Connect with us

Politics

Edwin Tong: Demolishing 38 Oxley Road now would “straightaway rule out options”

Despite Lee Hsien Yang’s request to demolish 38 Oxley Road following his sister Dr Lee Wei Ling’s passing, Minister for Culture, Community and Youth Edwin Tong opposed immediate demolition, stating it would “straightaway rule out options which can be considered.” The National Heritage Board (NHB) will study the site to determine its potential as a national monument.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Minister for Culture, Community and Youth Edwin Tong has stated that allowing Mr Lee Hsien Yang to proceed with immediate demolition works at 38 Oxley Road would “straightaway rule out options which can be considered.”

In a Facebook post on 24 October, Mr Tong emphasised that “we do not think that any option should be precluded, or closed off, at this stage.”

Mr Lee, the younger son of founding prime minister Lee Kuan Yew, is the current owner of 38 Oxley Road and applied to the authorities on 21 October for permission to demolish the house.

To carry out the demolition, he requires approval for building works from the Building and Construction Authority, as well as planning permission from the Urban Redevelopment Authority.

Acknowledging the recent discussions surrounding the house following the passing of Dr Lee Wei Ling, Mr Tong noted, “There is, quite understandably, a range of different views amongst Singaporeans on the matter.”

Dr Lee, Mr Lee Kuan Yew’s daughter, passed away on 9 October at the age of 69, leaving the house uninhabited.

Mr Lee Kuan Yew began renting the one-storey bungalow in the mid-1940s, purchased it in 1965, and lived there until his death in 2015.

Mr Tong encouraged Singaporeans to approach the matter with an open mind and to keep options open, stating, “The passage of time will help us better appreciate the matter in its proper context, with the benefit of some hindsight.”

National Heritage Board to study 38 Oxley Road preservation despite Lee Hsien Yang’s demolition request

On the same day, the National Heritage Board (NHB) announced it would conduct a study of the site to determine whether it “has national historical, heritage, and architectural significance as to be worthy of preservation” as a national monument.

Mr Tong added, “If a Preservation Order is made, all options will remain open, and this will give the Government time to consider the different options identified in the ministerial committee report, or any other option.”

A preservation order designates a building or site as a national monument, restricting any alterations that can be made to it.

Mr Tong, who also serves as Second Minister for Law, stated that the study will be conducted by NHB’s Preservation of Sites and Monuments Advisory Board, which comprises experts from various sectors.

“They will carefully assess the merits, if any, of such preservation, and make their professional recommendations,” he explained.

Mr Lee Hsien Yang emphasises commitment to honour father’s wishes for demolition post Dr Lee Wei Ling’s departure

In a statement on 15 October, Mr Lee Hsien Yang reiterated his father’s long-standing wish for the house to be demolished after Dr Lee Wei Ling vacated it.

“To honour my parents’ last wishes, I am applying to demolish the house at 38 Oxley Road and thereafter to build a small private dwelling, to be held within the family in perpetuity,” he stated, stressing his duty as the sole living executor of his father’s estate to fulfil Lee Kuan Yew’s wishes “to the fullest extent of the law.”

Having recently been granted asylum in the UK, Lee Hsien Yang also recalled that in 2015, his elder brother, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, mentioned in Parliament that once Dr Lee Wei Ling no longer lived in the house, “it would be up to the government of the day” to decide on the matter of demolition.

“It has been nine years. That day is today,” said Lee Hsien Yang, asserting that the time has come for the government to make a decision.

Politics

Chee Soon Juan highlights impact of rising costs after closure of Orange & Teal’s 2nd outlet

In a video message, SDP chief Dr Chee Soon Juan highlighted how rising costs and GST increase to 9% have widely affected businesses in Singapore, resulted in reduced consumer spending, lower sales, and retrenchments. His comments followed the announcement that Orange & Teal, the café he co-owns with his wife, closed its second outlet in Marina Square on 11 October.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Dr Chee Soon Juan, Secretary-General of the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP), highlighted the rising costs and the impact of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) increase to 9% has widely affected businesses and reduced consumer spending, leading to lower sales and retrenchments.

