Connect with us

Parliament

Jamus Lim calls for equal recognition and rewards for Olympians and Paralympians

Assoc Prof Jamus Lim, Workers’ Party MP for Sengkang GRC, praised Olympians Jeralyn Tan, Maximilian Maeder, and Yip Pin Xiu in Parliament on 16 October 2024 for their Paris Games achievements. He called for equal monetary rewards for Olympians and Paralympians, citing moral and economic grounds for fairness.

Published

on

Jeralyn Tan, Yip Pin Xiu and Maximilian Maeder

In a speech delivered on 16 October 2024 in Parliament, Associate Professor Jamus Lim, Workers’ Party Member of Parliament for Sengkang GRC, expressed his admiration for Team Singapore athletes at the 2024 Paris Olympic and Paralympic Games.

During the motion titled Olympic and Paralympic Achievements, Lim particularly acknowledged medallists Jeralyn Tan, Maximilian Maeder, and Yip Pin Xiu for their outstanding performances and achievements.

Assoc Prof Lim began by extending his appreciation to all national athletes, stating that their dedication and sacrifices, whether they secured a medal or not, exemplified their passion and commitment to the nation.

He noted the extraordinary efforts of Jeralyn Tan, who secured a medal in boccia at the Paralympics, Maximilian Maeder, who became Singapore’s youngest Olympic medallist in kitefoiling, and Yip Pin Xiu, who continued her dominance in the pool by winning two gold medals in backstroke events.

Despite these commendations, Assoc Prof Lim raised questions about the disparity in the monetary rewards offered to Olympians and Paralympians in Singapore.

He noted that, under the current system, cash rewards are given under separate programmes: the Major Games Award (MGA) for Olympians, managed by the Singapore National Olympic Council (SNOC), and the Athletes’ Achievement Awards (AAA) for Paralympians, overseen by the Singapore National Paralympic Council (SNPC).

Assoc Prof Lim highlighted that these rewards are funded by the Tote Board, a government agency, leading him to question why the government has not taken steps to ensure parity between the two.

He recalled previous Parliamentary questions posed by both the Workers’ Party and the People’s Action Party, alluding to bipartisan concerns over the unequal treatment of able-bodied athletes and athletes with disabilities.

Assoc Prof Lim argued that, while the SNOC and SNPC are technically non-governmental organisations (NGOs), their close ties to the government through sponsorship and council membership—some of which involve current and former ministers—suggest that the government can exercise influence over the award structures.

Addressing the economic arguments for unequal rewards, Assoc Prof Lim pointed out that athletes generally compete for the love of their sport rather than financial gain, yet still require financial support to continue competing at the highest levels.

He argued that monetary rewards, though secondary to passion, play a crucial role in allowing athletes to sustain their careers, especially during periods where success may be uncertain.

Assoc Prof Lim also refuted arguments that Paralympians should receive smaller rewards because their competitions are less popular or have fewer participants.

He equated this reasoning to arguing that athletes in less popular sports like sepak takraw or silat should receive smaller rewards compared to footballers. In his view, such distinctions undermine the value of diverse sporting disciplines and achievements.

Expanding on this argument, Assoc Prof Lim cited the example of the U.S. women’s soccer team, which, despite drawing larger audiences and generating more revenue than their male counterparts, fought a lengthy legal battle for equal pay.

Similarly, he pointed to the case of athletes in the billion-dollar NCAA leagues in the U.S., who receive limited compensation despite the vast revenues their performances generate.

He concluded his economic analysis by stating that the market dynamics of supply and demand do not justify the current disparity in rewards for Olympians and Paralympians.

Rather, the issue should be viewed through a moral lens. According to Assoc Prof Lim, Paralympians deserve equal recognition for competing at the highest levels, regardless of their classification or the number of competitors in their categories.

In his closing remarks, Assoc Prof Lim urged the government to take an active role in ensuring equal monetary rewards for both groups of athletes, following the lead of countries like Canada, the United States, and France, which have already implemented similar policies.

He argued that such a move would align with Singapore’s broader values of equality, compassion, and non-discrimination.

Assoc Prof Lim’s call to action was framed within the context of broader societal goals, with the Workers’ Party having long advocated for equal opportunities for all Singaporeans.

He concluded by stating that recognising the achievements of all athletes equally, through financial rewards, would be a significant step towards fostering a more inclusive and equitable society.

Continue Reading
1 Comment
Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Parliament

K Shanmugam: Estimated 853 stateless persons live in Singapore, including 20 under age 18

In a Parliamentary reply, Minister Shanmugam stated that, as of 31 December 2023, approximately 853 stateless individuals live in Singapore. Among them, 7 are under the age of 12, and 13 are between 12 and 18. He highlighted the stringent Singapore citizenship policies while noting that access to healthcare and education for stateless students depends on meeting specific admission criteria.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: As of 31 December 2023, an estimated 853 stateless persons reside in Singapore, as shared by Mr K Shanmugam, Minister for Home Affairs and Minister for Law.

