Connect with us

Business

MP Jamus Lim explains why imposing environment tax on SIA can be more “economically efficient” at this time

Published

on

Earlier on Tuesday (6 Oct), Transport Minister Ong Ye Kung said in Parliament that he will not contemplate imposing an environment tax on Singapore Airlines (SIA) at this time, as indicated by the Workers’ Party (WP) Member of Parliament (MP) for Sengkang GRC Jamus Lim.

The Minister revealed that both Changi Airport Group (CAG) and SIA are in “deep crisis” due to the global travel restrictions amid the coronavirus pandemic.

Mr Ong said that with SIA having recorded its largest-ever quarterly loss on record in the first quarter of its 2020 financial year, the company is “trying its best to reduce cash burn, preserve core capabilities, and explore all ways to generate revenue”.

Assoc Prof Lim asked him to clarify on why he would not consider imposing an environment tax as it is “entirely possible” that the tax will not have an immediate concern on the economic viability if SIA is able to pass on the cost to consumers.

“I wonder whether it is possible to consider mechanisms where the environmental needs – of both the country and the world – need not be a casualty through business considerations,” he continued.

In response, Mr Ong noted that SIA is in the state of a crisis and is likely to have gone under if not for its recent recapitalization exercise.

“SIA, as I mentioned, is ferrying 1.5 per cent of its passenger volume so it’s not about passing the cost to passengers – there are no passengers to pass [the tax] to now.”

“This is really not the time now to talk about an environmental tax on SIA. If I were to do that, I think there’s Chinese saying… I would’ve made the situation much worse for SIA. It means, someone fell into the well, and you throw a stone to make the situation worse,” he remarked.

https://web.facebook.com/theonlinecitizen/videos/637509583823136

Assoc Prof Lim took to his Facebook on the same day to further explain why he believes imposing an environmental tax on SIA could help support the airline at this time.

According to him, an environmental tax would constitute “an indirect transfer” from passengers, who are willing to take a flight to nowhere, to SIA workers.

“The alternative would have been a direct bailout (as is currently the case), which also involves a tax (the expenditure of taxpayer monies).

“Alternatively, such a tax could be funded from certain cost savings, perhaps from berthing rights in foreign airports (since the planes won’t need to land there), leaving total ticket costs the same. This still involves some redistribution, but from foreign airport revenues to SIA,” the WP’s member asserted.

Assoc Prof Lim said imposing tax may be more economically efficient at this time because flights to nowhere offer one important benefit that usually accrues to travel, which is, “the welfare gains of the hundreds of passengers who get to enjoy the experience of being in a new country”.

“Given these forgone benefits, the environmental costs loom much larger.”

He continued, “More generally, I was hoping to spur some creative thinking about how we can help ensure the future viability of our national airline, without compromising the need to pay attention to the environment, too. I think such creative thinking is necessary to ensure that we don’t spend our hard-earned reserves in an unwise fashion.”

Continue Reading
5 Comments
Subscribe
Notify of
5 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Business

Income Insurance respects government’s decision to halt Allianz deal, reviews next steps

Income Insurance Limited has acknowledged the Singapore government’s concerns and decision to halt its proposed partnership with Allianz Europe B.V. The company expressed respect for the government’s direction and emphasised its commitment to reviewing next steps while considering upcoming amendments to the Insurance Act.

Published

on

Income Insurance Limited has responded to the Singapore government’s decision to halt its proposed transaction with Allianz Europe B.V., a deal that would have seen Allianz acquire a 51% stake in the insurer for S$2.2 billion (approximately US$1.6 billion).

On 14 October 2024, the company stated it “respects the Government’s direction” and appreciates the recognition of its strategic efforts, noting that it will work closely with stakeholders to evaluate its next steps in light of forthcoming changes to the Insurance Act.

In its statement, Income Insurance said, “Income Insurance notes and respects the Government’s direction. Income Insurance appreciates the Government’s understanding of the strategic purpose behind Income Insurance’s corporatisation exercise in 2022 and acknowledgement that the partnership with Allianz was to strengthen Income Insurance’s position for the long run.”

The company acknowledged the government’s concerns about the structure of the transaction and the need for legislative amendments to provide a clear statutory basis for reviewing similar applications in the future.

The company further recognised the conditional nature of Allianz’s voluntary cash offer, noting that it is “pre-conditional and subject to regulatory approval.”

Following the latest developments, Income Insurance committed to reviewing the proposed amendments to the Insurance Act and stated, “Income Insurance will review and take into consideration the forthcoming amendments to the Insurance Act and work closely with relevant stakeholders to study and decide on the next course of action.”

Government’s Concerns

The government’s decision to block the deal was relayed by Edwin Tong, Singapore’s Minister for Culture, Community, and Youth, who cited concerns over how the transaction might affect Income Insurance’s ability to fulfil its social mission.

While the government acknowledged the strategic importance of Income’s corporatisation in 2022, it expressed concerns about the proposed capital extraction that would follow Allianz’s acquisition.

This capital reduction could significantly reduce Income Insurance’s capacity to continue providing affordable insurance to low-income Singaporeans.

Mr Tong highlighted that Income’s corporatisation in 2022 was enabled by an exemption from Section 88 of the Co-operative Societies Act, which allowed the company to retain an S$2 billion surplus for financial strengthening.

However, the proposed Allianz deal’s capital reduction seemed to contradict this intention. Without a clear, legally binding plan to safeguard this surplus for Income’s social mission, the government was unwilling to approve the deal.

Despite blocking the current transaction, the Singapore government has left the door open for future partnerships involving Income Insurance and potential external investors. Mr Tong clarified that the government’s objection was not to Allianz itself but to the terms and structure of the proposed deal, particularly its impact on Income’s ability to fulfil its social mission.

