Connect with us

Labour

Dsyon surprise layoffs spark union dissapointment and netizen outrage

Dyson’s surprise layoffs in Singapore on 1 October sparked outrage among netizens, who criticized the company’s practices and questioned union effectiveness. UWEEI expressed disappointment over insufficient notice, while employees remain concerned about further cuts despite Dyson’s reassurances.

Published

on

Dyson, the UK-based technology company, conducted an unexpected round of layoffs in Singapore on Tuesday (1 Oct), leaving many employees shocked and morale at an all-time low.

According to Channel News Asia, the layoffs come just three months after Dyson had assured staff that its Singapore operations, which serve as its global headquarters, would be unaffected by a global restructuring that had cut 1,000 jobs in Britain.

According to employees, the retrenchment exercise was carried out discreetly, with affected workers receiving email notifications for private “one-on-one” meetings.

These meetings, attended by human resources representatives, informed employees that their roles had been made redundant. One laid-off worker, speaking anonymously, shared that employees were unaware of who had been called into the meetings.

“We saw lots of envelopes, and people quietly packing up their things. It was surreal,” the employee said. Another worker confirmed that the layoffs affected staff in manufacturing and procurement, but neither could specify the total number of employees let go.

The layoffs have created a tense atmosphere in Dyson’s Singapore office, where many are concerned about the possibility of further retrenchments.

“People are shocked and have low morale. No one knows if more cuts are coming next week,” an employee noted, citing Dyson’s history of phasing layoffs, as seen in its July cuts in Britain.

A Dyson spokesperson responded to media inquiries by stating that the company was adjusting its team composition to ensure it had the right skills in place for future growth.

“Our ambitions in Singapore remain unchanged, and we expect to continue growing here in the medium term,” the spokesperson said. Dyson did not, however, disclose the number of employees laid off or provide specifics on how the company plans to support the affected staff.

Union criticise lack of notice

The United Workers of Electronics and Electrical Industries (UWEEI), an affiliate of the National Trades Union Congress (NTUC), expressed disappointment at the limited notice provided before the layoffs. UWEEI revealed that it was informed only one day before the retrenchment, which left little room for meaningful discussions. The union has escalated the matter to the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) for further review.

While the union acknowledged that those affected fall outside its scope of representation under its agreement with Dyson, it pledged to support the laid-off employees in collaboration with NTUC’s Employment and Employability Institute (e2i).

UWEEI and e2i will assist with job searches, career coaching, and retraining. The union also called on companies to adhere to NTUC’s Fair Retrenchment Framework, emphasizing the need to protect local workers and ensure that adequate support is given during layoffs.

When asked to respond to the union’s statement, Dyson said it had “respectfully informed UWEEI in advance” and was following all MOM guidelines. The company is offering employment assistance programs (EAP), including outplacement services and counseling for affected employees.

Dyson’s presence in Singapore

Dyson, best known for its vacuum cleaners, has been operating in Singapore since 2007. It designated Singapore as its global headquarters in 2019, and the city-state serves as a hub for Dyson’s research, engineering, and manufacturing operations.

The company produces its patented digital motors in Jurong, where a new motor is made every two seconds. Dyson is also investing in a high-tech battery manufacturing plant in Tuas, set to open by 2025. In 2022, Dyson announced plans to invest S$1.5 billion in its Singapore operations over the next four years, and as of 2023, employed over 1,920 people.

Despite this long-standing presence, the layoffs have left employees uncertain about Dyson’s future in Singapore. “We thought the company was going to step up investments here, but now we’re not so sure,” said one affected worker.

The Economic Development Board (EDB) issued a separate statement noting Dyson’s significant presence in Singapore. EDB emphasized that it would work closely with Dyson and relevant government agencies to support displaced workers, including helping them find new jobs in companies that require similar skill sets.

Social media outrage and scepticism    

In the aftermath of the layoffs, online platforms like Reddit and Facebook saw an outpouring of frustration.

Many commenters criticized Dyson for what they viewed as inconsistent behaviour, pointing out that the company frequently reposted job vacancies while simultaneously cutting jobs.

“This is a s**t company. They act like they’re hiring, but now they’re laying off,” one Reddit user wrote. Another added, “I’ve heard of this practice before. A lot of multinational corporations do the same thing.”