In a written parliamentary reply on 15 October, he noted that there are seven stateless persons under the age of 12 and thirteen between the ages of 12 and 18, which constitutes 2.3% of the total number of stateless individuals in Singapore.

He explained that their circumstances vary, with one reason being that some were born in Singapore to foreign parents who did not secure citizenship for their child in their home country.

Minister Shanmugam emphasised that it is the responsibility of parents or legal guardians to ensure the child’s well-being, including obtaining citizenship for their child.

However, he assured that if a child or young person lacks a willing or capable parent or caregiver for guardianship in Singapore, they may receive statutory protection under the Children and Young Persons Act.

Minister Shanmugam disclosed the number of stateless persons in response to questions from Members of Parliament concerning stateless children and young people living in Singapore.

Nominated Member of Parliament Assoc Prof Razwana Begum Abdul Rahim submitted three PQs regarding the number of stateless children and young people in Singapore, legal parental responsibilities, the country’s compliance with the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, and the support services available for their accommodation, healthcare, and education.

Singapore’s Reservation to Article 7 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child

In response, Minister Shanmugam reiterated that Singapore does not automatically grant citizenship to a child simply because they are born here.

He highlighted that the Singapore Constitution automatically confers Singapore citizenship (SC) on children born in Singapore to married parents, provided that at least one parent is an SC.

“If the child is born to foreign parents, we do not automatically confer citizenship, and would assess any citizenship application alongside all other applications.”

He explained that applications for SC are evaluated based on various criteria, including the applicant’s conduct and contributions, their links to Singapore (such as family members who are Singaporeans), and the duration of their stay in Singapore. The circumstances surrounding a person’s statelessness are also considered.

Due to Singapore’s citizenship policy, the city-state has made a reservation to Article 7 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, as explained by Minister Shanmugam.

Article 7 stipulates that every child has the right to be registered immediately after birth and to have a name and nationality, in accordance with national laws and obligations under relevant international instruments.

Access to Healthcare, Education, and Housing for Stateless Persons

Nevertheless, Minister Shanmugam stated that regarding access to healthcare, education, and housing, stateless persons who are Permanent Residents (PRs) are treated the same as other PRs.

Stateless individuals who are not PRs can utilize the MediSave accounts of their SC or PR family members. Stateless children and young people under state care can access healthcare subsidies through the Medical Fee Exemption Card and may also consult the healthcare institution’s medical social workers.

For education, stateless students may enroll in mainstream schools and tertiary institutions, provided they meet the admission criteria. They can seek school-based assistance and also consult social service agencies for advice on available financial aid.

In terms of housing, stateless individuals who are not PRs cannot buy or rent a flat from the Housing and Development Board (HDB).

However, they can reside in an HDB flat as an occupier if they are part of an eligible SC or PR family.

For those facing genuine housing difficulties and lacking alternative options, Minister Shanmugam said HDB will collaborate with relevant agencies, such as the Ministry of Social and Family Development, to assess how best to assist them.

Minister Shanmugam Emphasizes the Need for Discerning Citizenship Policies

Separately, Mr Shareal Taha, MP for Pasir Ris–Punggol GRC, in a PQ filed on 14 October, inquired about the current number of stateless residents who have lived in Singapore for more than 20 years and whether MHA would consider granting citizenship to stateless seniors who have resided in Singapore for over two decades.

Minister Shanmugam explained that while the overall figures for stateless persons in Singapore may vary, data on their length of residency is unavailable due to the different circumstances under which individuals may have become stateless.

For instance, some individuals may have chosen to give up or lost their foreign citizenship during their time in Singapore, while others were born to foreign parents who did not secure citizenship for them.

Their stateless status may only be identified when they approach or are referred to the Immigration and Checkpoints Authority (ICA), he added.

“Given that there are such cases, we won’t have precise data on how many stateless persons there are; and the precise period for which they have been stateless,” Minister Shanmugam explained.

He reiterated that applications for Singapore citizenship are evaluated based on a range of criteria, including whether the applicants have family ties in Singapore.

Minister Shanmugam cautioned that as one of the world’s smallest and most densely populated countries, Singapore must be highly discerning in granting citizenship.

“Hence, we carefully consider all applications for citizenship, on a case by case basis.”

The Stories of Stateless Youth and Seniors in Singapore

Last month, The Straits Times highlighted the story of a 25-year-old stateless person living in Clementi who has never attended school and struggles with basic literacy, despite being born in Singapore.

Raised by a Singaporean couple, he only learned of his statelessness in 2019 when police officers checked on him, leading to assistance from the Foundation of Rotary Clubs Singapore Family Service Centre, which helped him secure a Special Pass to work.

Despite being authorised to work, he faces significant challenges in finding employment due to his status and often feels isolated and inadequate compared to his peers who have received an education.

In addition, social media and news outlets have highlighted the stories of stateless seniors.

