Connect with us

Current Affairs

为何何晶的薪资形同“国家机密”?

Published

on

截至3月31日,淡马锡控股的年度财政报告称一年股东回报率大幅下挫。据年度报告指出,其股东回报率仅为1.49巴仙,较去年的12巴仙有大幅度的下降。

淡马锡董事长林文兴表示,“我们持续关注各国走势如美国经济衰退、英国脱欧、欧洲各国政治分裂等情况,至于亚洲如中国并未完全重组其经济,达长期可持续性的经济目标。”

“各国经济趋势对全球氛围和长期可持续增长率具有重大的影响。”他说。

淡马锡控股于去年的财政年度实施较多的撤资计划,舍弃了280亿新元的资产,同时也增持了240亿新元。

然而,最被新加坡人民关心的并不是淡马锡控股的走势,而是淡马锡首席执行长何晶谜一般的薪水。对此,你无法在报告中找到任何相关资讯。

总理李显龙弟李显扬于周三(10日)在脸书上发文表示,“淡马锡控股的年度报告昨日(9日)出炉。对于何晶的薪资仍未透露并不感到意外,不过为什么会成为如此神秘的秘密?”

人民之声党主席林鼎也于脸书上发文指出报告中的疏漏,他认为截至今日,何晶的薪资仍未被公开,这是非常“荒谬”的事情。他质问,“对此,我国的透明度和问责制到底起了什么作用?”

林鼎也回应了总理日前要求不公开何晶薪资的要求,认为该课题应该提呈国会进行辩论。

林鼎也质问,“我国的主权财富基金(亦指淡马锡控股)的总裁和所有高层其薪资难道不能向股东,也就是新加坡公民公开并进行审议?”

早在五月份,我们在一篇文章中指出,根据新加坡公司法,淡马锡是一家获得豁免权的私人公司,意味着公司不需要提供任何经法定审议的综合财务报表,淡马锡控股甚至在官方网站上贴出说明。

因此,他们是无任何义务告诉我们关于首席执行长何晶的薪资。

尽管淡马锡一直拒绝透露首席执行长的薪酬,但仍然可从中分析出一些端倪。部落客Phillip Ang曾在去年6月时推测何晶的薪酬可能达年薪1亿元。

他认为既然淡马锡控股被视为是私营公司,其首席执行长薪资可能会与收入最高者并列,相比同行的首席执行长应该来得更高。

Phillip 以其他企业的首席执行长年度薪资和2009年担任淡马锡控股首席执行长的顾之博薪资做比较。当年顾之博还在必和必拓公司时已有5400万年薪,所以可想而知淡马锡会提供更高薪资邀请顾之博担任淡马锡控股的首席执行长。同样地,何晶被委任时以5400万年薪为基准,意味着她日薪为14万7945新元,已是总理薪资的25倍。若干年后,淡马锡控股如今的投资组合在何晶的管理下已翻倍,表示他可能会比以往赚得更多。

挪威主权基金CEO薪酬公开

基于以上准则,Phillip预估何晶日薪可能达30万新元,而年薪可能达一亿。

对于如淡马锡控股的主权财富基金而言,隐瞒其高官的真实薪资一行为确实令人费解。如同林鼎所说,主权财富基金的股东来自新加坡人民,他们有权力知道淡马锡控股如何使用人民所付出的钱财,包括淡马锡控股如何支付工作人员的薪资。

其他国家如挪威,他们的主权财富基金公开管理费,其投资组合达1.49兆新元,其中有0.05巴仙是管理费,包括首席执行长的薪资,约7亿5000万元。根据他们提供的数据,我们非常清楚知道首席执行长的薪酬以及其主权财富基金的投资组合。

在今年五月,工人党后港选区议员方荣发将此事提呈国会,特别针对淡马锡控股与新加坡政府投资公司,其高层的薪酬上限,以及该两家企业的三名最高薪酬为何,他在提问之时也要求将薪资与红利公开。

