Connect with us

Current Affairs

MPs raise concerns over MEWR’s effort in waste management

Published

on

During the Committee of Supply 2020 Debate in Parliament on Wednesday (4 March), several Members of Parliament (MP) raised their concerns and issues over the Ministry of Environment and Water Resources (MEWR)’s effort in managing waste in order to move towards to a Zero Waste nation.

As part of encouraging Singaporeans to work together toward being a zero-waste country, the government had earlier designated 2019 as the Year Towards Zero Waste and outlined the Zero Waste Masterplan for the citizens to be engaged in to “great effect”.

To this, Workers’ Party MP Chen Show Mao asked MEWR for a review and update on the results of the Zero Waste Masterplan during the parliament session.

Packaging waste

In his speech, Tanjong Pagar Group Representation Constituency (GRC) MP Dr Chia Shi-Lu raised his concerns on packaging waste, which formed a significant portion of domestic waste.

He pointed out that the country is “totally potential” to develop more measures in reducing packaging and plastic waste when he cited the National Environment Agency (NEA)’s statistics showing that 55% of packaging waste is made up of plastic, and only 4% of plastic waste is recyclable.

Noting that MEWR implemented the Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) framework to deal with packaging waste including plastic, Dr Chia requested the ministry to share the details of how NEA plans to enforce the EPR framework.

Other than the EPR framework, MEWR also introduced the mandatory reporting of packaging data and development of 3R plans framework for involved companies. The framework will commence on 1 July.

With the upcoming regulations, Nominated MP Mohamed Irshad asked if MEWR will provide any support and measures for the involved companies to ensure the accuracy of data that has been given.

E-waste

During the Parliamentary session, Dr Chia also noted that the amount of e-waste generated in Singapore seems to increase every year.

Concerned about the growing amount of e-waste, Dr Chia and Mr Irshad posed the same question to MEWR, asking if the government has sufficient local recycling capability to process the expected volume of e-waste as well as provide other measures to ensure the proper treatment and responsible disposal of all collected e-waste.

Mr Irshad also asked about the progress of EPR framework, such as the number of operators who have applied or have been licensed to collect and treat e-waste, and if MEWR would consider expanding the framework beyond e-waste.

Food waste

Additionally, it was noted that the owners and occupiers of commercial and industrial premises that generate a large amount of food waste will be required to segregate their food waste for treatment from 2024.

Speaking on this, Mr Irshad questioned whether MEWR has determined the scope of affected premises and taken any measures to help the industry comply with the following regulations.

Single-use bag charge

Nee Soon GRC MP Louis Ng suggested that MEWR introduce a single-use bag charge as it has been successful in reducing the usage of single-use plastic bags in countries that have adopted a plastic bag charge.

In this note, he cited the example of England, saying, “In England, there was a 90% reduction. It was estimated that every person is using 10 bags in the most recent year, compared with 140 bags in 2014 before the charge was introduced.”

He also proposed to make the single-use bag charge mandatory for large retailers and optional for smaller businesses while waiving the charge when it comes to plastic bags for fresh food and meat items.

Use of styrofoam products

Workers’ Party (WP) NCMP Dennis Tan Lip Fong mentioned that styrofoam products are still widely used for food crockery and packaging at hawker centres and food outlets in the country.

Highlighting that the government has opted to discourage hawkers from using disposable ware instead of banning styrofoam products outright, Mr Tan, therefore, said, “I would like to ask for an update of the rate of use of styrofoam products in food crockery and packaging vis-a-vis other materials since 2016.”

He also asked the government whether it will review the use of styrofoam products for food crockery and packaging, and set a target to ban the use of such products or take measures to reduce the usage.

In addition, he also suggested that the government consider using bamboo products as an alternative to single-use products.

Government’s effort in recycling

Moving on, WP NCMP Daniel Goh Pei Siong noted that Singapore fails in the effort of domestic recycling, where the recycling rate is stuck at a dismal 21 to 22%.

