Connect with us

Current Affairs

教职员受促依行为守则行事 刘慧丽:别成为害群之马

Published

on

教育部提醒教师们,在和学生互动时的行事必须值得他们信任,校方也必须监督,确保教职员依循《教职员行为守则》行事。

当局对所有的教育工作者强调,自他们受委任和进行教师培训开始,就对他们抱有非常高的期望。

教育部教育副总司长(学校)兼学校司司长刘慧丽向《亚洲新闻台》指出,“校方领导层也必须不断监督教职员,依据《教育工作者的专业行为守则》(Code of Professional Conduct for Educators)行事。”

最近听闻的众多杏坛性侵事件包括,一名35岁的男教师因为亲吻14岁学生的嘴唇两次,而在本月3日被判坐牢六个月;8月份,一名41岁男教师因导致15岁学生产子而被判入狱八年;7月份,34岁男教师因和15岁的女学生发生性关系而被判坐牢16个月。

单单在今年内发生的事项中,就有一名29岁的女教师于6月对15岁男学生进行性削剥,而被判入狱两年零九个月;一名36岁男教师于今年4月份性侵和性骚扰学生,因此被判入狱六年零六个月。

刘慧丽指出,尽管当局尽最大的努力筛选、培训和集体努力完成身为教师的使命,但是还是会出现害群之马。

“所有教职员都被提醒要对同行保持警惕心,一旦发现他们有不法或不当行为就必须举报。”

吁家长群向校方直接反馈

她指出,校方管理层已提供有系统的措施,让学生得以投报他们认为“不安全的遭遇”,并且也有校方辅导员在场给予支持。

妇女行动与研究协会(AWARE)性侵犯护理中心助理经理莱卡(Laika Jumabhoy)指出,遭侵犯或虐待的学生也能向他们信任的成年人,如父母或其他教师寻求援助,以阻止情况进一步恶化。

刘慧丽呼吁父母或家长们在面对类似案件时,直接向校方领导层或教育部官员提问和反馈,以便当局展开“彻底和独立”的调查。

“若发现任何不法行为,当局将会采取纪律处分,并且会在发现涉及刑事犯罪时报警。这样就能保证学生的安全,以及我们专业和系统的完整性。”

成年人态度直接影响受害者

但是莱卡认为在谈到性侵或虐待事件时,成年人对儿童的信任至关重要,因为有些成年人会对此表示怀疑、误判和引起怨恨。

“父母或监护人或许很难接受自己的孩子是性虐待受害者,有些人因此而自责,甚至不清楚要如何在实际和情感方面帮助他们的孩子。”

她指出,成年人可能的疏忽会影响受害者,后者将会感到困惑、要求被关注或者行为不端,尤其是在受害者无法清楚传达究竟遭遇了什么的情况下。

“所以我们需要提供更多的公众教育,提升对阐述性暴力现实的诚实度、知情和非判断性的理解,尤其是在学校、相关机构和组织中。”

她表示当涉案者是孩子们熟悉的人,如教师时,受害者大多不愿投报。她在护理中心的工作经验也印证有关事项,十起案件中有七人没有向当局做出投报。

受害者将对一切失去信心

莱卡分享了去年护理中心接获的一宗投报,一名学校担任高层职位的小学教师骚扰其数名学生约一年,其中一名受害者最终向他信任的教师投报,但是她担心此事会影响肇事者的家庭。“她担心当局和其他教师会质疑她,也担心其他同学和教师的反应。”

莱卡表示,在犯罪者多为亲人和熟人,包括教师、教练或宗教师的案件中,受害者可能会因此产生自卑、焦虑、抑郁、自我伤害、难以建立和维持信任关系的问题。

“受害者可能会认为自己是可耻、卑微和肮脏的;认为成年人不值得信赖;这个世界不安全也不稳定,而且他们会感到非常内疚和自责。”