This came after Orange & Teal, a café owned by Dr Chee and his wife, Dr Huang Chih Mei, announced on 11 October that they had closed down their second outlet in Marina Square, which opened in 2022.

The café, shared on social media that the closure was due to “rising costs,” while their Rochester Mall outlet would continue to operate as usual.

Dr Chee criticises Singapore’s “rentier economy” for contributing to economic downturn

In a video message on 22 October, Dr Chee Soon Juan addressed the closure of the café’s second outlet, noting that over the past couple of years, suppliers of coffee, cake, vegetables, and meat have been issuing notices about necessary “price adjustments.”

While he stated that he did not blame these businesses for their actions, he pointed out that they, too, face significant expenses and cost burdens.

He emphasised that these adjustments have been particularly noticeable since the increase of GST to 9%.

Dr Chee highlighted how this increase, combined with higher costs for supplies, rent, utilities, transportation, and fuel, has significantly contributed to inflation.

This inflationary pressure has created a double burden: rising costs for businesses and reduced consumer spending, resulting in lower sales and retrenchments.

He noted that these rising costs are forcing multinational companies such as Dyson and Samsung to either lay off workers or leave Singapore entirely, with UOB relocating to Kuala Lumpur.

Dr Chee also cited a report from Business Times, which revealed a significant increase in closures within the food and beverage (F&B) sector in 2024, surpassing even the pandemic year of 2020.

He criticised this downturn as a consequence of Singapore’s “rentier economy,” where the government relies on increasing fees and prices to extract wealth from the population, rather than fostering a productive and innovative economy.

To support his argument, Dr Chee referenced a recent study by Singaporean economists Professors Linda Lim and Pang Ng Fong, who described the current economic system as “inefficient, inequitable, and unsustainable.”

According to the study published on 15 October, this system’s weak productivity performance threatens Singapore’s competitiveness, economic growth, and living standards.

Dr Chee plans to corporatise Orange & Teal to fulfil his commitment as a full-time MP if elected

Dr Chee Soon Juan also reflected on his journey with Orange & Teal, expressing satisfaction with the success of the Rochester Mall outlet despite the challenges facing the F&B sector.

He mentioned that he had bigger plans for the café, which he would reveal in due course.

Dr Chee shared that the idea of starting the eatery was linked to his work with SDP over a decade ago, aiming to create a space that offered more than just dining.

He envisioned the café as a venue for passionate discussions, heated debates, and a place where minds and hearts could freely exchange ideas about life in Singapore.

Dr Chee described Orange & Teal as a microcosm of the Singapore he wished to see—vibrant, sophisticated, cultured, and built on open conversation.

He emphasised their efforts to keep prices low despite rising costs and called for continued support from customers to sustain the business.

Additionally, Dr Chee discussed his future plans to eventually corporatise the business and step back from daily operations as he prepared to honour his commitment to becoming a full-time Member of Parliament for Bukit Batok after the next general election, hinting at his intention to continue contesting in the constituency.

Continue Reading

Politics

Lee Hsien Yang accuses Lee Hsien Loong of being involved in persecution in exclusive Guardian interview

Lee Hsien Yang, the brother of Singapore’s former Prime Minister, has been granted asylum in the UK, citing political persecution. He claims the government, under his brother’s leadership, used legal actions to repress him. The Singaporean government denies these accusations.

Published

on

Lee Hsien Yang (LHY), the younger brother of Singapore’s former Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong (LHL), has been granted asylum in the UK after leaving Singapore.

He claims his departure was driven by what he describes as a campaign of political persecution by the Singaporean government under his brother’s administration.

In an exclusive interview with The Guardian, LHY accused the authorities of using legal actions and investigations to intimidate and repress him and his family.

LHY, son of Singapore’s late founding father Lee Kuan Yew (LKY), has become a controversial figure in Singaporean politics, particularly after a 2017 family dispute regarding the fate of LKY’s home.

This dispute centred around the fate of LKY’s home and became symbolic of deeper family tensions and allegations of abuse of power by LHL who is now Senior Minister.

