Connect with us

Current Affairs

Deactivated NUSSU – Students United page admins strongly disagree with allegations by K Shan's press secretary that they are 'anti-religious'

Published

on

Last weekend, Facebook removed the NUSSU – NUS Students United Facebook page. The tech giant said that the page was removed as it violated the platforms “authenticity policies”.
Following a post of theirs going viral, Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam’s press secretary, Goh Chour Tong released a statement alleging that the people behind the page are “anti-religious” and are “bent on sowing hatred and discord”.
The people behind the page responded that they strongly disagree with those allegations, adding that “No reasonable or right thinking person would come to the conclusion that Press Secretary Goh came to.”
The page had earlier made headlines when it shared an infographic about People’s Action Party (PAP) member Rachel Ong’s affiliations with a religious-leaning group on 17 November. The image had a photo of Ms Ong and an arrow to the left showing her connection to the PAP as a member of the party serving in the Telok Blangah branch, and that she might be a new political candidate for the party.
And arrow to the right shows her connection as the founder and CEO of a consultancy firm called the ROHEI Corporation which includes the ROHEI Foundation. The image quotes an excerpt from the foundation’s website which is a verse from the bible.
At the bottom of the image, the NUSSU called for Ms Ong to resign her executive positions in the organisation. It said, “If Ms Ong wishes to run for elections, she must resign ALL executive positions with ROHEI, an organisation with religious leanings.”
It added, “Non executive advisory positions are fine though.”
In the caption accompanying the image, the page quoted the late Lee Kuan Yew who said in his 1987 National Day Rally speech, “Churchmen, lay preachers, priests, monks, Muslim theologians, all those who claim divine sanctions of holy insights, take off your clerical robes before you take on anything economic or political. Take it off”
Also included in the image was a quote attributed to Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam which said: “If we do not separate religion from politics, then whose religion comes into politics?”

“No integrity”, says K Shan’s press secretary

As the post started to gain traction online, Mr Shanmugam’s press secretary, Mr Goh, came out to say on Friday (22 November) that the post had “misleadingly quoted” the minister and that it “directly contradicted” what he actually said in Parliament on 7 October.
Mr Goh, also took a shot at the people behind the NUSSU – NUS Student’s United Facebook page, saying that they have “no integrity” and are “bent on sowing discord and hatred”.
He said, “The minister had in fact said that Members of Parliament (MPs), even ministers, can hold positions in religious organisations.”
He clarified that the minister did not say that political candidates seeking office should resign for all executive positions in organisations with religious leaning, but rather that they can continue to hold such positions and that these things should be dealt with wisdom and common sense.
Mr Goh added that the quote on separation of religion and politics as set out in the Facebook post relates to a different point Mr Shanmugam made in which he asserted that religious beliefs should not be the foundation of public policymaking.
“That is quite different from saying that MPs should resign from all positions, in organisations with religious leanings,” said Mr Goh.
“As the minister said in Parliament, all persons, including religious leaders, have civil and political rights.”
As for the quote of LKY’s speech, Mr Goh said that it was taken “out of context to further mislead” and to falsely assert that he had meant religious leaders has no political rights.
“Mr Lee was actually saying that religious leaders who wanted to make political statements should not do so in their capacity as religious leaders. Instead, they should enter the political arena as politicians, and give their views,” said Mr Goh, adding that Singapore is secular, not anti-religious.
“We do not have an established or official religion. Nor do we allow anyone to use his or her religion for political purposes, or any group to promote a religion in the political arena. But this doesn’t mean we are anti-religion or that we disallow people of faith from participating in politics.”
Mr Goh then went on to address the page itself, saying that it is neither the official page of the NUS student union nor an affiliate page.
He said, “The name, which appears to have been disingenuously chosen, may lead readers to assume that the views espoused on the page are being expressed by NUS and/or its students.”
“The public ought to be discerning of those who launch such attacks from behind the anonymity of the Internet,” he added, saying that those who launch such attacks should not peddle falsehoods or mislead people, but rather should be more ethical and transparent.
“Be transparent also about your political leanings, so that readers can judge for themselves what weight to place on your views,” he said.

