Connect with us

Current Affairs

MP Zainal: $700 a month enough for a Bangla worker to buy land back home

Published

on

At a roundtable on wages organised by ST on Friday (30 Nov), five panellists were invited to talk about Singapore’s wage model. The five, former labour chief Lim Boon Heng, Ambassador-at-Large Tommy Koh, labour MP Zainal Sapari, and employers, Mr Kurt Wee and Mr Daniel Thong, sparred on the various labour issues.

At one point, Dr Koh mentioned that workers at the bottom of the pyramid earn very low wages because they’re competing against one million low-wage workers from other countries.

It was clear that Dr Koh was referring to Singaporean workers at the lower strata competing with the low-wage foreign workers currently working in Singapore, since indeed, according to MOM data, there were already some 966,200 foreign workers on work permit working in Singapore as at Jun 2018.

Dr Koh continued, “A brilliant Palestinian blogger, Nas, recently had a series of videos on Singapore, one of which was called Crazy Poor Asians, and his point is Singaporeans are not rich and the average Singaporean is just getting by.”

“And he made the point that the average wage of the foreign workers in Singapore is only $600 a month, and he worked it out – less than US$2 (S$2.70) per hour – and he asked: Why is it so low? And he answered his own question – because there is no minimum wage in Singapore,” Dr Koh added.

“So the reason why people at the bottom of the pyramid earn such low wages (is) because they’re competing against a million low-paid workers from the region (working in Singapore).”

MP Zainal: We have in place policies to mitigate

MP Zainal then went into the usual government’s rhetoric on the need for foreign workers.

He said, “We have to realise that we need the foreign workers to supplement our workforce. While the presence of the foreign workers does impact wages in Singapore, we have in place policies to mitigate.”

“For example, in the cleaning industry, you cannot hire as many cleaners as you want because there is a quota system which is actually enforced. Likewise, even for the S Pass, there is a quota system which is enforced,” he added.

Strangely, instead of going into details exploring if government’s mitigation has been enough to raise the average wage of Singaporean low-wage workers, MP Zainal went on to defend that the $600 a month salary is actually enough for foreign workers.

He countered Dr Koh, “And when Prof Tommy Koh mentioned that you have many foreign cleaners, and they are earning less than $600 per month, I think on the part of NTUC, we hold the perspective that the wages that you pay must be seen to be fair, and fair doesn’t mean it has to be the same.”

MP Zainal seems to forget the issue of agent fees that his Bangla worker has to pay

MP Zainal said that in fact, $700 a month was enough for a Bangla worker to buy land back home.

He explained, “I recall when I was working in my town council, I met with one of my cleaning supervisors and he was earning around $700, and he was sharing with me that he has been working there for maybe – if I’m not mistaken – six years, yet he managed to buy two parcels of land back in Bangladesh – something which I don’t think is possible for a worker in Singapore.”

What MP Zainal said, is very anecdotal and skeptical to say the least.

In an investigative report that TOC did in 2014 where foreign cleaners were allegedly sent back after refusing to pay their company money to stay in Singapore, the cleaners were indeed paid $700 a month but it was for 7 days a week, with the workers claiming to work from 5am till 10pm or later each day.

The workers had to pay for all expenses less the accommodation for the three years that they had worked in Singapore and had paid a sum of $10,500 when they first came over to Singapore. Subsequently they paid another sum of $2,500 to extend their stay here for another one year. So according to them, they paid a total sum of $13,000 to work for the period of three years.

MP Zainal was the MP in charge of the area. After TOC raised the matter to the MP and sent him evidence of the contractor admitting to the collection of agent fees, he threw the matter to MOM and MWC and closed the case from there.

How exactly is a foreign cleaner in his constituency able to buy land when he is subjected to the low wage and excessive charges as described by the workers whom TOC interviewed?

