Connect with us

Economics

Arguments for minimum wage by Prof Lim sound and clear

Published

on

Sharing the video of the interview of Professor Lim Chong Yah by Channel News Asia, Former GIC Chief Economist, Mr Yeoh Lam Keong agreed with Prof Lim’s points about minimum wage, saying that Prof Lim has set out the arguments for the need for a minimum wage in Singapore and how best it should be administered plainly and clearly.

Stating that Prof Lim is right on two counts. “First, a minimum wage is needed to help bring our working poor up to a decent living wage. Second, in many of the countries where a minimum wage works best, it is set, underpinned and updated by a strong and responsible collective bargaining process.” wrote Yeoh.

He then stated that it is high time for Singapore to have a decent minimum wage we can best afford as the working poor desperately need it. “We also have the NWC. Let’s use it to do so.”
He further wrote, “If, at this stage, our companies cannot fully afford a decent living wage, the difference can then the be topped up by the Workfare Income Supplement (WIS). But to do that we need to measure the living wage properly and give out an adequate WIS payout in cash, neither of which we do adequately today even though we can well afford to.”
“Only then can be begin to effectively make poverty history in Singapore. And with dignity.”

A friend of Yeoh, Ngiam Shih-Tung wrote that he remains skeptical about minimum wage.
“There seems to be a confounding of living income and minimum wage. We can argue about the quantums but the various wage supplement schemes are far better than trying to set a wage rate by state edict. The real cause of low wages for unskilled workers is the willingness to import even lower-wage foreign workers.” wrote Ngiam.
In response, Yeoh wrote,

“Yes, the argument that living wage needs should be met by wage supplements (chiefly the WIS) is a valid one
This is especially so in Singapore where two decades of excessive import of unskilled foreign labor have depressed the market unskilled wage below the living wage by so much that if we were to raise minimum wages to the living wage this would severely hurt employment and competitiveness near to medium term
In fact Prof Lim Chong Yah’s original recommendation to rates low wages 50% would have risked having the same effect as the recession in the early 1980s caused by raising wages too quickly
But Prof Lim’s latest more measured recommendation is to set the minimum wage to what employers can generally afford via the NWC.
This is a good recommendation as it avoids an arbitrary minimum wage that might be unrealistic. It thus gives low wage workers more dignity in terms of earning their keep instead of relying on official wage supplements.
However, because we have suppressed unskilled wages so much below the living wage, Prof Lim’s new recommendation may not be enough to eliminate absolute poverty i.e. his new NWC determined minimum wage might still be substantially lower than the living wage.
Hence we probably still need to supplement Prof Lim’s NWC-set minimum wage with significant WIS cash supplements until firms have increase productivity levels such that they can afford to pay a minimum wage closer to the living wage. This might take up to a decade.
The minimum wage administered by NWC though would also serve the function of ensuring employers are constantly doing their part and not reducing wages just because the govt is giving larger WIS payouts
This underscores the need for first, reliable empirical measures of the living wage or absolute poverty measures and second larger cash payouts under WIS until firms can afford to pay a minimum wage closer to the living wage
But I therefore think you need all three policy measures: a NWC administered minimum wage, good poverty measurement and substantial WIS cash payment increases to effectively deal with the structural problem of the working poor which is, after all, an unintended negative consequence of our excessive immigration policy

Continue Reading
1 Comment
Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Economics

Thailand’s household debt reaches record high amid slow economic growth

Thailand’s household debt has surged to a record 606,378 baht per household, driven by slow economic growth and high living costs. A UTCC survey found 71.6% of households struggle to meet repayments. The government is working on measures to alleviate the burden.

Published

on

Thailand’s household debt has soared to a record high, with many citizens struggling to manage loan repayments due to weak economic growth, declining incomes, and rising living costs, according to a recent survey.

The study, conducted by the University of the Thai Chamber of Commerce (UTCC) in early September, revealed an average household debt of 606,378 baht (S$23,600), marking an 8.4% increase from the previous year. This is the highest level of household debt recorded since the survey began in 2009.

The survey highlighted that 69.9% of this debt is attributed to formal lending, a decrease from 80.2% last year, while informal lending has risen to 30%. This shift is largely due to many individuals reaching their borrowing limits from formal financial institutions, forcing them to seek credit from informal sources such as loan sharks.