黄循财:政府不干涉GIC淡马锡运营政策

财政部第二部长黄循财则以政府“未干涉两间公司的运营决策”回避问题。黄循财辩称政府认为公司对内部工作人员有监管问责之责,故将行政决定权交还给公司内部。

黄循财续指,“政府更注重的是公司的长期回报率而非公司内部的开销。”

然而,黄循财则说,部分的工资因随着长期的工作表现与行业标准而进行调整,并支持“审慎管理风险文化(prudent risk-taking culture)”

如你所见,部长黄循财并没有正面回答问题,对于一个国家主权财富基金的首席执行长何晶,我们仍然无法得知他所获得薪酬,也对薪酬如此保密的行为感到相当疑惑。

Continue Reading
Click to comment
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Current Affairs

Ng Eng Hen: Dust clouds likely caused armoured vehicle collision during Exercise Wallaby

Dust clouds limiting visibility likely contributed to the collision between two Hunter vehicles during Exercise Wallaby, Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen explained in his parliamentary reply. 12 servicemen sustained mild injuries, but safety measures prevented more serious outcomes. A formal investigation is ongoing to ensure further safety improvements.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Low visibility caused by dust clouds was identified as the likely cause of the collision between two Hunter armoured fighting vehicles (AFVs) during Exercise Wallaby last month, Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen said in a written parliamentary response on Tuesday (15 October).

The incident, which occurred in Queensland, Australia, on 24 September 2024, resulted in mild injuries to 12 servicemen.

Dr Ng’s statement was in response to a parliamentary question from Mr Dennis Tan, Workers’ Party Member of Parliament for Hougang SMC.

Mr Tan asked for details on the accident, specifically its cause and whether any lessons could be applied to enhance training and operational safety within the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF).

The collision took place during a night-time movement of Hunter AFVs at the Shoalwater Bay Training Area.

The vehicles were returning to base when one rear-ended another. Dr Ng explained that the dust clouds generated by the AFVs’ movement significantly impaired visibility, might likely contributing to the accident.

The 12 affected servicemen sustained mild injuries and were promptly taken to the nearest medical facility.

None of the injuries required hospitalisation, and all 12 servicemen were able to rejoin their units for training the next day.

According to the minister, adherence to safety protocols—such as wearing seat belts and protective gear—played a crucial role in limiting the injuries to mild ones.

Following the incident, a safety pause was immediately implemented, with all drivers being reminded to maintain proper safety distances, especially when visibility was compromised.

Troops were also reminded to adhere strictly to safety protocols, including the proper use of safety equipment, Dr Ng added.

The safety lessons from the incident were shared not only with the affected units but also with other participating groups in the exercise, as well as units back in Singapore, through dedicated safety briefings.

Mr Tan also asked about the broader implications of the incident. In his response, Dr Ng said that a formal investigation had been launched in accordance with SAF’s safety incident protocol.

The investigation aims to assess the circumstances more thoroughly and identify any further measures that could be taken to enhance safety.

Dr Ng shared that recommendations arising from the investigation will be implemented where necessary.

Exercise Wallaby is SAF’s largest unilateral overseas exercise, and the 2024 edition began on 8 September, running until 3 November.

The exercise involves approximately 6,200 personnel, including 500 operationally ready national servicemen.

The exercise has been conducted at Shoalwater Bay Training Area in Queensland since 1990, and it is a key part of SAF’s overseas training program.

The Hunter AFV, one of the vehicles involved in the collision, is a state-of-the-art platform jointly developed by the Defence Science and Technology Agency, the Singapore Army, and ST Engineering.

It replaced the SAF’s aging fleet of Ultra M113 AFVs in 2019, which had been in service since the 1970s. The Hunter is equipped with advanced features, including a 30mm cannon, a 76mm smoke grenade launcher, and an automatic target detection and

tracking system designed to enhance operational effectiveness. It is also capable of traveling at increased speeds and covering longer distances, making it a versatile asset for the SAF.

