Connect with us

Singapore

Rahayu Mahzam intends to take legal action over alleged defamatory online post by academic

Minister of State Rahayu Mahzam intends to take legal action over a Facebook post made by academic Donald Low, who wrote, “One has now admitted to tampering with evidence — apparently with the knowledge of a PAP MP.”

Published

on

Minister of State for Digital Development and Information, and Health, Rahayu Mahzam, stated on 18 October, 2024, that she intends to take legal action following an online post that she believes to be defamatory.

The post, written by academic Donald Low, involved allegations about her role in the Committee of Privileges (COP), which investigated former Sengkang GRC MP Raeesah Khan for lying in Parliament.

Hours before Rahayu’s statement, Donald Low, a senior lecturer at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology’s Institute for Public Policy, made a Facebook post commenting on evidence brought before the State Courts in the ongoing trial of Workers’ Party (WP) chief Pritam Singh.

In his post, Low questioned the credibility of the COP’s findings, particularly in light of recent revelations in court regarding one of the witnesses.

The court heard that Loh Pei Ying, a former WP cadre and key witness in the COP’s investigation, had admitted to redacting parts of a text message in documents submitted to the COP in 2021.

These redactions, according to Low, cast doubt on the COP’s conclusions against Singh. He argued that the case had been built on the testimonies of two witnesses, including Loh, who have since been shown to be unreliable.

Low stated in his post, “It looks like the COP got it wrong,” and added that one of the witnesses admitted to tampering with evidence “apparently with the knowledge of a PAP MP.”

He named Rahayu Mahzam, a People’s Action Party (PAP) Member of Parliament for Jurong GRC, noting that she was a member of the COP.

In her response, Rahayu rejected Low’s assertions, describing them as a serious and unfounded allegation.

“The allegation is wholly untrue and appears to be defamatory. I am seeking legal advice and intend to take action,” she wrote on Facebook, emphasising her commitment to challenging the claims legally.

The controversy centres around evidence presented on 17 October, when Loh admitted to redacting a message from another WP member, Yudhishthra Nathan, before submitting it to the COP.

The message, dated 12 October 2021, discussed Raeesah Khan’s earlier lie to Parliament about a sexual assault case. Nathan suggested that Khan continue with her falsehood, having already misled Parliament in August and October of that year.

Loh redacted a portion of Nathan’s message that read, “In the first place, I think we should just not give too many details. At most apologise for not having the facts about her age accurate.”

She explained in court that the redaction was done because the content “does not look good on him.”

Loh also mentioned that both a senior parliamentary staff member and Rahayu Mahzam reviewed the messages before the redaction.

“They read every single message before I redacted it,” she testified. However, she later clarified that the redaction was her own decision, stating, “This redaction is mine,” though she acknowledged that Rahayu would have seen the message.

This revelation has become central to Pritam Singh’s trial. Singh, as Leader of the Opposition, faces two charges of allegedly lying to the COP during the investigation.

He is accused of misleading the committee about whether or not he advised Raeesah Khan to come clean about the fabricated story she told in Parliament concerning a sexual assault victim. Khan had claimed she accompanied the victim to a police station and witnessed police mishandling the case, but later admitted the story was untrue.

The ongoing trial of Pritam Singh continues to receive significant attention, with the credibility of witnesses and the integrity of evidence becoming focal points in the proceedings.

Continue Reading
8 Comments
Subscribe
Notify of
8 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Community

Love Aid Singapore cease partnership with International Relief Organisation due to legal issues in Germany

Singaporean activist Gilbert Goh, founder of Love Aid Singapore, announced the immediate cessation of collaboration with the International Relief Organisation due to its legal troubles in Germany. Goh emphasized the commitment to humanitarian aid for Palestinians while avoiding political entanglements.

Published

on

By

SINGAPORE: Singaporean activist Gilbert Goh, founder of Love Aid Singapore, has announced the immediate cessation of collaboration with the NGO International Relief Organisation (IRO).

This decision follows IRO’s involvement in a court case with German authorities concerning allegations of incitement. Goh announced this update via Love Aid Singapore’s Instagram on Friday (18 Oct).

In consultation with the Commissioner of Charities (COC), Goh stated, “We have decided to cease collaboration with our partner NGO in Gaza, International Relief Organisation, with immediate effect.”

The Palestinian NGO, registered in Germany, is facing legal challenges due to politically charged postings made by its head, which have drawn scrutiny from German authorities.

Germany’s position regarding the conflict has been notable, as it has consistently supported Israel’s military actions.

Reports from Anadolu Agency on Monday (14 Oct) indicated that Germany reiterated its support for Israel’s military offensive in Gaza, despite rising civilian casualties.

German Foreign Ministry spokesman Sebastian Fischer stated, “We see no signs that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza,” during a press briefing in Berlin.

His comments followed airstrikes by Israeli warplanes on tents housing displaced Palestinians near Al-Aqsa Hospital in central Gaza, resulting in multiple civilian deaths and injuries.

Fischer also dismissed media claims suggesting that German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock had blocked weapons exports to Israel, emphasizing that Germany’s stance had not changed.

He noted, “We have spoken here often, we have presented this before the International Court of Justice, the minister has spoken out, and our position has not changed.”

Last year, Germany approved arms exports to Israel worth 326.5 million euros (US$363.5 million), although approvals dropped significantly this year, totaling only 14.5 million euros (US$15.7 million) from January to 21 August.

