Connect with us

Business

WP Engine banned from WordPress.org amid escalating legal fight with Matt Mullenweg

Following Matt Mullenweg’s ban on WP Engine from accessing WordPress.org resources, many WP Engine customers are left vulnerable, as they can no longer access plugin updates or security features. Mullenweg urged users to seek alternative hosts, escalating the legal conflict between the two companies.

Published

on

In a sharp escalation of tensions, WordPress co-founder and CEO Matt Mullenweg has publicly criticized WP Engine, a popular hosting provider, while also cutting its access to WordPress.org’s resources.

The dispute centres on legal and trademark issues, with Mullenweg accusing WP Engine of both profiteering off WordPress’s open-source platform and damaging its community.

On 25 September, Mullenweg posted a scathing blog on WordPress.org, stating that WP Engine no longer has free access to the platform’s resources and calling for customers to avoid the service.

He also detailed that WP Engine’s recent actions disrupted thousands of websites. “WP Engine broke thousands of customer sites yesterday in their haphazard attempt to block our attempts to inform the wider WordPress community,” Mullenweg claimed.

The conflict appears rooted in WP Engine’s use of WordPress’s open-source platform while allegedly not contributing to its development or upholding community standards.

At the core of the dispute is WP Engine’s practice of locking down a WordPress feature that tracks revision history for posts. According to Mullenweg, this undermines a crucial aspect of WordPress’s promise of data transparency and protection.

WP Engine, in turn, has argued that Mullenweg is trying to coerce them into paying millions to license the WordPress trademark, a claim Mullenweg denies.

The host provider WP Engine has faced harsh criticism for disabling certain features in WordPress core, which, according to Mullenweg, is central to protecting user data.

“WP Engine wants to control your WordPress experience,” Mullenweg wrote, accusing the company of exploiting WordPress’s free services while making billions of dollars in revenue.

WP Engine’s inability to provide security updates and other resources leaves customers vulnerable, Mullenweg suggested, urging users to consider alternative hosting options.

Additionally, Mullenweg argued that WP Engine would need to replicate WordPress’s security infrastructure independently.

He emphasized that WordPress.org has collaborated with hosting providers to address vulnerabilities at the network layer, a service WP Engine can no longer access freely. “Why should WordPress.org provide these services to WP Engine for free, given their attacks on us?” he asked.

The ban leaves WP Engine in a precarious position, as customers who rely on WordPress plugins and themes may face significant difficulties accessing the latest updates.

These restrictions have raised alarms in the community, as outdated plugins are often the target of cyberattacks. Hackers frequently exploit vulnerabilities in WordPress plugins, potentially compromising millions of websites globally.

The dispute between WordPress and WP Engine has been simmering for some time.

Earlier in September, Mullenweg described WP Engine as a “cancer to WordPress” during a speech at the WordCamp US Summit, accusing the company of profiting off the platform without giving back.

In response, WP Engine sent a cease-and-desist letter to Mullenweg and Automattic, claiming that Mullenweg’s comments were an attempt to extort the company into paying for a trademark license.

WP Engine’s legal team also accused Mullenweg of threatening a “scorched earth nuclear approach” if they refused to comply with his demands.

The cease-and-desist letter was swiftly countered by Automattic, WordPress’s parent company, which asserted that WP Engine had violated WordPress and WooCommerce trademark policies.

The updated trademark policy on WordPress.org explicitly cautions users against assuming WP Engine is affiliated with WordPress. “Many people think WP Engine is ‘WordPress Engine’ and officially associated with WordPress, which it’s not,” the updated guidelines explain.

The legal dispute has thrown both companies and their customers into uncertainty.

While WordPress operates under a GPL (General Public License), which makes the software free for use, hosting providers like WP Engine must offer services beyond the core platform, such as user login systems, update servers, and security monitoring.

Mullenweg’s decision to sever WP Engine’s access to WordPress.org resources has already caused disruption, with many sites reporting functionality issues and concerns about security vulnerabilities.

WP Engine has pushed back against Mullenweg’s actions.

In a public statement, the company accused Mullenweg of abusing his influence over WordPress to disrupt WP Engine customers’ access to WordPress.org, calling the move “unprecedented and unwarranted.”

The company argued that the ban affected not only its users but also developers who rely on WP Engine’s tools to build and maintain WordPress plugins.

As the dispute unfolds, the wider WordPress community is left to grapple with the implications. Developers and hosting providers have expressed concern over the trademark battle, fearing that similar restrictions could extend to them.

The WordPress Foundation, which holds the trademark, has already filed to trademark “Managed WordPress” and “Hosted WordPress,” sparking debate about how this might affect commercial users.

For now, the WordPress ecosystem is in flux as users, developers, and hosting providers wait to see how the legal battle will unfold and whether WP Engine will regain access to critical WordPress.org resources.

Until then, Mullenweg’s message is clear: if you want the true WordPress experience, WP Engine is no longer the place to find it.