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

Government to “carefully consider” Lee Hsien Yang’s demolition application for 38 Oxley Road

The Singapore Government will “carefully consider” Mr Lee Hsien Yang (LHY)’s application to demolish the house at 38 Oxley Road. LHY announced his intent on Tuesday morning following the recent death of his sister, Dr Lee Wei Ling, reaffirming his commitment to honour his parents’ wish for the house’s demolition.

Published

on

The Singapore Government has indicated that it will “carefully consider” Mr Lee Hsien Yang’s (LHY) application to demolish the family home at 38 Oxley Road.

LHY, the youngest son of Singapore’s founding Prime Minister, the late Lee Kuan Yew (LKY), announced his intention to apply for the demolition in a Facebook post on 15 October 2024, following the death of his sister, Dr Lee Wei Ling, on 9 October.

The announcement marks a significant development in the ongoing saga over the fate of the historically significant property, which has been at the heart of a family dispute since LKY’s passing in 2015.

In his will, executed in December 2013, LKY expressed his desire for the house to be demolished “immediately after” Dr Lee moved out of the property. Dr Lee, a prominent neurologist, had been the last remaining resident of the house.

LHY reaffirmed his commitment to carrying out his father’s wishes, stating, “After my sister’s passing, I am the only living executor of my father’s estate. It is my duty to carry out his wishes to the fullest extent of the law.”

He added that he would seek to build a small private dwelling on the site, which would be “held within the family in perpetuity”.

LHY also referenced his brother, Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (LHL) remarks in Parliament in 2015, when he was Prime Minister, stating that upon Dr Lee’s passing, the decision to demolish the house would rest with the “Government of the day.”

In response to media queries regarding LHY’s announcement, a spokesperson for the Ministry of National Development (MND) acknowledged the intended application and emphasised that the Government would “carefully consider issues related to the property in due course”.

The spokesperson also highlighted that any decision would need to balance LKY’s wishes, public interest, and the historical value of the house.

The house at 38 Oxley Road, where key decisions about Singapore’s path to independence were made, has been a focal point of public and political discussion.

The future of the house became contentious in 2017 when LHY and Dr Lee publicly accused their elder brother, LHL, of trying to preserve the house against their father’s wishes for political reasons.

LHL denied the accusations, issuing a Ministerial Statement in Parliament, where he also raised concerns over the preparation of their father’s final will. He clarified that he had recused himself from all decisions regarding the property and affirmed that any government action would be impartial.

In 2018, a “secret” ministerial committee, which was formed in 2016 to study the future of 38 Oxley Road, proposed three options: preserving the property and designating it as a national monument, partially demolishing the house while retaining the historically significant basement dining room, or allowing complete demolition for redevelopment. LHL accepted the committee’s conclusions but stated that no immediate decision was necessary, as Dr Lee was still living in the house.

In a statement conveyed by LHY on behalf of Dr Lee after her passing, she reiterated her strong support for her father’s wish to demolish the house. “My father, Lee Kuan Yew, and my mother, Kwa Geok Choo, had an unwavering and deeply felt wish for their house at 38 Oxley Road to be demolished upon the last parent’s death,” the statement read.

She added, “He had also appealed directly to the people of Singapore. Please honour my father by honouring his wish for his home to be demolished.”

Despite selling the house to LHY at market value in 2015, LHL’s stance regarding the house’s preservation became a public issue, especially after the family disclosed that the Government had raised concerns about reinstating the demolition clause in the 2013 will. The ministerial committee had reviewed the matter, but a final decision was deferred until now.

The fate of 38 Oxley Road remains to be seen, but the Government’s decision will likely have lasting implications for the legacy of the Lee family and the conservation of Singapore’s historical landmarks.

Continue Reading

Trending