“涉案者的地位让人信任,建立正直社会成员形象,方便他随后进行性骚扰和性虐待行为。而这对受害者带来很强的作用,致使他们在受到伤害后只能保持沉默,觉得没有人会相信他们,因为他们的说辞与拥有地位的涉案者处于对立面。”

莱卡表示在进行辅导工作时,会告诉受害者那不是他们的错,他们有权利选择要前进的方向。

学生应学习如何自保

她披露不会规定受害者的分享,交由对方决定所要阐述的“非常隐私性”对话,包括必须说什么、几时、如何或与谁一起做等。“受害者的主要责任在于他们自己,他们应优先考虑自己的身心健康,以及为了恢复所需要做的事情。”

刘慧丽指出,从更大的角度来看,学生也需要被教导来保护自己。

她指出,低年级学生需要学习如何分辨“好和坏的触碰”,而高年级和中学生则要学会保护自己免受性侵,并且在任何关系中确定身体触碰界限。“我们的学生也需要学会尊重他人,并且尊重他们自己。”

她重申,教育部致力将学校打造成为学生能够学习和茁壮成长的安全场所。

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

Ng Eng Hen: Dust clouds likely caused armoured vehicle collision during Exercise Wallaby

Dust clouds limiting visibility likely contributed to the collision between two Hunter vehicles during Exercise Wallaby, Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen explained in his parliamentary reply. 12 servicemen sustained mild injuries, but safety measures prevented more serious outcomes. A formal investigation is ongoing to ensure further safety improvements.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Low visibility caused by dust clouds was identified as the likely cause of the collision between two Hunter armoured fighting vehicles (AFVs) during Exercise Wallaby last month, Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen said in a written parliamentary response on Tuesday (15 October).

The incident, which occurred in Queensland, Australia, on 24 September 2024, resulted in mild injuries to 12 servicemen.

Dr Ng’s statement was in response to a parliamentary question from Mr Dennis Tan, Workers’ Party Member of Parliament for Hougang SMC.

Mr Tan asked for details on the accident, specifically its cause and whether any lessons could be applied to enhance training and operational safety within the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF).

The collision took place during a night-time movement of Hunter AFVs at the Shoalwater Bay Training Area.

The vehicles were returning to base when one rear-ended another. Dr Ng explained that the dust clouds generated by the AFVs’ movement significantly impaired visibility, might likely contributing to the accident.

The 12 affected servicemen sustained mild injuries and were promptly taken to the nearest medical facility.

None of the injuries required hospitalisation, and all 12 servicemen were able to rejoin their units for training the next day.

According to the minister, adherence to safety protocols—such as wearing seat belts and protective gear—played a crucial role in limiting the injuries to mild ones.

Following the incident, a safety pause was immediately implemented, with all drivers being reminded to maintain proper safety distances, especially when visibility was compromised.

Troops were also reminded to adhere strictly to safety protocols, including the proper use of safety equipment, Dr Ng added.

The safety lessons from the incident were shared not only with the affected units but also with other participating groups in the exercise, as well as units back in Singapore, through dedicated safety briefings.

Mr Tan also asked about the broader implications of the incident. In his response, Dr Ng said that a formal investigation had been launched in accordance with SAF’s safety incident protocol.

The investigation aims to assess the circumstances more thoroughly and identify any further measures that could be taken to enhance safety.

Dr Ng shared that recommendations arising from the investigation will be implemented where necessary.

Exercise Wallaby is SAF’s largest unilateral overseas exercise, and the 2024 edition began on 8 September, running until 3 November.

The exercise involves approximately 6,200 personnel, including 500 operationally ready national servicemen.

The exercise has been conducted at Shoalwater Bay Training Area in Queensland since 1990, and it is a key part of SAF’s overseas training program.

The Hunter AFV, one of the vehicles involved in the collision, is a state-of-the-art platform jointly developed by the Defence Science and Technology Agency, the Singapore Army, and ST Engineering.