Others questioned the role of the union and the government in preventing such layoffs. “How does tripartism work here? Dyson is cutting jobs, and MOM is just watching,” one commenter posted, referring to the model of cooperation between the government, unions, and employers.

Another remarked, “Tripartite practice here is a joke. Trade unions should be independent to protect workers, but Singapore is too lax. Companies just take advantage.”

On Facebook, commenters continued to express dissatisfaction, with one individual asking why the union and MOM had not acted sooner.

“Is this because they are all white-collar workers? Only union members seem protected, while non-union workers have to fend for themselves.” Another wrote, “This retrenchment should have been handled better. Singapore is becoming too expensive, and when that happens, companies like Dyson will just leave.”

Many expressed scepticism about Dyson’s long-term commitment to Singapore. “They said they’d invest in Singapore, but now they’re cutting jobs. They take whatever benefits they can get and leave as soon as things get tough,” one commenter speculated.

Others pointed out the growing global competition for skilled workers, with one user writing, “More countries can do what Singapore does at a fraction of the cost. If we don’t innovate, we’ll lose more jobs.”

As the debate continues online, affected employees are left to navigate the uncertainty brought on by the layoffs, with many unsure about what the future holds for Dyson’s operations in Singapore.

Continue Reading
10 Comments
Subscribe
Notify of
10 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Labour

44-year-old Bangladeshi worker dies in worksite accident at Resorts World Sentosa

A Bangladeshi worker died after being struck by a collapsed steel structure at a worksite in Resorts World Sentosa. The accident occurred during lifting operations on 29 September. Authorities confirmed no foul play is suspected, and the contractor has been ordered to halt all lifting activities as investigations continue.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: A 44-year-old Bangladeshi worker tragically died following an accident at a construction site within Resorts World Sentosa (RWS) on Sunday (29 September).

According to Lianhe Zaobao, the worker, whose identity has not been disclosed, was fatally struck by a steel structure that collapsed during lifting operations at the site, which is part of the former Maritime Experiential Museum area.

Authorities were alerted to the accident at approximately 8 a.m. at 8 Sentosa Gateway. When police and Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) personnel arrived, the worker was found unconscious.

A paramedic from the SCDF pronounced the man dead at the scene, according to the Singapore Police Force.

The Ministry of Manpower (MOM) confirmed that part of the steel structure collapsed while it was being lifted, causing it to strike the worker.

MOM has instructed Sunray Woodcraft Construction, the contractor responsible for the site, to halt all lifting activities immediately.

The ministry stressed the importance of ensuring that lifting equipment and supporting structures are properly designed, installed, and inspected as a general safety measure.

RWS said the incident took place in a section of the resort where the public does not have access. The area had previously housed the Maritime Experiential Museum, which was shut down in March 2020 to make way for the expansion of the S.E.A. Aquarium.

This project, part of the broader Resorts World Sentosa expansion, began in 2022. When completed, the rebranded Singapore Oceanarium is expected to be three times the size of the original aquarium and will include a research and learning centre.

In a statement, RWS acknowledged that it was informed of the accident by the contractor on the morning of 29 September and confirmed its cooperation with the authorities as investigations continue.

The police have ruled out foul play but have noted that the investigation is still ongoing.

The Manpower Ministry’s statistics show that there were 36 fatal workplace accidents in 2023, down from 46 in 2022 and 37 in 2021.

Continue Reading

Community

Singaporean influencer faces online backlash for berating domestic worker over chore logs

A Singaporean influencer faced intense online backlash after a video emerged of her berating her domestic worker. She allegedly complained about the helper’s English proficiency and work pace, expressing dissatisfaction with her failure to consistently fill out a chore notebook that recorded tasks down to the minute. The Centre for Domestic Employees (CDE) has since escalated the case to the Ministry of Manpower for further investigation.

Published

on

A Singaporean influencer, identified only as “L,” has sparked controversy after filming herself berating her domestic worker for being “slow” and sending the footage to Regent Maid Agency.

The video, later shared by the agency on Facebook on 16 September, revealed L’s dissatisfaction with the worker’s performance, prompting public backlash.

In a statement, the agency explained that the woman had expressed her frustration with the helper’s language proficiency and work performance shortly after hiring her.

In the video, L is seen sitting in front of a table with the domestic worker standing beside her.

L initially insists that she is not scolding the worker, but confronts her for not responding to a question, claiming the helper had remained silent for “a minute and 46 seconds.”