MP Zainal goes on to state,

“And we also have to bear in mind that there are other costs involved in engaging a foreign worker. You just cannot look at the wage cost alone. In fact, I dare say that to hire a foreign cleaner, the total cost is actually higher than to hire a local cleaner. But the companies (are) willing to do it because of a higher productivity level,”

MP Zainal seems to be missing the point altogether. Singaporean workers don’t really care if foreign workers are making enough as market forces would take care of it. If they are paid too lowly, they would simply not take the trouble to come work in Singapore. And even if they were paid too low, as in being conned to come here, they have to still work in order to pay off the debts incurred coming to Singapore due to the agent fees and other expenses.

TOC also understands from the foreigner cleaners who were sent back that there was a few cleaners who were employed by the cleaning company at around 1k a month. 1k a month at that time was the minimum salary which MOM recognise as a full-time worker and allocated foreign worker quota for the Singaporean hired for the company.

As Professor Tommy Koh clearly points out why some Singaporeans earn so little and continue to be poor, “…the reason why people at the bottom of the pyramid earn such low wages (is) that they’re competing against a million low-paid workers from the region,”

Therefore, MP Zainal should answer this question, “are our Singaporean workers being paid enough to live and feed a family in our own home country?”

Continue Reading
Click to comment
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Current Affairs

Ng Eng Hen: Dust clouds likely caused armoured vehicle collision during Exercise Wallaby

Dust clouds limiting visibility likely contributed to the collision between two Hunter vehicles during Exercise Wallaby, Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen explained in his parliamentary reply. 12 servicemen sustained mild injuries, but safety measures prevented more serious outcomes. A formal investigation is ongoing to ensure further safety improvements.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Low visibility caused by dust clouds was identified as the likely cause of the collision between two Hunter armoured fighting vehicles (AFVs) during Exercise Wallaby last month, Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen said in a written parliamentary response on Tuesday (15 October).

The incident, which occurred in Queensland, Australia, on 24 September 2024, resulted in mild injuries to 12 servicemen.

Dr Ng’s statement was in response to a parliamentary question from Mr Dennis Tan, Workers’ Party Member of Parliament for Hougang SMC.

Mr Tan asked for details on the accident, specifically its cause and whether any lessons could be applied to enhance training and operational safety within the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF).

The collision took place during a night-time movement of Hunter AFVs at the Shoalwater Bay Training Area.

The vehicles were returning to base when one rear-ended another. Dr Ng explained that the dust clouds generated by the AFVs’ movement significantly impaired visibility, might likely contributing to the accident.

The 12 affected servicemen sustained mild injuries and were promptly taken to the nearest medical facility.

None of the injuries required hospitalisation, and all 12 servicemen were able to rejoin their units for training the next day.

According to the minister, adherence to safety protocols—such as wearing seat belts and protective gear—played a crucial role in limiting the injuries to mild ones.

Following the incident, a safety pause was immediately implemented, with all drivers being reminded to maintain proper safety distances, especially when visibility was compromised.

Troops were also reminded to adhere strictly to safety protocols, including the proper use of safety equipment, Dr Ng added.

The safety lessons from the incident were shared not only with the affected units but also with other participating groups in the exercise, as well as units back in Singapore, through dedicated safety briefings.

Mr Tan also asked about the broader implications of the incident. In his response, Dr Ng said that a formal investigation had been launched in accordance with SAF’s safety incident protocol.

The investigation aims to assess the circumstances more thoroughly and identify any further measures that could be taken to enhance safety.

Dr Ng shared that recommendations arising from the investigation will be implemented where necessary.

Exercise Wallaby is SAF’s largest unilateral overseas exercise, and the 2024 edition began on 8 September, running until 3 November.

The exercise involves approximately 6,200 personnel, including 500 operationally ready national servicemen.

The exercise has been conducted at Shoalwater Bay Training Area in Queensland since 1990, and it is a key part of SAF’s overseas training program.

The Hunter AFV, one of the vehicles involved in the collision, is a state-of-the-art platform jointly developed by the Defence Science and Technology Agency, the Singapore Army, and ST Engineering.