Amid these developments, Goh emphasized that Love Aid Singapore, as a humanitarian outreach group, strives to remain neutral in political matters despite its pro-Palestinian stance.

“We are here to help the Palestinians with our humanitarian work and, if possible, avoid any political trappings as a result of our stand,” he explained.

In light of the dire humanitarian situation in Gaza, Love Aid Singapore has submitted an application to the COC for a new NGO—a humanitarian entity with established contacts in Gaza.

Goh has requested an expedited review of this application, expressing hope that the new collaboration can commence swiftly.

“We hope to begin work by next week in Gaza with the new charity group,” he stated.

The organization plans to gradually transfer all initiatives from IRO to the new group to ensure that Gaza Aid charity work continues without interruption.

“Nothing will be shortchanged; everything will resume as much as possible, if not all,” Goh reassured supporters.

Despite the challenges presented by this setback, Goh remains committed to providing aid to the suffering Palestinians in Gaza.

Since Israel launched its war against Hamas in Gaza last October, over 42,200 Palestinians have been killed, and more than 99,000 have been injured, predominantly women and children.

According to the United Nations, Israel has also prohibited the entry of food and essential supplies into Northern Gaza since October, putting 1 million people at risk of starvation.

Continue Reading

Singapore

Singaporean teen arrested under ISA for alleged terror plot weeks before planned attack

A 17-year-old Singaporean has been arrested under the Internal Security Act for allegedly planning a terror attack using a knife or scissors. The Internal Security Department claims the teen, self-radicalised through online extremist material, planned to target non-Muslim males near Tampines West Community Centre.

Published

on

A 17-year-old Singaporean student was arrested in August under the Internal Security Act (ISA) for allegedly planning a terror attack in a Housing Board area, according to a press release by the Internal Security Department (ISD) on Friday (18 Oct).

The youth, described by ISD as a supporter of the Islamic State (IS), allegedly intended to attack non-Muslim males near Tampines West Community Centre using a knife or scissors during the September school holidays.

The ISD claims the teenager had self-radicalised online and planned to execute the attack as an act of jihad.

According to ISD, such attacks, involving everyday items like knives, require minimal preparation and are difficult to anticipate. This case marks the fifth reported instance since 2020 of self-radicalised youth planning attacks in Singapore, as stated by the department.

Alleged preparations for attack

The ISD claims that the youth had identified a high-footfall area near his home for the attack and had conducted what ISD describes as a “walkthrough” in June to familiarise himself with the route.

ISD alleges that he had been practising stabbing techniques with scissors to inflict maximum damage by targeting his victims’ necks. They state that he was less than a month away from carrying out his plan when he was arrested.

Additionally, ISD reports that the youth drafted a declaration of jihad, which he planned to release before his alleged attack, supposedly hoping to inspire others to engage in similar violent acts. The youth has been issued a two-year detention order under the ISA.

Claims of self-radicalisation

The ISD report suggests that the youth became exposed to radical online material in August 2023 while searching for religious teachings.

ISD alleges that he encountered content from foreign preachers and, over time, began to adopt segregationist views, including beliefs that Muslims should not interact with non-Muslims. These claims, however, are based on the ISD’s own investigation, and no independent verification has been provided.

According to ISD, the conflict between Hamas and Israel on 7 October 2023 led to a surge in online extremist material, particularly from IS and other terrorist groups.

The youth reportedly consumed such content and began to believe in the IS narrative of armed violence to establish an Islamic caliphate. ISD claims that, by January 2024, the youth was aspiring to become a martyr for IS and had joined online groups associated with the organisation. However, no independent sources have confirmed these details.

Intent to join IS in Syria

Before planning the alleged local attack, ISD states that the youth had considered travelling to Syria to join IS forces.

The department claims that he had reached out to an online contact based in Syria and had researched flight routes, though no specific timeline for travel was provided.

According to ISD, the youth ultimately decided to plan a local attack in Singapore, believing it would be easier to carry out without arousing suspicion.

ISD further alleges that the youth saw National Service (NS) as a means to gain combat skills, even though he reportedly viewed the Singaporean government as secular and incompatible with his beliefs. The claims about his motivations and plans are solely based on ISD’s account.

Broader context and security concerns

The ISD has pointed to this case as part of a broader trend in which youths are becoming radicalised through online materials. Since 2020, five self-radicalised youths have been arrested under the ISA, according to the department.

ISD suggests that the accessibility of online extremist content continues to pose a significant security threat, and this latest case adds to ongoing concerns about homegrown radicalisation in Singapore.

The ISA, which allows for detention without trial, has long been a tool used by Singaporean authorities to deal with suspected threats to national security.

However, the lack of transparency around the detainees’ cases and the difficulty in independently verifying the claims made by ISD have raised questions among some observers.

Authorities, including the ISD, emphasise the importance of monitoring online spaces to prevent further cases of radicalisation.

However, without independent verification of the facts presented by ISD due to the lack of trial, it remains challenging to fully assess the specifics of this case.

Speaking to the media on Friday (18 October), Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam stated that the youth had been inspired by ISIS propaganda and was aware that he would be intercepted by authorities.

“He had made up his mind to die during the attack because he wanted to become a martyr,” Mr Shanmugam said.

Continue Reading

Trending