Mr Goh suggested that the government change the National Recycling Programme to community-led recycling as a new strategy to foster the domestic recycling rate.

Citing examples in Germany, South Korea, and Taiwan, he said that the recycling programmes, as well as culture and norms of recycling, become entrenched in their communities.

Therefore, he suggested the Singapore grassroots organisations to take ownership by monitoring the recycling trends of each HDB block, diagnosing problems such as the low rate of recycling and organising campaigns to educate block residents.

Speaking on recycling, MP for Tanjong Pagar GRC Joan Pereira raised the issue of recycling bins at HDB blocks which are often overfilled, causing the residents to end up leaving the items around the bins.

Considering some items do not fit into the bins, she requested MEWR to increase the size of recycling bins and improve its design to something more user-friendly, or allocate more bins to each HDB block.

Continue Reading
Click to comment
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Current Affairs

Ng Eng Hen: Dust clouds likely caused armoured vehicle collision during Exercise Wallaby

Dust clouds limiting visibility likely contributed to the collision between two Hunter vehicles during Exercise Wallaby, Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen explained in his parliamentary reply. 12 servicemen sustained mild injuries, but safety measures prevented more serious outcomes. A formal investigation is ongoing to ensure further safety improvements.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Low visibility caused by dust clouds was identified as the likely cause of the collision between two Hunter armoured fighting vehicles (AFVs) during Exercise Wallaby last month, Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen said in a written parliamentary response on Tuesday (15 October).

The incident, which occurred in Queensland, Australia, on 24 September 2024, resulted in mild injuries to 12 servicemen.

Dr Ng’s statement was in response to a parliamentary question from Mr Dennis Tan, Workers’ Party Member of Parliament for Hougang SMC.

Mr Tan asked for details on the accident, specifically its cause and whether any lessons could be applied to enhance training and operational safety within the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF).

The collision took place during a night-time movement of Hunter AFVs at the Shoalwater Bay Training Area.

The vehicles were returning to base when one rear-ended another. Dr Ng explained that the dust clouds generated by the AFVs’ movement significantly impaired visibility, might likely contributing to the accident.

The 12 affected servicemen sustained mild injuries and were promptly taken to the nearest medical facility.

None of the injuries required hospitalisation, and all 12 servicemen were able to rejoin their units for training the next day.

According to the minister, adherence to safety protocols—such as wearing seat belts and protective gear—played a crucial role in limiting the injuries to mild ones.

Following the incident, a safety pause was immediately implemented, with all drivers being reminded to maintain proper safety distances, especially when visibility was compromised.

Troops were also reminded to adhere strictly to safety protocols, including the proper use of safety equipment, Dr Ng added.

The safety lessons from the incident were shared not only with the affected units but also with other participating groups in the exercise, as well as units back in Singapore, through dedicated safety briefings.

Mr Tan also asked about the broader implications of the incident. In his response, Dr Ng said that a formal investigation had been launched in accordance with SAF’s safety incident protocol.

The investigation aims to assess the circumstances more thoroughly and identify any further measures that could be taken to enhance safety.

Dr Ng shared that recommendations arising from the investigation will be implemented where necessary.

Exercise Wallaby is SAF’s largest unilateral overseas exercise, and the 2024 edition began on 8 September, running until 3 November.

The exercise involves approximately 6,200 personnel, including 500 operationally ready national servicemen.

The exercise has been conducted at Shoalwater Bay Training Area in Queensland since 1990, and it is a key part of SAF’s overseas training program.

The Hunter AFV, one of the vehicles involved in the collision, is a state-of-the-art platform jointly developed by the Defence Science and Technology Agency, the Singapore Army, and ST Engineering.

It replaced the SAF’s aging fleet of Ultra M113 AFVs in 2019, which had been in service since the 1970s. The Hunter is equipped with advanced features, including a 30mm cannon, a 76mm smoke grenade launcher, and an automatic target detection and

tracking system designed to enhance operational effectiveness. It is also capable of traveling at increased speeds and covering longer distances, making it a versatile asset for the SAF.