It replaced the SAF’s aging fleet of Ultra M113 AFVs in 2019, which had been in service since the 1970s. The Hunter is equipped with advanced features, including a 30mm cannon, a 76mm smoke grenade launcher, and an automatic target detection and

tracking system designed to enhance operational effectiveness. It is also capable of traveling at increased speeds and covering longer distances, making it a versatile asset for the SAF.

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

Government to “carefully consider” Lee Hsien Yang’s demolition application for 38 Oxley Road

The Singapore Government will “carefully consider” Mr Lee Hsien Yang (LHY)’s application to demolish the house at 38 Oxley Road. LHY announced his intent on Tuesday morning following the recent death of his sister, Dr Lee Wei Ling, reaffirming his commitment to honour his parents’ wish for the house’s demolition.

Published

on

The Singapore Government has indicated that it will “carefully consider” Mr Lee Hsien Yang’s (LHY) application to demolish the family home at 38 Oxley Road.

LHY, the youngest son of Singapore’s founding Prime Minister, the late Lee Kuan Yew (LKY), announced his intention to apply for the demolition in a Facebook post on 15 October 2024, following the death of his sister, Dr Lee Wei Ling, on 9 October.

The announcement marks a significant development in the ongoing saga over the fate of the historically significant property, which has been at the heart of a family dispute since LKY’s passing in 2015.

In his will, executed in December 2013, LKY expressed his desire for the house to be demolished “immediately after” Dr Lee moved out of the property. Dr Lee, a prominent neurologist, had been the last remaining resident of the house.

LHY reaffirmed his commitment to carrying out his father’s wishes, stating, “After my sister’s passing, I am the only living executor of my father’s estate. It is my duty to carry out his wishes to the fullest extent of the law.”

He added that he would seek to build a small private dwelling on the site, which would be “held within the family in perpetuity”.

LHY also referenced his brother, Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (LHL) remarks in Parliament in 2015, when he was Prime Minister, stating that upon Dr Lee’s passing, the decision to demolish the house would rest with the “Government of the day.”

In response to media queries regarding LHY’s announcement, a spokesperson for the Ministry of National Development (MND) acknowledged the intended application and emphasised that the Government would “carefully consider issues related to the property in due course”.

The spokesperson also highlighted that any decision would need to balance LKY’s wishes, public interest, and the historical value of the house.

The house at 38 Oxley Road, where key decisions about Singapore’s path to independence were made, has been a focal point of public and political discussion.

The future of the house became contentious in 2017 when LHY and Dr Lee publicly accused their elder brother, LHL, of trying to preserve the house against their father’s wishes for political reasons.

LHL denied the accusations, issuing a Ministerial Statement in Parliament, where he also raised concerns over the preparation of their father’s final will. He clarified that he had recused himself from all decisions regarding the property and affirmed that any government action would be impartial.

In 2018, a “secret” ministerial committee, which was formed in 2016 to study the future of 38 Oxley Road, proposed three options: preserving the property and designating it as a national monument, partially demolishing the house while retaining the historically significant basement dining room, or allowing complete demolition for redevelopment. LHL accepted the committee’s conclusions but stated that no immediate decision was necessary, as Dr Lee was still living in the house.

In a statement conveyed by LHY on behalf of Dr Lee after her passing, she reiterated her strong support for her father’s wish to demolish the house. “My father, Lee Kuan Yew, and my mother, Kwa Geok Choo, had an unwavering and deeply felt wish for their house at 38 Oxley Road to be demolished upon the last parent’s death,” the statement read.

She added, “He had also appealed directly to the people of Singapore. Please honour my father by honouring his wish for his home to be demolished.”

Despite selling the house to LHY at market value in 2015, LHL’s stance regarding the house’s preservation became a public issue, especially after the family disclosed that the Government had raised concerns about reinstating the demolition clause in the 2013 will. The ministerial committee had reviewed the matter, but a final decision was deferred until now.

The fate of 38 Oxley Road remains to be seen, but the Government’s decision will likely have lasting implications for the legacy of the Lee family and the conservation of Singapore’s historical landmarks.

Continue Reading

Trending