Connect with us

Singapore

Prof Tommy Koh challenges Lim Boon Heng’s justification for selling majority stake in Income

Prof Tommy Koh challenges NTUC Enterprise’s sale of a majority stake in INCOME to Allianz, questioning its impact on INCOME’s mission and legacy, while Mr Lim Boon Heng argues the move strengthens INCOME’s competitiveness and financial resilience.

Published

on

In a rare public disagreement, Professor Tommy Koh has openly challenged the rationale provided by Mr Lim Boon Heng, chairman of NTUC Enterprise, for selling a majority stake in Income Insurance to German insurer Allianz.

Prof Koh’s response, posted on his Facebook page on Wednesday (31 July), raises critical questions about the decision’s impact on Income’s mission and legacy.

“I am a friend and admirer of Lim Boon Heng, the chairman of NTUC Enterprise. I hope he will not be offended if I say that I am not convinced by his press conference on the reasons why Enterprise is willing to sell a majority stake in INCOME to a German insurance company,” wrote Prof Koh, Singapore’s Ambassador-at-Large at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Chairman of the Institute of Policy Studies.

He emphasized Income’s founding mission, stating, “INCOME was established as a cooperative by none other than the legendary Dr Goh Keng Swee. Its mission was to make insurance accessible and affordable to the ordinary people of Singapore. For the past 54 years, it has fulfilled its mission and looked after the insurance needs of 2 million customers.”

Prof Koh highlighted several key initiatives by Income, including the Family Micro-Insurance and Savings Scheme for low-income families and insurance coverage for children with autism.

He questioned whether a foreign company would have launched such socially responsible products, expressing concern that these initiatives might not continue under Allianz’s ownership.

Addressing the financial health of Income, Prof Koh pointed out that it has always been profitable, posing the question: “In view of this fact why does NTUC Enterprise wish to sell INCOME? Is it because it will make a profit of $1 billion?”

He concluded with a reflection on changing values in Singapore, citing the warning by Singapore’s first foreign minister, S Rajaratnam, against becoming “a nation of people who know the price of everything but the value of nothing.”

Prof Koh’s comments were in response to Mr Lim’s statement during an exclusive interview with The Straits Times on 29 July.

Mr Lim, who was a former Minister of the People’s Action Party, argued that selling the stake would strengthen Income, making it more competitive and able to offer better prices to consumers.

He noted that NTUC Enterprise would receive about S$1 billion from the deal, which could be invested in ventures related to education and health services for the elderly.

Mr Lim acknowledged the emotional attachment many Singaporeans have to Income, formerly known as NTUC Income, as a cooperative before it was corporatised in 2022.

He emphasized the need for the insurer to remain relevant and financially resilient. He cited Income’s declining market share in Singapore’s competitive insurance market and highlighted past challenges in raising capital as a cooperative.

On 17 July 2024, Allianz proposed a S$2.2 billion cash deal to acquire a 51 per cent stake in Income.

The offer, priced at S$40.58 per share, represents a 37.3 per cent premium over Income’s net asset value per share as of 31 December 2023. NTUC Enterprise Co-operative, holding a 72.8 per cent stake, has irrevocably committed to accepting the offer, ensuring NTUC Enterprise will maintain a substantial shareholding post-transaction, ranging from 21.8 per cent to 49 per cent.

Mr Lim addressed several concerns during the ST interview, acknowledging that some Singaporeans might feel emotionally attached to the cooperative model of Income.

However, he stressed the importance of ensuring Income’s long-term sustainability and ability to fulfill its obligations to policyholders. He pointed out that customers buy insurance when they are young and expect payouts when they are old, which requires insurers to have a “very long tail responsibility.”

He also mentioned the challenges Income has faced in maintaining its capital adequacy ratio (CAR) during economic downturns and highlighted the need for the insurer to be able to tap into capital markets for future growth. This led to the decision to corporatize INCOME, allowing it access to mergers, acquisitions, joint ventures, or an initial public offering to raise funds for expansion.

Mr Lim explained that the proposed deal with Allianz would enable Income to leverage Allianz’s global expertise and financial strength, thus enhancing its competitiveness and ability to offer better prices and products to consumers.