“The government’s view is not that NTUC Income should not seek partnerships or external capital; rather, we must ensure that any deal preserves NTUC Income’s ability to fulfil its social mission and does not undermine the cooperative movement as a whole,” Mr Tong stated.

Public Response and Opposition

The public and several prominent figures had voiced concerns following the announcement of the deal in July 2024. The proposal for Allianz to acquire a majority stake in Income Insurance raised fears that the insurer’s social objectives could be undermined by profit-driven motives typical of large multinational corporations.

The public outcry centred on concerns that Allianz, as a global insurer, might not share the same commitment to affordable insurance as Income Insurance, which had been serving Singapore’s working-class population for decades.

Critics were particularly worried that Allianz’s ownership could lead to increased insurance premiums, which might put essential services out of reach for Income’s lower-income clients.

Former NTUC Income CEO Tan Kin Lian expressed concerns about the potential shift in NTUC Income’s priorities, stating that the proposed deal could undermine its original purpose.

Similarly, ambassador-at-large Tommy Koh and former Group CEO of NTUC Enterprise Tan Suee Chieh voiced their opposition.

Mr Tan Suee Chieh went as far as to call the deal a “breach of good faith” and urged government regulators to intervene.

NTUC Income, Singapore’s one and only insurance co-operative, was corporatised in 2022 into Income Insurance Limited “to achieve operational flexibility and gain access to strategic growth options to compete on an equal footing with other insurers locally and regionally”.

Shareholders were assured at the 2022 annual general meeting that NTUC Enterprise will continue to be the majority shareholder of the new company post-corporatisation.

Continue Reading

Business

OrangeTee, JustCo partner to empower agents and clients with coworking solutions

OrangeTee & Tie has partnered with JustCo to provide property advisers with enhanced access to flexible workspaces. The collaboration, formalised on 27 September 2024, aims to equip advisers with industry insights and access to JustCo’s network of coworking centres, enabling them to better serve commercial clients.

Published

on

Singapore’s leading proptech agency OrangeTee & Tie (OrangeTee) has signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with JustCo, Asia’s leading flexible workspace provider.

The partnership between both parties was inked on 27 September 2024 at the BMW Eurokars Experience Centre.

The collaboration between OrangeTee and JustCo further opens doors to creating more opportunities for OrangeTee’s property advisers, enabling them to “thrive and deliver greater value to their clients”, said a media release issued on 8 October.

As part of the partnership, there will be a series of seminars hosted by JustCo, focusing on the latest trends within the coworking space industry.

These seminars would equip OrangeTee agents with valuable insights to better serve their clients who are interested in flexible office solutions.

This partnership between both parties aims to benefit the property advisers focusing on the commercial client sector as they delve deeper into the industry insights of the office leasing sector in Singapore.

Beyond knowledge sharing, the property advisers will also have access to JustCo’s network of coworking centres across the Asia Pacific to get first-hand experience of the benefits of coworking spaces such as networking opportunities, greater flexibility, and access to a wide range of amenities.

Justin Quek, CEO of OrangeTee said, “This partnership goes beyond business.

“It empowers our property advisers to provide more comprehensive and flexible solutions to their clients, aligning with the evolving needs of modern workspaces.

“By offering JustCo’s vibrant and collaborative environments, our agents can help clients find the ideal spaces for their different business requirements.”

OrangeTee’s property advisers can enjoy a range of perks as part of the partnership.

This includes preferential rates for JustCo’s membership plans which will give them access to over 40 JustCo centres in Singapore and APAC.

With the flexibility to work from anywhere, JustCo’s membership is a dynamic alternative to support their business needs and provides them with opportunities to network and collaborate within the larger commercial community.

Kong Wan Long, Co-founder and Chief Commercial Officer of JustCo said, “Partnering with OrangeTee expands our agency network, allowing us to work with experts who thoroughly understand the property market in Singapore.

“This will allow us to tap into a wider base of potential clients, providing them with greater access to premium coworking spaces that foster productivity and collaboration.

“This collaboration reinforces our commitment to making workspaces more accessible and empowering businesses of all sizes to thrive in an environment tailored to their needs.”

JustCo has the largest footprint in Singapore with 20 coworking spaces in the Central Business District, East and West regions, including the prestigious Marina One office development and Changi Airport Terminal 3.

From January to September 2024, JustCo experienced a 20% increase in enquiries compared to the same period in 2023, highlighting a growing demand for coworking spaces in Singapore. Earlier this year, JustCo also opened a new centre at Hong Leong Building and 108 Robinson Road.

Chipson Ma, one of the long-service property advisers with OrangeTee since 2000, said, “Founded in 2000, OrangeTee has empowered property advisers with cutting-edge technology for over two decades.

“Tools like our online agent portal (Work@Home) and AgentApp allow agents to work seamlessly from anywhere. Our partnership with JustCo further enhances flexibility, providing agents access to coworking spaces they can also market to clients.

“This added convenience elevates the value of our services.”

The partnership with JustCo is the latest to be announced by the proptech leader.

Only recently, OrangeTee also partnered with automotive technology solutions, Motorist, which allowed OrangeTee clients to gain more leverage on their personal vehicle via Motorist while allowing agents and their clients to have access to various perks from the Motorist Premium membership.

This includes car refinancing options to reduce their clients’ total debt servicing ratio and improve their property loan eligibility.

In mid-September, OrangeTee was also the presenting sponsor for The Home Expo 2024 which brought together more than 12,000 property agents, homeowners, industry experts, and exhibitors to the Suntec City Singapore Exhibition and Convention Centre.

Continue Reading

Trending