NUSSU – NUS Students United responds to allegations

In a press release of their own, the administrators of the now-deactivated Facebook page said they “strongly disagree” with the press secretary Mr Goh’s assertion that they are “anti-religion” and are “bent on sowing hatred and discord”.
Addressing the deactivation, the administrators of the page said that the involuntary deactivation of the page is “maybe the most optimal sub-optimal outcome for all”.
They explained that this means “The Minister doesn’t have to explicitly take responsibility for the words in his press secretary’s statement, or make his press secretary the fall guy” and that “Facebook doesn’t have to go into a messy content evaluation case.”
This outcome, they said, also means that “People baying for blood got their bloodlust somewhat satisfied,” adding that “The government made their point known and this has helped hasten Facebook’s decision to cut off our access to a readily accessible pool of social media audience.”
Finally, they also noted that the image they posted showing Ms Ong’s organisational affiliations have spread widely through mainstream media though the Minister did not dispute the validity of their points.
They said, “We find solace that neither the minister nor his press secretary impugned any of our points about Ms Rachel Ong and her organisational affiliations.”
Adding that they do not blame Facebook for its decision, the administrators said, “It [Facebook] has been an indulgent host for our page for more than a year We always knew at the back of our heads that the indulgence will end someday, so for Facebook to pull the trigger based on community guidelines and giving everyone an exit strategy, we are grateful to them.”
The statement later said, “The ironic thing is that our page got canned after we did the 2 most pro government actions: agree with a government principle of politics-religion separation and pinning the blame on the press secretary instead of the Minister.”
They added, “We have repeatedly said that every politician has the right to religion. Just don’t one foot step two boats: political organisation and religious organisation. If supporting the principles of the 1989 White Paper on the Maintenance of Religious Harmony (especially in paragraph 28) is “sowing hatred and discord”, we don’t know what to say.”

Facebook: deactivated due to violation of authenticity policies, not content

On Facebook’s side, a spokesperson responding to queries told TODAY that the page for deactivated for violating the platform’s ‘authenticity policies’ which say that people are not allowed to misrepresent themselves, use fake accounts or artificially boost the popularity of its content.
“This policy is intended to create a space where people can trust the people and communities they interact with,” said Facebook.
Said the spokesperson: “We have removed the fake accounts, causing the page to be unpublished,” the spokesperson said. “This was the reason for the page being unpublished, not (because of the) content that was posted on the page.”

NUSSU – Students United, no stranger to headlines

The now-defunct page has made headlines in the past with their posts on controversial matters, from asserting that two out of three medical students at NUS come from the top three elite schools in the country to putting up a poll asking people to vote on who they think would make a better Secretary General for the Singapore Democratic Party.
In relation to the sexual harassment case which blew up earlier this year involving a couple of NUS students and the subsequent debate on NUS policies and handling of such cases, the unofficial NUS alumni group page had also shared a list of the NUS Board of Discipline cases from 2016 to 2018.

Continue Reading
Click to comment
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Current Affairs

Ng Eng Hen: Dust clouds likely caused armoured vehicle collision during Exercise Wallaby

Dust clouds limiting visibility likely contributed to the collision between two Hunter vehicles during Exercise Wallaby, Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen explained in his parliamentary reply. 12 servicemen sustained mild injuries, but safety measures prevented more serious outcomes. A formal investigation is ongoing to ensure further safety improvements.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Low visibility caused by dust clouds was identified as the likely cause of the collision between two Hunter armoured fighting vehicles (AFVs) during Exercise Wallaby last month, Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen said in a written parliamentary response on Tuesday (15 October).

The incident, which occurred in Queensland, Australia, on 24 September 2024, resulted in mild injuries to 12 servicemen.

Dr Ng’s statement was in response to a parliamentary question from Mr Dennis Tan, Workers’ Party Member of Parliament for Hougang SMC.

Mr Tan asked for details on the accident, specifically its cause and whether any lessons could be applied to enhance training and operational safety within the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF).

The collision took place during a night-time movement of Hunter AFVs at the Shoalwater Bay Training Area.

The vehicles were returning to base when one rear-ended another. Dr Ng explained that the dust clouds generated by the AFVs’ movement significantly impaired visibility, might likely contributing to the accident.

The 12 affected servicemen sustained mild injuries and were promptly taken to the nearest medical facility.

None of the injuries required hospitalisation, and all 12 servicemen were able to rejoin their units for training the next day.

According to the minister, adherence to safety protocols—such as wearing seat belts and protective gear—played a crucial role in limiting the injuries to mild ones.

Following the incident, a safety pause was immediately implemented, with all drivers being reminded to maintain proper safety distances, especially when visibility was compromised.

Troops were also reminded to adhere strictly to safety protocols, including the proper use of safety equipment, Dr Ng added.

The safety lessons from the incident were shared not only with the affected units but also with other participating groups in the exercise, as well as units back in Singapore, through dedicated safety briefings.

Mr Tan also asked about the broader implications of the incident. In his response, Dr Ng said that a formal investigation had been launched in accordance with SAF’s safety incident protocol.

The investigation aims to assess the circumstances more thoroughly and identify any further measures that could be taken to enhance safety.

Dr Ng shared that recommendations arising from the investigation will be implemented where necessary.