For instance, a 70-year-old man, who has lived in Singapore for over seven decades, makes ends meet by selling tissues near the Paya Lebar MRT station.

He became stateless after losing his Malaysian citizenship at the age of 25 and faces difficulties in obtaining Singaporean citizenship due to language barriers.

According to 8World News, the man, who has no children and lacks a stable income, resides alone in the living room of a Housing Development Board (HDB) apartment in Aljunied, where he pays a monthly rent of S$350.

In 2022, with assistance from the authorities, he acquired a special pass and now receives S$410 monthly, which has alleviated some of his financial challenges.

Continue Reading

Parliament

Leong Mun Wai urges review of Land Transport Master Plan after major EWL disruption

NCMP Leong Mun Wai, in an adjournment motion, called for a comprehensive review of the Land Transport Master Plan and Bus Connectivity Enhancement Plan following the major six-day disruption on the East-West Line. He urged the Government to address public transport issues in the West while ensuring equitable improvements for residents across the entire island.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Mr Leong Mun Wai, Non-Constituency Member of Parliament (NCMP) from Progress Singapore Party (PSP), on Tuesday (15 October) filed an adjournment motion titled “Realising the Vision of a 45-Minute City in the West of Singapore under the Land Transport Master Plan 2040.”

The motion comes in the wake of a major disruption on the East-West MRT Line (EWL) between Buona Vista and Jurong East stations from 25 to 30 September, which highlighted the heavy reliance of West-side residents on this critical transport line.

Mr Leong and PSP the are calling for a comprehensive review of the Land Transport Master Plan and Bus Connectivity Enhancement Plan, urging the Government to address public transport issues in the West while ensuring equitable improvements across the entire island.

In his speech, NCMP Leong highlighted the disparity in rail connectivity between the east and west of Singapore, stating that the east is served by three parallel rail lines—namely the East-West Line, Downtown Line, and Thomson-East Coast Line—providing greater options for residents.

In contrast, during the six-day disruption, West-side residents commuting to and from downtown had no alternative MRT options, forcing them to rely on bus bridging services or endure lengthy bus rides.

“Many residents have complained to me that it took them more than three hours to commute during the initial days of the breakdown, ” Mr Leong shared.

Leong acknowledged the upcoming Jurong Region Line (JRL) and Cross Island Line (CRL) as improvements but highlighted that the East-West Line would still remain a major bottleneck for commuters traveling between the East and West of Singapore.

He pointed out that areas in the West, such as Jurong West, Tengah, and upcoming employment hubs like Jurong Lake District, house a dense population and growing job centers, requiring better connectivity to other parts of Singapore.

He suggested extending the JRL from Pandan Reservoir to Haw Par Villa on the Circle Line, which would allow residents in areas like Bukit Panjang, West Coast, and NUS to reach the downtown core with fewer transfers.

This proposal had been mentioned by previous ministers but has not been incorporated into LTMP 2040.

Another suggestion was to create an interchange between Jurong Town Hall station (JRL) and Jurong Lake District station (CRL), which are currently within walking distance but lack direct rail connectivity. This would improve convenience and resilience for commuters.

Leong recommended introducing a network of Skip-Stop Bus Services that would complement the MRT system by stopping only at high-demand points in each town, enabling faster travel between towns. These services would operate throughout the day, unlike current express buses that run mainly during peak hours.

SMS Amy Khor Highlights Ongoing Initiatives to Enhance Connectivity for West-side Residents

In her speech responding to NCMP Leong Mun Wai’s proposals on improving transport connectivity in the West, Senior Minister of State for Transport Amy Khor reaffirmed the government’s commitment to creating a “45-minute City and 20-minute towns” as outlined in the Land Transport Master Plan 2040.

She explained that this vision is not only about reducing travel times but also reshaping urban connectivity by linking employment centers with residential areas.

Khor acknowledged Leong’s concerns about the West’s transport connectivity and highlighted the government’s ongoing efforts to address these issues.

She pointed out that Leong’s suggestions align with existing plans to improve transport in the West, particularly through the development of the JRL and the CRL.

These new rail lines are expected to reduce travel times and enhance resilience by providing additional connections to key areas like Jurong Lake District and various employment centers.

Khor also emphasized that while the East has more rail lines, it is not a fair comparison due to differences in geography and development stages. She noted that by the 2030s, 80% of households in the West will be within a 10-minute walk of an MRT station.

On bus services, she mentioned that more than one-third of bus routes serve the West, including express services that connect residents to job centers.

In response to growing demand from new housing developments, she highlighted recent enhancements in areas like Tengah and Bukit Batok, including the introduction of three new bus services.

SMS Khor reassured that ongoing efforts to improve both rail and bus connectivity, as well as the creation of regional job centers like Jurong Lake District and Jurong Innovation District, will bring employment opportunities closer to home for residents in the West.

She called for patience as these infrastructure improvements take time to materialize.

 

Continue Reading

Trending