The study also noted that a significant number of households are facing difficulties meeting their financial obligations, with monthly debt payments averaging 18,787 baht, up from 16,742 baht the previous year. The delinquency rate stands at 71.6%.

The growing household debt is placing pressure on Thailand’s economy, the second largest in Southeast Asia, which is already grappling with high borrowing costs and sluggish exports amid a slow recovery in China, its main trading partner.

Both the government and the Bank of Thailand have raised concerns over the country’s total household debt, which reached 16.4 trillion baht, or 90.8% of gross domestic product (GDP), at the end of March 2024—one of the highest levels in Asia. The central bank has introduced measures aimed at reducing this ratio to 89% by next year.

For comparison, International Monetary Fund (IMF) data from 2022 shows household debt as a percentage of GDP at 67% in Malaysia and 48.6% in Singapore.

The UTCC survey, which polled 1,300 respondents from 1-7 September, found that the majority had experienced challenges repaying debt over the past year and expected to continue facing difficulties in the coming year.

UTCC President Thanavath Phonvichai expressed concern over the long-standing debt problem, stating that household debt is primarily incurred for daily expenses, housing, vehicles, and business operations, and does not necessarily undermine the overall economy. He added that the situation would improve once the domestic economy returns to strong growth.

In response to the debt crisis, the Federation of Thai Industries has reduced its 2024 target for domestic vehicle sales by 200,000 units to 550,000, citing high household debt and stricter lending conditions as key factors reducing demand.

Finance Minister Pichai Chunhavajira emphasized the urgency of addressing household debt and urged the Bank of Thailand to provide more support to retail borrowers. He also mentioned plans to engage with banks to explore further assistance measures for debtors.

Thailand’s newly appointed Prime Minister, Paetongtarn Shinawatra, has pledged to stimulate the economy immediately.

On Monday, the government announced plans to distribute 145 billion baht to state welfare cardholders starting next week.

This is part of a broader “digital wallet” program aimed at providing financial relief to up to 50 million people, although it now appears much of the support will be disbursed in cash.

Continue Reading

AFP

Top rice supplier India bans some exports

India, the world’s largest rice exporter, bans non-basmati white rice exports to ensure domestic availability and tackle rising prices amid global food crises, potentially impacting rice-dependent nations.

Published

on

MUMBAI, INDIA —  The world’s biggest rice exporter India has banned some overseas sales of the grain “with immediate effect”, the government said, in a move that could drive international prices even higher.

Rice is a major world food staple and prices on international markets have soared to decade highs as the world grappled with the Covid pandemic, the war in Ukraine and the impact of the El Nino weather phenomenon on production levels.

India would ban exports of non-basmati white rice — which accounts for around a quarter of its total — the consumer affairs and food ministry said.

The move would “ensure adequate availability” and “allay the rise in prices in the domestic market”, it said in a statement late Thursday.

India accounts for more than 40 percent of all global rice shipments, so the decision could “risk exacerbating food insecurity in countries highly dependent on rice imports”, data analytics firm Gro Intelligence said in a note.

Countries expected to be hit by the ban include African nations, Turkey, Syria, and Pakistan — all of them already struggling with high food-price inflation — the firm added.

Global demand saw Indian exports of non-basmati white rice jump 35 percent year-on-year in the second quarter, the ministry said.

The increase came even after the government banned broken rice shipments and imposed a 20 percent export tax on white rice in September.

India exported 10.3 million tonnes of non-basmati white rice last year and Rabobank senior analyst Oscar Tjakra said alternative suppliers did not have spare capacity to fill the gap.

“Typically the major exporters are Thailand, Vietnam, and to some extent Pakistan and the US,” he told AFP. “They won’t have enough supply of rice to replace these.”

Moscow’s cancellation of the Black Sea grain deal that protected Ukrainian exports has already led to wheat prices creeping up, he pointed out.

“Obviously this will add to inflation around the world because rice can be used as a substitute for wheat.”

Rice prices in India rose 14-15 per cent in the year to March and the government “clearly viewed these as red lines from a domestic food security and inflation point of view”, rating agency Crisil’s research director Pushan Sharma said in a note.

India had already curbed exports of wheat and sugar last year to rein in prices.

— AFP

Continue Reading

Trending