“Are you gonna to answer?” L asked the helper twice in the video.

At around 50 seconds into the video, L loses her temper, slamming the table and shouting, “Halo! You think what? My time is very what? What do you think you are?”

Subsequent footage shows L flipping through a booklet detailing household chores, with specific times down to minutes logged next to each task, such as vacuuming and cleaning.

L Enforces Strict Chore Documentation System for Helper

The domestic worker, a 25-year-old from Myanmar, began working with L on 12 July.

According to Regent Maid Agency, L had requested a worker who spoke English well, despite opting for the salary range of a fresh worker.

The agency claims they had managed L’s expectations prior to confirming the worker.

However, L reported that the helper did not meet her expectations in terms of English proficiency and work pace.

The agency revealed that Ms. L implemented a system requiring the helper to document completed chores and the time taken for each task, which ultimately caused further dissatisfaction.

While the agency’s agent worked to manage Ms. L’s expectations regarding the helper’s abilities and salary, they provided continuous support to both parties, including counseling sessions aimed at addressing performance and communication issues.

However, the helper allegedly experienced significant stress due to the work environment, which included instances of verbal abuse. She sought assistance from the agency and even considered repatriation due to the challenging conditions.

The agency noted that Ms. L complained about the helper’s failure to consistently fill out the chore notebook as instructed and also raised concerns over communication difficulties.

According to Mothership, the worker was reportedly required to refold clothes repeatedly until they met L’s standards, with the training session extending until midnight.

Regent Maid Agency reminded Ms. L that workers are entitled to a minimum of eight hours of rest each day.

L Allegedly Threatens to Involve Government Ministers and Leverage Public Influence

 

According to the agency, L expressed her intent to escalate her concerns to several high-ranking government officials, including Dr Tan See Leng, Minister for Manpower, and Mr. K Shanmugam, Minister for Home Affairs.

Additionally, as an influencer, L threatened to publicly highlight her experience to discourage others from facing similar issues.

L also requested to replace the domestic worker. However, Regent Maid Agency explained that, per the service agreement, third-party fees are applicable for a replacement.

L reportedly claimed that her friends were not charged similar fees by other agencies, but Regent Maid Agency emphasized that L was made aware of the terms when signing the agreement.

“We do not recycle helpers who are unsuitable. Our goal is to find the best fit for both employers and helpers, avoiding unnecessary frustration,” the agency explained.

“While employers have the right to express their concerns, it is also important to recognize the challenges faced by agencies and helpers. We are committed to handling each case with professionalism and fairness.”

Agency and CDE Respond

Despite numerous attempts to address L’s feedback and concerns, including counselling sessions for the worker, the situation did not improve.

Regent Maid Agency disclosed that L allegedly continued to file complaints, including after operating hours, sometimes as late as midnight.

Since the video was posted, the Centre for Domestic Employees (CDE) has contacted the agency to assist with the issue.

The CDE has escalated the matter to the Ministry of Manpower for further investigation.

CDE encourages any migrant domestic worker in need of assistance to reach out via their 24-hour helpline at 1800-2255-233 or through their Facebook page.

Netizen Criticized the Influencer for Demanding “Butler’s Standards” from Her Helper

Netizens widely condemned the influencer’s behavior towards her domestic worker, with many expressing outrage over the disrespectful treatment and unreasonable expectations.

Some criticised whether the influencer for expecting “butler’s standards” from a helper, pointing out that tracking tasks down to the minute and shouting at the worker was excessive and unfair.

Several netizens were disturbed by the influencer’s tone, slamming the table and shouting at the worker, calling it a clear form of verbal abuse. Some urged the agency to support the worker and file a formal complaint.

Many netizens expressed empathy and heartbreak for the domestic worker, highlighting how the public humiliation and harsh treatment were unjustifiable.

They criticised the culture of entitlement some employers display toward their helpers.

A Netizen Recalls Stressful Experience of Documenting Every Chore While Working for a Family

A netizen shared her personal experience of working for an family, highlighting the stress caused not by the workload but by the need to meticulously document all chores.

She was were required to write down the start and finish times for each task, including cooking, and provide detailed explanations of how the food was prepared, step by step.

“Everytime I cook food I also write it the down and you need to explain what you put first in order until the food cooked.. imagine I make food 3 to 4 times a day and 3 types of food even roti prata or rice need to record in the piece of paper”

Continue Reading

Trending