He emphasized that while the partnership would introduce a new dynamic, the foundational values and mission of Income should continue to be upheld, and trust would need to be earned through future actions.

Mr Tan Suee Chieh, former CEO of NTUC Income from 2007 to 2013, also shared his concerns over the acquisition of Income on his Facebook.

He quoted Allianz Group CEO Oliver Bäte, who stated in a Business Times article, “We’re not in Asia to buy top line; we want to build a resoundingly profitable business.”

He contrasted this with the values of NTUC Income under his and Mr Tan Kin Lian’s leadership, stating, “We maximised value to policyholders, but they must be sustainable and make business sense. We wanted to have as much reach to Singaporeans, not to maximise profits but to maximise social impact.”

Mr Tan Suee Chieh urged Singaporeans to speak up, saying, “I hope our leaders are making sound decisions to benefit Singaporeans in the long term. I hope things may still change if there is a public outcry. So speak up now or forever hold your peace.”

Continue Reading
1 Comment
Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Crime

DSTA programme manager charged with leaking confidential project information

A DSTA programme manager has been charged with leaking confidential project information, including a S$3 million budget, to another individual. Both men face charges under the Official Secrets Act and could face imprisonment and fines if convicted.

Published

on

A programme manager at the Defence Science and Technology Agency (DSTA) in Singapore was charged on Friday (13 September) with leaking sensitive project information to another individual, including details of a S$3 million (US$2.3 million) budget for a renovation project.

Hsu Yee Chern, a 52-year-old Singaporean, faces four counts under the Official Secrets Act (OSA) for allegedly communicating confidential information obtained through his role at DSTA to Tan Kian Meng, a 46-year-old project manager.

Tan, who worked for a company involved in business with DSTA, was similarly charged with four counts for receiving this classified information between December 2018 and May 2019.

DSTA, the central procurement agency for the Ministry of Defence and the Singapore Armed Forces, oversees various high-value projects. According to charge sheets, Hsu shared confidential details on multiple projects, including tender results and financial evaluations.

According to media reports, Hsu allegedly informed Tan on 3 December 2018 that three companies had failed in their bids for a project to renovate toilets in four blocks along Clementi Loop.

On 12 March 2019, Hsu disclosed to Tan that DSTA’s budget for a power upgrading and renovation project at Stagmont Road was S$3 million. The following month, on 5 April 2019, Hsu provided Tan with confidential findings on a company’s tender price and cable size for the Stagmont Road project.

Additionally, on 3 May 2019, Hsu allegedly shared with Tan information about a construction company’s poor financial health in relation to its bid for addition and alteration works on four blocks at Sungei Gedong Road.

The Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) confirmed the details of these charges in a statement. Both men are currently out on S$10,000 bail, with Tan’s next court appearance scheduled for 20 September, while Hsu is due to return on 11 October.

If convicted under the OSA, they could face imprisonment of up to two years, a fine of up to S$2,000, or both.

Continue Reading

Food

SFA recalled popular durian mooncakes over excessive bacteria levels

As part of its regulatory sampling, the Singapore Food Agency (SFA) detected Bacillus cereus in Four Seasons Durian’s Mini D24 Durian Mooncake, exceeding permitted levels. The product has been recalled. B. cereus, commonly found in the environment, can cause food poisoning, with symptoms including nausea, vomiting, and diarrhoea.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: A popular brand of durian mooncakes is being recalled after exceeding Singapore’s food safety standards for bacteria levels.

The Singapore Food Agency (SFA) announced on Thursday (12 September) that all batches of Four Seasons Durian’s mini D24 durian mooncakes have been affected.

The SFA detected the presence of Bacillus cereus (B. cereus) bacteria in the mooncakes as part of its regular sampling of mooncakes for food safety checks.

B. cereus is commonly found in the environment as well as in the intestinal tracts of insects and mammals.

It is a known cause of food poisoning, typically leading to symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, stomach cramps, and diarrhoea.

The agency has advised customers not to consume the affected mooncakes.

Those who have already consumed the product and are concerned about their health should seek medical advice immediately.

Customers can also contact the place where they purchased the mooncakes for further inquiries.

The SFA continues to monitor the situation to ensure food safety standards are upheld.

Continue Reading

Trending