Former Transport Minister Iswaran was sentenced to 12 months in prison on 3 October 2024 for accepting valuable gifts while in public office and obstructing the course of justice.

The court granted Iswaran’s request to surrender himself at 4 p.m. on 7 October 2024 to begin his sentence. However, his lead lawyer, Davinder Singh, indicated that the start of the sentence could be delayed depending on “instructions,” hinting at the possibility of an appeal.

However, despite the 12-month sentence, it is highly likely that Iswaran will serve less time in prison due to Singapore’s Conditional Remission System (CRS) and potentially the Home Detention Scheme (HDS).

Under the CRS, prisoners in Singapore may be released early if they demonstrate good behaviour.

Typically, under the CRS, inmates are eligible for release after serving two-thirds of their sentence. In Iswaran’s case, this means he could be released after serving eight months in prison, with the remaining four months of his sentence subject to a Conditional Remission Order (CRO).

The CRO, a legal mechanism that enforces strict conditions post-release, requires compliance with several terms, such as reporting to authorities and avoiding any criminal activity. If Iswaran violates these conditions, he could face penalties, including being sent back to prison to serve the remainder of his sentence.

Alongside CRS, there is also the possibility that Iswaran could serve part of his sentence under the Home Detention Scheme (HDS), which allows prisoners to serve their final months under strict supervision at home.

Take the case of former Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) Chief Peter Lim Sin Pang, for example.

Lim was sentenced to six months in prison in 2013 for corruption.

After serving three months in Changi Prison, he was supposedly placed on home detention for one month — if we consider how CRO grants him two months of remission — allowing him to complete his sentence under supervision.

Home detention meant that Lim would spend his remaining sentence at home under electronic monitoring, fitted with an electronic monitoring device, typically worn as an ankle bracelet, which allows authorities to track his location at all times.

Like other inmates under the HDS, his movements were tightly controlled, and he was allowed out only for specific activities, such as attending work, medical appointments, or rehabilitation programmes, during limited hours.

Any deviation from the permitted activities or failure to return home on time could lead to immediate consequences, including being returned to prison to complete the sentence.

Eligibility for home detention depends on various factors, such as the inmate’s behaviour during incarceration and the level of risk they pose to society.

This scheme aims to reintegrate prisoners into society while maintaining strict oversight.

If HDS is applicable, Iswaran might spend even less time behind bars, as he could transition to home detention before completing the full period under the CRS.

SINGAPORE: Red Dot United (RDU) has voiced serious concerns regarding the recent layoffs at Dyson and Samsung, which have left many workers in Singapore facing sudden retrenchments.

In an statement issued on Wednesday (2 October), RDU highlighted that in July 2023, Dyson’s founder, James Dyson, was awarded the Public Service Star for his significant contributions to the Singapore economy.

“Yet, less than a year later, Dyson’s Singapore staff were shown the door with what seems to be a cavalier attitude towards their well-being.”

RDU criticised the ineffectiveness of unions under the National Trades Union Congress (NTUC) in supporting workers facing retrenchment, echoing earlier controversies such as the Lazada layoffs, where unions appeared reactive rather than proactive in advocating for their members’ interests.

The party pointed out that during the Lazada incident, the union struggled to provide concrete support to workers, leaving many feeling neglected.

RDU: Union Response Lacks Impact, Leaving Vulnerable Workers Without Assurance

In an earlier statement, the United Workers of Electronics and Electrical Industries (UWEEI) expressed disappointment at receiving just one day’s notice from Dyson, deeming it insufficient for meaningful dialogue.

Although the union has escalated the matter to the Ministry of Manpower and expressed willingness to support affected workers, it also clarified that these retrenched staff fall outside the union’s scope of representation under the collective agreement with Dyson.

RDU said this leaves the union’s response looking inadequate and toothless, offering little assurance to workers in such vulnerable positions.

RDU also criticises the Government’s “trampoline” approach, which has been promoted by Mr Tharman Shanmugaratnam, the current President, and NTUC’s Chief Ng Chee Meng.

RDU said while the rhetoric sounds promising, affected workers feel they are landing on bare concrete without a safe bounce back.

“How has NTUC’s symbiotic relationship with the PAP helped the workers in this instance?”

RDU further questioned the adequacy of the Government’s SkillsFuture Jobseeker Support Scheme, arguing that $6,000 over six months is insufficient to ensure genuine job security and support for those affected.

“A temporary financial cushion is no substitute for real job security. Whatever help scheme the Government rolls out should not place additional pressure on vulnerable workers, many of whom need more comprehensive support to regain their footing.”

RDU highlighted that workers in Singapore are facing a “double blow” due to ineffective unions and a government safety net that is insufficient to support those in need.

” This is because the unions, which should be standing strong for workers’ rights, are often perceived as being too closely aligned with the ruling party’s goals rather than focused on the needs of the workers.”

“It is no surprise, then, that many of those affected feel alone and uncertain about their future.”

RDU reiterated its long-standing call for stronger measures to ensure fair treatment of workers during retrenchments.

The party stressed that layoffs have significant personal impacts, affecting individuals, families, and overall societal well-being, rather than being seen solely as economic occurrences.

RDU proposed specific solutions to enhance support for laid-off workers, such as improving unemployment insurance and allowing Central Provident Fund (CPF) members, particularly older workers, to borrow from their accounts during unemployment. This would provide meaningful financial relief and help ease the stress of job transitions.

RDU underscored the urgency for both the Government and unions to demonstrate their commitment to protecting the livelihoods of Singaporeans amidst ongoing layoffs.