Connect with us

Current Affairs

毒品调查:至亲染毒瘾 或影响孩子仿效接触毒品

Published

on

“我真的很好奇,我想要尝试,但我从没想过原来会连累我孩子。”

这是阿菲(译名)的故事,从小他看着自己的哥哥吸食毒品,18岁时,他开始接触毒品,希望获得哥哥的认同。

从此踏入毒品的深渊,无法自拔,过去30年内,他无法戒毒,最后还连累自己的孩子,孩子竟然在青少年时期开始吸毒。

毒品泛滥一直充斥着社会,许多人因此掉入毒品的火坑,让自己沉迷在毒品中,久久无法自拔,却从未曾想过,自己的行为对家庭或孩子带来连带的影响,将孩子也一同拉入火坑中。

家庭内有毒犯可能使孩子重蹈覆辙

《海峡时报》报道,尽管没有官方数字可以证明,毒犯的小孩亦会重蹈覆辙,开始做些和毒品相关行为,但专家发现许多毒犯,其家庭历史亦有吸毒者存在,部分吸毒者年仅10岁便开始吸毒,对吸毒者而言,这就像是无法逃脱的跨世代循环。

卫生部兼内政部高级政务次长安宁·阿敏表示,“当孩子的成长环境内有毒犯的家人,孩子从小会在充满毒品的环境中长大,从而使孩子更容易接触毒品,长大后也会重蹈覆辙。”

针对毒犯家庭的处遇,民间也设立许多团体与组织如Acorn Quest、Reach Community Services 、We Care Community Services等,协助青少年毒犯或毒犯家庭回归正常生活。他们均认为若孩子从小目睹家长,甚至是祖父母滥用毒品,将可能视毒品为“家族活动”,理所当然地开始使用毒品。

此外,许多民间团体亦表示,孩子视家长为楷模,也会学习他们的应对机制(coping mechanism)。一般使用毒品的成人将毒品视为应对机制,他们在使用毒品后可能会成为更友善,故孩子也会有样学样,学习成人的应对机制,开始使用毒品。

应对机制指人在适应、解决问题和接受考验时采用的所有方法。

We Care Community Services与戒毒所也认同以上观点表示,“一般家庭内有毒犯家长的家庭,其家庭关系较为疏离与自律性较低,他们很容易受同侪的影响,而使用毒品的家长或许无法适时表达情绪,而孩子最后只能转向依赖毒品寻求慰籍,故在处遇上,应视滥用毒品为家庭问题。”

《海峡时报》记者访问一些曾经陷入毒品生活的毒犯,他们均表示,在成长期间,其父母或祖父母就在他们面前吸食毒品,甚至将毒品随意乱放,让孩子随处可得。

仍有孩子相当抗拒毒品

当然,尽管孩子在充斥着毒品的环境下,耳濡目染,也开始沾上毒品,但仍部分孩子因见证毒品如何摧毁家庭,故而强烈抗拒毒品。

许多相关的民间团体如We Care Community Services和Dare Centre亦说明,孩子虽然在长期充斥毒品的环境下,很可能会开始滥用毒品,但他们也曾见证孩子极力抗拒毒品的存在。

“有些孩子可能亲眼见证毒品的杀伤力以及如何摧毁家庭,因此使他们鄙视毒品。” Dare Centre的副执行长尼古拉斯·赛伯特(译名,Nicholas Sibert)。

对此,专家表示,早期介入治疗不仅仅是为了要帮助高风险的孩子,更应针对整个家庭提供协助如精神状况或经济困难。

安宁·阿敏表示,“早期加入治疗针对高风险孩子是必要的支持,社区则在这其中扮演支持毒犯家庭,方能减少跨时代相传的风险。”

如今54岁的阿菲(译名),曾因吸毒两次入狱,最终在戒毒所内寻求协助,成功戒毒。

“我想要改变我的生活,成为一个好榜样”,他说,而阿菲的31岁儿子最近也成功戒毒。尽管他们的案例是成功的,但他表示 ,他身边的亲朋好友包括他的侄子仍受困其中,他的61岁哥哥近日还因吸毒而入狱。

Continue Reading
Click to comment
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Current Affairs

TJC issued 3rd POFMA order under Minister K Shanmugam for alleged falsehoods

The Transformative Justice Collective (TJC) was issued its third POFMA correction order on 5 October 2024 under the direction of Minister K Shanmugam for alleged falsehoods about death penalty processes. TJC has rejected the government’s claims, describing POFMA as a tool to suppress dissent.

Published

on

The Transformative Justice Collective (TJC), an advocacy group opposed to the death penalty, was issued its third Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA) correction direction on 5 October 2024.

The correction was ordered by Minister for Home Affairs and Law, K Shanmugam, following TJC’s publication of what the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) alleges to be false information regarding Singapore’s death row procedures and the prosecution of drug trafficking cases.

These statements were made on TJC’s website and across its social media platforms, including Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and X (formerly Twitter).

In addition to TJC, civil activist Kokila Annamalai was also issued a correction direction by the minister over posts she made on Facebook and X between 4 and 5 October 2024.

According to MHA, these posts echoed similar views on the death penalty and the legal procedures for drug-related offences, and contained statements that the ministry claims are false concerning the treatment of death row prisoners and the state’s legal responsibilities in drug trafficking cases.

MHA stated that the posts suggested the government schedules and stays executions arbitrarily, without due regard to legal processes, and that the state does not bear the burden of proving drug trafficking charges.

However, these alleged falsehoods are contested by MHA, which maintains that the government strictly follows legal procedures, scheduling executions only after all legal avenues have been exhausted, and that the state always carries the burden of proof in such cases.

