ensure timely tax filing and payment while addressing tax avoidance and evasion.

Continue Reading

Economy

Singapore faces 25% increase in bankruptcy filings during first half of 2024

Bankruptcy cases in Singapore surged in the first half of 2024, with 2,334 filings—a 25% increase from 2023. The number of undischarged bankrupts reached 9,903, reflecting ongoing financial challenges and highlighting a rise in bankruptcy orders and applications.

Published

on

Singapore faces 25% increase in bankruptcy filings during first half of 2024
(photo for illustration purposes only/Unsplash)

SINGAPORE: Bankruptcy cases in Singapore surged in the first half of 2024, with 2,334 individuals filing for bankruptcy—a 25% increase compared to the same period in 2023, according to data from the Ministry of Law (MinLaw).

The rise in filings highlights the ongoing financial challenges faced by many in the country.

The total number of undischarged bankrupts reached 9,903 as of 30 June, marking a 2.4% increase since January.

Additionally, 594 individuals were declared bankrupt between January and June 2024, an 11% rise from the previous year.

May recorded the highest number of bankruptcy applications, with 430 cases, followed by January with 409.

In comparison, May 2023 saw 314 applications, while the highest figure for the first half of 2023 was 356 in March.

Bankruptcy orders also increased, with 595 orders issued in the first half of 2024, compared to 537 during the same period in 2023.

Under Singapore law, individuals with at least S$15,000 (US$11,480) in unpaid debts can file for bankruptcy in the High Court.

The process requires a deposit of S$1,850 (US$1,415) to the Official Assignee for the administration of the bankrupt’s estate.

However, this deposit is non-refundable for those filing for their own bankruptcy. Creditors may recover the deposit if sufficient funds are available in the bankrupt’s estate.

Some cases may qualify for the Debt Repayment Scheme (DRS), an alternative to bankruptcy designed to help debtors repay their debts without filing for insolvency.

The DRS is accessible only through creditors and is available to employed individuals with debts of up to S$150,000 (US$114,807).

Those who qualify must repay their debts in monthly installments over up to five years.

Credit Counselling Singapore (CCS) general manager Tan Huey Min noted that borrowers under the DRS typically repay less than the full amount owed, but once they fulfill their obligations, they can start afresh.

MinLaw cautioned, however, that there is no guarantee of significant debt reduction, and any reduction above 70% would be considered substantial.

Despite the lighter debt burden under the DRS, some individuals still fail to complete their repayment plans.

In such cases, creditors can pursue the remaining debt, which may include filing another bankruptcy application.

Additionally, not all debtors qualify for the DRS, and those deemed unsuitable are declared bankrupt.

Recent reforms in Singapore’s bankruptcy system aim to rehabilitate debtors with clearer discharge timelines

In an interview with Straits Times, Yuen Law associate director Tris Xavier highlighted that prior to 2016, the system lacked clear timelines for discharge from bankruptcy, with some individuals remaining in this state for decades.

The reforms now offer clearer milestones for debtors based on their personal circumstances, making the system more debtor-centric.

First-time bankrupts can be discharged within three to seven years if they meet their target contributions, which typically require 52 monthly payments.

Repeat bankrupts can be discharged within five to nine years, contingent on 76 monthly payments.

Those who fully meet their target contributions will have their names removed from public records five years after discharge, while those who do not will remain on public records permanently.

Xavier emphasized that bankruptcy should not be seen as a way to reduce debt but rather as a financial rehabilitation tool.

He warned against hiding assets, explaining that bankruptcy laws cover both local and overseas assets, and the court can reverse transactions intended to shield assets from creditors.

While CPF savings are protected from creditors during bankruptcy, CPF funds inherited by a bankrupt after death are not.

Additionally, bankrupts face restrictions, including needing permission to travel overseas and being barred from managing a business or acting as a company director.

For those in financial distress, bankruptcy is not the only option.

Xavier advised debtors to communicate openly with creditors as soon as financial difficulties arise.

Credit Counselling Singapore (CCS) also offers a Debt Management Programme that negotiates more affordable repayment terms with creditors.

Unlike the DRS, the CCS program requires full repayment of debts, but it allows individuals to avoid bankruptcy, keeping their financial situation private.

Continue Reading

Trending