It replaced the SAF’s aging fleet of Ultra M113 AFVs in 2019, which had been in service since the 1970s. The Hunter is equipped with advanced features, including a 30mm cannon, a 76mm smoke grenade launcher, and an automatic target detection and

tracking system designed to enhance operational effectiveness. It is also capable of traveling at increased speeds and covering longer distances, making it a versatile asset for the SAF.

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

Government to “carefully consider” Lee Hsien Yang’s demolition application for 38 Oxley Road

The Singapore Government will “carefully consider” Mr Lee Hsien Yang (LHY)’s application to demolish the house at 38 Oxley Road. LHY announced his intent on Tuesday morning following the recent death of his sister, Dr Lee Wei Ling, reaffirming his commitment to honour his parents’ wish for the house’s demolition.

Published

on

The Singapore Government has indicated that it will “carefully consider” Mr Lee Hsien Yang’s (LHY) application to demolish the family home at 38 Oxley Road.

LHY, the youngest son of Singapore’s founding Prime Minister, the late Lee Kuan Yew (LKY), announced his intention to apply for the demolition in a Facebook post on 15 October 2024, following the death of his sister, Dr Lee Wei Ling, on 9 October.

The announcement marks a significant development in the ongoing saga over the fate of the historically significant property, which has been at the heart of a family dispute since LKY’s passing in 2015.

In his will, executed in December 2013, LKY expressed his desire for the house to be demolished “immediately after” Dr Lee moved out of the property. Dr Lee, a prominent neurologist, had been the last remaining resident of the house.

LHY reaffirmed his commitment to carrying out his father’s wishes, stating, “After my sister’s passing, I am the only living executor of my father’s estate. It is my duty to carry out his wishes to the fullest extent of the law.”

He added that he would seek to build a small private dwelling on the site, which would be “held within the family in perpetuity”.

LHY also referenced his brother, Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (LHL) remarks in Parliament in 2015, when he was Prime Minister, stating that upon Dr Lee’s passing, the decision to demolish the house would rest with the “Government of the day.”

In response to media queries regarding LHY’s announcement, a spokesperson for the Ministry of National Development (MND) acknowledged the intended application and emphasised that the Government would “carefully consider issues related to the property in due course”.

The spokesperson also highlighted that any decision would need to balance LKY’s wishes, public interest, and the historical value of the house.

The house at 38 Oxley Road, where key decisions about Singapore’s path to independence were made, has been a focal point of public and political discussion.

The future of the house became contentious in 2017 when LHY and Dr Lee publicly accused their elder brother, LHL, of trying to preserve the house against their father’s wishes for political reasons.

LHL denied the accusations, issuing a Ministerial Statement in Parliament, where he also raised concerns over the preparation of their father’s final will. He clarified that he had recused himself from all decisions regarding the property and affirmed that any government action would be impartial.

In 2018, a “secret” ministerial committee, which was formed in 2016 to study the future of 38 Oxley Road, proposed three options: preserving the property and designating it as a national monument, partially demolishing the house while retaining the historically significant basement dining room, or allowing complete demolition for redevelopment. LHL accepted the committee’s conclusions but stated that no immediate decision was necessary, as Dr Lee was still living in the house.

In a statement conveyed by LHY on behalf of Dr Lee after her passing, she reiterated her strong support for her father’s wish to demolish the house. “My father, Lee Kuan Yew, and my mother, Kwa Geok Choo, had an unwavering and deeply felt wish for their house at 38 Oxley Road to be demolished upon the last parent’s death,” the statement read.

She added, “He had also appealed directly to the people of Singapore. Please honour my father by honouring his wish for his home to be demolished.”

Despite selling the house to LHY at market value in 2015, LHL’s stance regarding the house’s preservation became a public issue, especially after the family disclosed that the Government had raised concerns about reinstating the demolition clause in the 2013 will. The ministerial committee had reviewed the matter, but a final decision was deferred until now.

The fate of 38 Oxley Road remains to be seen, but the Government’s decision will likely have lasting implications for the legacy of the Lee family and the conservation of Singapore’s historical landmarks.

Continue Reading

Trending