In its official release, MHA emphasised, “The prosecution always bears the legal burden of proving its case beyond a reasonable doubt, and this applies to all criminal offences, including drug trafficking.”

It also pointed to an article on the government fact-checking site Factually to provide further clarification on the issues raised.

As a result of these allegations, both TJC and Annamalai are now required to post correction notices. TJC must display these corrections on its website and social media platforms, while Annamalai is required to carry similar notices on her Facebook and X posts.

TikTok has also been issued a targeted correction direction, requiring the platform to communicate the correction to all Singapore-based users who viewed the related TJC post.

In a statement following the issuance of the correction direction, TJC strongly rejected the government’s claims. The group criticised the POFMA law, calling it a “political weapon used to crush dissent,” and argued that the order was more about the exercise of state power than the pursuit of truth. “We have put up the Correction Directions not because we accept any of what the government asserts, but because of the grossly unjust terms of the POFMA law,” TJC stated.

TJC further argued that the government’s control over Singapore’s media landscape enables it to push pro-death penalty views without opposition. The group also stated that it would not engage in prolonged legal battles over the POFMA correction orders, opting to focus on its abolitionist work instead.

This marks the third time TJC has been subject to a POFMA correction direction in recent months.

The group was previously issued two orders in August 2024 for making similar statements concerning death row prisoners.

In its latest statement, MHA noted that despite being corrected previously, TJC had repeated what the ministry views as falsehoods.

MHA also criticised TJC for presenting the perspective of a convicted drug trafficker without acknowledging the harm caused to victims of drug abuse.

Annamalai, a prominent civil rights activist, is also known for her involvement in various social justice campaigns. She was charged in June 2024 for her participation in a pro-Palestinian procession near the Istana. Her posts, now subject to correction, contained information similar to those presented by TJC regarding death penalty procedures and drug-related cases.

POFMA, which was introduced in 2019, allows the government to issue correction directions when it deems falsehoods are being spread online.

Critics of the law argue that it can be used to suppress dissent, while the government asserts that it is a necessary tool for combating misinformation. The law has been frequently invoked against opposition politicians and activists.

As of October 2024, Minister K Shanmugam has issued 17 POFMA directions, more than any other minister. Shanmugam, who was instrumental in introducing POFMA, is followed by National Development Minister Desmond Lee, who has issued 10 POFMA directions.

Major media outlets, including The Straits Times, Channel News Asia, and Mothership, have covered the POFMA directions. However, as of the time of writing, none have included TJC’s response rejecting the government’s allegations.

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

Hotel Properties Limited suspends trading ahead of Ong Beng Seng’s court hearing

Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has halted trading ahead of his court appearance today (4 October). The announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at about 7.45am, citing a pending release of an announcement. Mr Ong faces one charge of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts and another charge of obstruction of justice. He is due in court at 2.30pm.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), the property and hotel developer co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has requested a trading halt ahead of the Singapore tycoon’s scheduled court appearance today (4 October) afternoon.

This announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at approximately 7.45am, stating that the halt was due to a pending release of an announcement.

Mr Ong, who serves as HPL’s managing director and controlling shareholder, faces one charge under Section 165, accused of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts, as well as one charge of obstruction of justice.

He is set to appear in court at 2.30pm on 4 October.

Ong’s charges stem from his involvement in a high-profile corruption case linked to former Singaporean transport minister S Iswaran.

The 80-year-old businessman was named in Iswaran’s initial graft charges earlier this year.

These charges alleged that Iswaran had corruptly received valuable gifts from Ong, including tickets to the 2022 Singapore Formula 1 Grand Prix, flights, and a hotel stay in Doha.

These gifts were allegedly provided to advance Ong’s business interests, particularly in securing contracts with the Singapore Tourism Board for the Singapore GP and the ABBA Voyage virtual concert.

Although Iswaran no longer faces the original corruption charges, the prosecution amended them to lesser charges under Section 165.

Iswaran pleaded guilty on 24 September, 2024, to four counts under this section, which covered over S$400,000 worth of gifts, including flight tickets, sports event access, and luxury items like whisky and wines.

Additionally, he faced one count of obstructing justice for repaying Ong for a Doha-Singapore flight shortly before the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) became involved.

On 3 October, Iswaran was sentenced to one year in jail by presiding judge Justice Vincent Hoong.

The prosecution had sought a sentence of six to seven months for all charges, while the defence had asked for a significantly reduced sentence of no more than eight weeks.

Ong, a Malaysian national based in Singapore, was arrested by CPIB in July 2023 and released on bail shortly thereafter. Although no charges were initially filed against him, Ong’s involvement in the case intensified following Iswaran’s guilty plea.

The Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) had earlier indicated that it would soon make a decision regarding Ong’s legal standing, which has now led to the current charges.

According to the statement of facts read during Iswaran’s conviction, Ong’s case came to light as part of a broader investigation into his associates, which revealed Iswaran’s use of Ong’s private jet for a flight from Singapore to Doha in December 2022.

CPIB investigators uncovered the flight manifest and seized the document.

Upon learning that the flight records had been obtained, Ong contacted Iswaran, advising him to arrange for Singapore GP to bill him for the flight.

Iswaran subsequently paid Singapore GP S$5,700 for the Doha-Singapore business class flight in May 2023, forming the basis of his obstruction of justice charge.

Mr Ong is recognised as the figure who brought Formula One to Singapore in 2008, marking the first night race in the sport’s history.

He holds the rights to the Singapore Grand Prix. Iswaran was the chairman of the F1 steering committee and acted as the chief negotiator with Singapore GP on business matters concerning the race.

 

Continue Reading

Trending