Connect with us

Food

NTU stall food prices questioned after parent pays S$6.30 for meal

A parent has raised concerns about high food prices at NTU after paying S$6.30 for a meal at a campus food court, questioning the financial burden on students. The stall owner clarified that her stall offers Chinese-style stir-fry dishes, not typical economy rice, resulting in higher costs. Netizens noted both concerns about meal affordability and the pressures faced by hawkers, including rising costs and rental expenses.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: A parent has raised concerns about the high food prices at Nanyang Technological University (NTU), particularly after paying S$6.30 for a meal at the NTU Hall 2 food court.

She expressed worries about the financial burden on students and their access to affordable meals.

However, the stall owner clarified in an interview with local media that her stall is not a typical economy rice (‘cai fan’) stall but rather offers Chinese-style stir-fry dishes. As a result, the cost of her ingredients is higher.

Fen, a concerned parent, earlier complained to online media outlet Stomp about being charged S$6.30 for a cai fan at a stall in the campus on 21 August.

The meal, consisting of economy rice with pork, egg, and brinjal, cost S$1.50 each for vegetables, S$2.50 for pork, and S$0.80 for rice.

She highlighted that NTU students might face higher daily lunch costs compared to outside options, citing that a similar meal with one meat and two vegetables costs S$2.90 at a coffee shop in Bedok.

Fen also expressed dissatisfaction with the S$4.75 sausage baked rice from another stall, describing it as unappetising.

“Generally, food at NTU is not as good as the old days when workers from nearby factories and offices would drive in to have their lunches there, ” Fen remarked.

She expressed concern that students might struggle to access decent and affordable food on campus, especially if they lack the time to travel elsewhere and must rely on the limited food options available.

Stall owner’s explanation

In response to these concerns, stall owner Ms. Li, who has been operating since 8 August, provided an explanation.

In an interview with Chinese media Shin Min Daily News, Ms Li clarified that her stall specializes in Chinese stir-fry dishes rather than traditional economy rice (‘cai fan’), which results in higher ingredient costs.

She also mentioned that, in addition to pork, her stall offers mutton at S$2.50 per portion, as well as beef and seafood at S$3 per portion.

Ms Li emphasised that the prices are not considered excessive and are clearly indicated.

Her stall also provides free soup and extra rice at no additional charge.

She added that the mala hotpot does not incur a base charge and that she uses a more expensive variety of rice imported from China.

Comments reveal concerns about student meal affordability and acknowledge hawkers’ pressures amid rising costs

Despite Ms Li’s defence, some students and netizens remain skeptical about the pricing.

Comments on Stomp and Zaobao’s Facebook posts reveal that while there is concern about the affordability of meals for students, some also recognize the pressures faced by hawkers, including rental costs and the rising cost of food materials.

There is a sentiment that NTU’s administration is out of touch with students’ needs and should better monitor welfare and food pricing.

A netizen suggested that if rental costs are a factor, it might be time for universities to investigate these issues.

There are comments suggesting that NTU’s food prices are indeed high.

 A netizen noted that as an educational institution, NTU should ensure that food prices are more affordable for students, ideally cheaper than options outside the campus, and suggesting that  The Ministry of Education (MOE) should look into this to safeguard students’ welfare.

While some netizens believe the pricing is still reasonable, others acknowledge the financial pressures faced by businesses due to high rents in Singapore.

A comment on Zaobao’s Facebook post noted: “Currently, rents in Singapore are high for everything. Is anyone providing services for free? It’s hard to understand how vendors can sell cai fan without making a profit. “

“Sometimes, consumers need to appreciate the difficulties faced by business owners. It often feels like people are accusing them of making too much money. Everyone needs to make a living. I think S$6.30 is quite normal.”

Another comment echoed similar sentiments: “The cai fan vendors are really pitiful; they’re criticized all day long. Do they not have to pay rent, utilities, or wages for their workers?”

Some disagreed with the stall owner’s explanation, noting that the issue lies in how the product is positioned.