Editor’s note: This publication was previously hosted on WP Engine.

Continue Reading
2 Comments
Subscribe
Notify of
2 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Business

DPM Gan Kim Yong appointed to GIC board as director

Deputy Prime Minister Gan Kim Yong will join the GIC board as a director from 1 October, enhancing his extensive portfolio that includes serving as Singapore’s Minister for Trade and Industry and Chairman of the Monetary Authority of Singapore.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Deputy Prime Minister (DPM) Gan Kim Yong will join the GIC board as a director starting on 1 October, according to an announcement from the sovereign wealth fund on Tuesday (24 September).

Mr Gan is also Singapore’s Minister for Trade and Industry.

His appointment adds to his extensive portfolio, which already includes his responsibilities as the Chairman of the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) and his role overseeing the Strategy Group in the Prime Minister’s Office.

He is also a member of key national boards such as the Research, Innovation, and Enterprise Council and the National Research Foundation Board.

In a statement, Lim Chow Kiat, Chief Executive of GIC, welcomed Gan’s appointment, stating, “His wide-ranging experience will add valuable insights to important asset allocation and other strategic decisions.”

Lim expressed optimism about the contributions Gan will make to the board in shaping GIC’s investment strategies.

Gan’s career began in Singapore’s Civil Service, where he worked in the Ministry of Trade and Industry and the Ministry of Home Affairs.

In 1989, he transitioned to the private sector, joining NatSteel, a company that produces reinforcement steel products for the construction industry.

During his time at NatSteel, Gan rose to the position of Chief Executive Officer and President in 2005. His leadership at the company spanned several years, during which he contributed significantly to its development.

In addition to his corporate experience, Gan has had a distinguished political career.

He entered politics in 2001 and has since held various ministerial roles, including positions in the Ministry of Education, the Ministry of Manpower, and the Ministry of Health.

His leadership in these ministries contributed to Singapore’s policy development in areas ranging from workforce management to public health.

Gan holds both Bachelor’s and Master’s degrees in Engineering from Cambridge University.

Continue Reading

Business

Taiwan’s FSC rejects CTBC Financial’s bid to acquire Shin Kong Financial, favoring Taishin’s merger plans

Taiwan’s Financial Supervisory Commission rejected CTBC Financial’s tender offer to acquire Shin Kong Financial, raising concerns about its plan, while Taishin Financial moves closer to a merger with Shin Kong. Both companies have scheduled shareholder meetings for 9 October.

Published

on

On 16 September 2024, Taiwan’s Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) rejected an application from CTBC Financial Holding Co. to launch a tender offer for Shin Kong Financial Holding Co., potentially clearing the path for Taishin Financial Holding Co. to proceed with its proposed merger with Shin Kong Financial.

Jean Chiu, vice chairperson of the FSC, stated at a press conference that CTBC Financial failed to provide a comprehensive implementation plan for the acquisition. CTBC had proposed acquiring between 10% and 51% of Shin Kong Financial’s shares initially, with plans to later fully integrate the company.

However, the FSC raised concerns over CTBC’s lack of detailed provisions on how it would manage various potential outcomes, particularly if it failed to secure full control of Shin Kong.

Additionally, the FSC highlighted gaps in CTBC’s understanding of the financial health of Shin Kong’s life insurance subsidiary, as well as a lack of firm commitments regarding raising the capital size of this subsidiary.

This uncertainty, combined with the method of payment proposed by CTBC—using a mix of cash and its own stock—raised concerns that the tender offer could negatively affect shareholders due to potential fluctuations in CTBC’s stock price during the transaction process.

CTBC’s proposal, announced on 20 August, included an offer of NT$4.09 (US$0.13) per share in cash and an exchange of 0.3132 CTBC shares for each Shin Kong share, amounting to NT$14.55 (US$0.46) per share. This bid was labeled by Taishin Financial as a hostile takeover attempt, as Shin Kong Financial’s board had not approved the offer.

In response, Taishin Financial, which has been vying for Shin Kong through a merger, revised its stock swap offer on 11 September.

The new offer included 0.672 Taishin shares plus 0.175 preferred shares for each Shin Kong share, translating to NT$14.18 per share—closer to CTBC’s offer. Taishin had earlier disclosed on 22 August its original plan to offer 0.6022 shares of its stock per Shin Kong share, which amounted to NT$11.32 (US$0.36).

Chiu emphasized that tender offers based on stock payments are rare in Taiwan, with only six cases since the 2002 revision of tender offer regulations.

She referenced Fubon Financial Holding’s acquisition of Jih Sun Financial in 2023, where cash was used instead of shares, to highlight how tender offers have traditionally been handled in the local market.

Chiu concluded by stating that although Taiwan’s financial market operates on free-market principles, takeovers should avoid disrupting market order and respect corporate stability.

Taishin Financial and Shin Kong Financial are set to hold a special general meeting on 9 October to secure shareholder approval for their merger plan, which will then require the FSC’s endorsement.

Continue Reading

Trending