Exercise Wallaby is SAF’s largest unilateral overseas exercise, and the 2024 edition began on 8 September, running until 3 November.

The exercise involves approximately 6,200 personnel, including 500 operationally ready national servicemen.

The exercise has been conducted at Shoalwater Bay Training Area in Queensland since 1990, and it is a key part of SAF’s overseas training program.

The Hunter AFV, one of the vehicles involved in the collision, is a state-of-the-art platform jointly developed by the Defence Science and Technology Agency, the Singapore Army, and ST Engineering.

It replaced the SAF’s aging fleet of Ultra M113 AFVs in 2019, which had been in service since the 1970s. The Hunter is equipped with advanced features, including a 30mm cannon, a 76mm smoke grenade launcher, and an automatic target detection and

tracking system designed to enhance operational effectiveness. It is also capable of traveling at increased speeds and covering longer distances, making it a versatile asset for the SAF.

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

Government to “carefully consider” Lee Hsien Yang’s demolition application for 38 Oxley Road

The Singapore Government will “carefully consider” Mr Lee Hsien Yang (LHY)’s application to demolish the house at 38 Oxley Road. LHY announced his intent on Tuesday morning following the recent death of his sister, Dr Lee Wei Ling, reaffirming his commitment to honour his parents’ wish for the house’s demolition.

Published

on

The Singapore Government has indicated that it will “carefully consider” Mr Lee Hsien Yang’s (LHY) application to demolish the family home at 38 Oxley Road.

LHY, the youngest son of Singapore’s founding Prime Minister, the late Lee Kuan Yew (LKY), announced his intention to apply for the demolition in a Facebook post on 15 October 2024, following the death of his sister, Dr Lee Wei Ling, on 9 October.

The announcement marks a significant development in the ongoing saga over the fate of the historically significant property, which has been at the heart of a family dispute since LKY’s passing in 2015.

In his will, executed in December 2013, LKY expressed his desire for the house to be demolished “immediately after” Dr Lee moved out of the property. Dr Lee, a prominent neurologist, had been the last remaining resident of the house.

LHY reaffirmed his commitment to carrying out his father’s wishes, stating, “After my sister’s passing, I am the only living executor of my father’s estate. It is my duty to carry out his wishes to the fullest extent of the law.”

He added that he would seek to build a small private dwelling on the site, which would be “held within the family in perpetuity”.

LHY also referenced his brother, Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (LHL) remarks in Parliament in 2015, when he was Prime Minister, stating that upon Dr Lee’s passing, the decision to demolish the house would rest with the “Government of the day.”

In response to media queries regarding LHY’s announcement, a spokesperson for the Ministry of National Development (MND) acknowledged the intended application and emphasised that the Government would “carefully consider issues related to the property in due course”.

The spokesperson also highlighted that any decision would need to balance LKY’s wishes, public interest, and the historical value of the house.

The house at 38 Oxley Road, where key decisions about Singapore’s path to independence were made, has been a focal point of public and political discussion.

The future of the house became contentious in 2017 when LHY and Dr Lee publicly accused their elder brother, LHL, of trying to preserve the house against their father’s wishes for political reasons.

LHL denied the accusations, issuing a Ministerial Statement in Parliament, where he also raised concerns over the preparation of their father’s final will. He clarified that he had recused himself from all decisions regarding the property and affirmed that any government action would be impartial.

In 2018, a “secret” ministerial committee, which was formed in 2016 to study the future of 38 Oxley Road, proposed three options: preserving the property and designating it as a national monument, partially demolishing the house while retaining the historically significant basement dining room, or allowing complete demolition for redevelopment. LHL accepted the committee’s conclusions but stated that no immediate decision was necessary, as Dr Lee was still living in the house.

In a statement conveyed by LHY on behalf of Dr Lee after her passing, she reiterated her strong support for her father’s wish to demolish the house. “My father, Lee Kuan Yew, and my mother, Kwa Geok Choo, had an unwavering and deeply felt wish for their house at 38 Oxley Road to be demolished upon the last parent’s death,” the statement read.

She added, “He had also appealed directly to the people of Singapore. Please honour my father by honouring his wish for his home to be demolished.”

Despite selling the house to LHY at market value in 2015, LHL’s stance regarding the house’s preservation became a public issue, especially after the family disclosed that the Government had raised concerns about reinstating the demolition clause in the 2013 will. The ministerial committee had reviewed the matter, but a final decision was deferred until now.

The fate of 38 Oxley Road remains to be seen, but the Government’s decision will likely have lasting implications for the legacy of the Lee family and the conservation of Singapore’s historical landmarks.

Continue Reading

Trending