A comment pointed out that stir-fry is typically cooked dish by dish to maintain freshness and optimal temperature, which justifies higher prices.

In contrast, cai fan is prepared in bulk and kept on display, compromising freshness and temperature, thus leading to lower prices.

One netizen stated: “Which cai fan isn’t stir-fried in a Chinese style? Cai fan is just about choosing from a selection of dishes. Cai fan is simply cai fan; there’s no need to compare it to Chinese stir-fry dishes.”
Continue Reading
24 Comments
Subscribe
Notify of
24 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Food

SFA recalled popular durian mooncakes over excessive bacteria levels

As part of its regulatory sampling, the Singapore Food Agency (SFA) detected Bacillus cereus in Four Seasons Durian’s Mini D24 Durian Mooncake, exceeding permitted levels. The product has been recalled. B. cereus, commonly found in the environment, can cause food poisoning, with symptoms including nausea, vomiting, and diarrhoea.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: A popular brand of durian mooncakes is being recalled after exceeding Singapore’s food safety standards for bacteria levels.

The Singapore Food Agency (SFA) announced on Thursday (12 September) that all batches of Four Seasons Durian’s mini D24 durian mooncakes have been affected.

The SFA detected the presence of Bacillus cereus (B. cereus) bacteria in the mooncakes as part of its regular sampling of mooncakes for food safety checks.

B. cereus is commonly found in the environment as well as in the intestinal tracts of insects and mammals.

It is a known cause of food poisoning, typically leading to symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, stomach cramps, and diarrhoea.

The agency has advised customers not to consume the affected mooncakes.

Those who have already consumed the product and are concerned about their health should seek medical advice immediately.

Customers can also contact the place where they purchased the mooncakes for further inquiries.

The SFA continues to monitor the situation to ensure food safety standards are upheld.

Continue Reading

Community

SGH food court’s S$7.30 tom yum soup underwhelms diners

In a gastronomic saga at Singapore General Hospital’s food court, a diner’s lament over his S$7.30 Tom Yum soup, featuring a meager serving of three prawns and one lonely sotong, has ignited a discussion about escalating food court prices in Singapore.

Published

on

By

SINGAPORE: The relentless grip of inflation has gradually elevated the cost of even food court indulgences, inciting frequent customer discontent regarding perceived value for money.

Recently, a discerning diner shared his experience, revealing a rather meager offering of three prawns and a solitary piece of sotong in his S$7.30 (US$5.4) tom yum soup from the food court within Singapore General Hospital (SGH).

The disappointed patron lamented that his meal was a far cry from being a worthy investment.

In a Facebook post shared within the Complaint Singapore Unrestricted group on Monday (4 Sep), the man expressed his dissatisfaction, deeming his meal as “absolutely not worth it”.

tom yum

(Photo: Facebook/Complaint Singapore Unrestricted)

His culinary journey led him to the newly inaugurated Koufu food court within SGH, where he placed his order at the “Telur Thai” stall.

Promising an authentic Thai culinary experience prepared by skilled Thai chefs, the stall had garnered his interest.

The critique began with the revelation of just three diminutive prawns and a single sotong for the hefty price of S$7.30 (US$5.4).

What further soured his experience was the prawns’ less-than-optimal freshness, evidenced by their tendency to crumble and shed their shells upon touch.

The diner’s disapproval extended to the tom yum soup itself, as he found its portion to be significantly lacking, filling barely half the container.

Moreover, a third seemed to be nothing but oil, a revelation that he found particularly unappetizing.

In unequivocal terms, he described the entire experience as “revolting” and pledged never to return to the aforementioned stall.

When urged to lodge a complaint, the diner expressed scepticism, asserting that it would likely prove futile.

He attributed the size of the prawns to decisions made by the franchise holder, absolving the local staff of any influence.

complain

The diner’s plight resonated with fellow netizens, with some pointing out the surprisingly steep prices at hospital food courts, rivalling even those at upscale locations such as Orchard and the airport.

comment comment

Continue Reading

Trending