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

Government to “carefully consider” Lee Hsien Yang’s demolition application for 38 Oxley Road

The Singapore Government will “carefully consider” Mr Lee Hsien Yang (LHY)’s application to demolish the house at 38 Oxley Road. LHY announced his intent on Tuesday morning following the recent death of his sister, Dr Lee Wei Ling, reaffirming his commitment to honour his parents’ wish for the house’s demolition.

Published

on

The Singapore Government has indicated that it will “carefully consider” Mr Lee Hsien Yang’s (LHY) application to demolish the family home at 38 Oxley Road.

LHY, the youngest son of Singapore’s founding Prime Minister, the late Lee Kuan Yew (LKY), announced his intention to apply for the demolition in a Facebook post on 15 October 2024, following the death of his sister, Dr Lee Wei Ling, on 9 October.

The announcement marks a significant development in the ongoing saga over the fate of the historically significant property, which has been at the heart of a family dispute since LKY’s passing in 2015.

In his will, executed in December 2013, LKY expressed his desire for the house to be demolished “immediately after” Dr Lee moved out of the property. Dr Lee, a prominent neurologist, had been the last remaining resident of the house.

LHY reaffirmed his commitment to carrying out his father’s wishes, stating, “After my sister’s passing, I am the only living executor of my father’s estate. It is my duty to carry out his wishes to the fullest extent of the law.”

He added that he would seek to build a small private dwelling on the site, which would be “held within the family in perpetuity”.

LHY also referenced his brother, Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (LHL) remarks in Parliament in 2015, when he was Prime Minister, stating that upon Dr Lee’s passing, the decision to demolish the house would rest with the “Government of the day.”

In response to media queries regarding LHY’s announcement, a spokesperson for the Ministry of National Development (MND) acknowledged the intended application and emphasised that the Government would “carefully consider issues related to the property in due course”.

The spokesperson also highlighted that any decision would need to balance LKY’s wishes, public interest, and the historical value of the house.

The house at 38 Oxley Road, where key decisions about Singapore’s path to independence were made, has been a focal point of public and political discussion.

The future of the house became contentious in 2017 when LHY and Dr Lee publicly accused their elder brother, LHL, of trying to preserve the house against their father’s wishes for political reasons.

LHL denied the accusations, issuing a Ministerial Statement in Parliament, where he also raised concerns over the preparation of their father’s final will. He clarified that he had recused himself from all decisions regarding the property and affirmed that any government action would be impartial.

In 2018, a “secret” ministerial committee, which was formed in 2016 to study the future of 38 Oxley Road, proposed three options: preserving the property and designating it as a national monument, partially demolishing the house while retaining the historically significant basement dining room, or allowing complete demolition for redevelopment. LHL accepted the committee’s conclusions but stated that no immediate decision was necessary, as Dr Lee was still living in the house.

In a statement conveyed by LHY on behalf of Dr Lee after her passing, she reiterated her strong support for her father’s wish to demolish the house. “My father, Lee Kuan Yew, and my mother, Kwa Geok Choo, had an unwavering and deeply felt wish for their house at 38 Oxley Road to be demolished upon the last parent’s death,” the statement read.

She added, “He had also appealed directly to the people of Singapore. Please honour my father by honouring his wish for his home to be demolished.”

Despite selling the house to LHY at market value in 2015, LHL’s stance regarding the house’s preservation became a public issue, especially after the family disclosed that the Government had raised concerns about reinstating the demolition clause in the 2013 will. The ministerial committee had reviewed the matter, but a final decision was deferred until now.

The fate of 38 Oxley Road remains to be seen, but the Government’s decision will likely have lasting implications for the legacy of the Lee family and the conservation of Singapore’s historical landmarks.

Continue Reading

Trending