In recent years, LHY has openly supported opposition parties in Singapore, breaking ranks with his family’s long-standing association with the ruling People’s Action Party (PAP).

In the interview, LHY described Singapore as a repressive state that presents an outward image of prosperity and efficiency but maintains authoritarian controls over dissent.

“Despite the very advanced economic prosperity that Singapore has, there’s a dark side to it, that the government is repressive,” he said.

“What people think, that this is some kind of paradise – it isn’t.”

He cited a series of legal actions taken against him, his wife Lee Suet Fern (LSF), and their son as evidence of this repression.

LHY’s asylum application was accepted in August 2024, two years after he left Singapore.

He believes the asylum grant is a recognition of the dangers he faces if he were to return. “I think it is an acknowledgment that Singapore has been persecuting me,” said LHY.

“For my own personal safety, I should not continue to live in Singapore,” he stated.

He also expressed frustration with Singapore’s facade of rule of law and transparency, accusing the government of facilitating illicit financial activities such as arms trading and money laundering.

The Singaporean government, however, has denied these accusations.

A government spokesperson refuted Lee’s claims, stating that Singapore has a robust legal system designed to combat corruption and illicit financial flows.

The spokesperson pointed to Singapore’s strong performance in Transparency International’s Corruption Perceptions Index, where the country ranks well above the UK.

“No one is above the law in Singapore, including the offspring of the founding prime minister,” the spokesperson added.

The family dispute that precipitated these events began after the death of LKY in 2015, when his children disagreed over the future of his house.

LKY had wished for his home to be demolished after his daughter, Lee Wei Ling (LWL), no longer lived there.

LHY and his sister supported this wish, but Lee Hsien Loong, then the Prime Minister, argued that their father had been open to government decisions regarding the house. This disagreement led to a series of legal and personal conflicts that have strained the family relationship, culminating in LHY’s decision to leave Singapore.

In 2017, LHY’s son, Li Shengwu, was fined for contempt of court over a Facebook post in which he criticised Singapore’s judiciary.

The government also launched disciplinary action against LSF, a prominent lawyer, accusing her of professional misconduct in relation to Lee Kuan Yew’s will. She was suspended from practising law for 15 months.

LHY and his wife are also under investigation for alleged perjury linked to the case, although the couple maintains that the charges are baseless.

LHY has been vocal in his criticism of his brother’s leadership.

In the interview with The Guardian, LHY implied that the legal actions against him and his family could not have occurred without the involvement of his brother, Lee Hsien Loong.

“In a tightly controlled country like Singapore, these kinds of actions could not have happened without the agreement and acquiescence of Lee Hsien Loong,” he said.

LHL has not commented publicly on this specific allegation.

He told the Guardian he believed the current allegations against him and his wife were politically motivated attempts to destroy him.

He also said he had been among the targets of Singapore’s “very extensive surveillance system”.

Despite the legal battles and personal strife, LHY remains hopeful about his future.

He continues to hold Singaporean citizenship and expressed his desire to return to his homeland if the political climate changes.

In a statement posted on his Facebook page, he wrote, “I remain a Singapore citizen and hope that some day it will become safe to return home.”

Singapore’s political system has long been dominated by the Lee family, beginning with LKY, who served as Prime Minister from 1959 to 1990.

His eldest son, Lee Hsien Loong, succeeded him as Prime Minister in 2004 and remained in office until May 2024.

Human rights organisations, including Human Rights Watch, have often criticised Singapore for its repressive measures, noting the country’s strict control over political dissent and freedom of expression.

Based on UN records, LHY and LSF are two of only seven Singaporeans who have been granted refugee status in the UK.

The UN refugee records indicate that as of mid-2024, there were 40 refugees from Singapore globally, with an additional 322 seeking asylum.

As LHY’s case continues to attract international attention, it raises questions about the future of Singapore’s political landscape and the influence of the Lee family within it.

His claims of repression stand in stark contrast to Singapore’s global image as a model of good governance, further complicating the legacy of  LKY and his successors.

Continue Reading

Trending