Connect with us

Community

GrabFood rider loses day’s worth of earning in 2 minutes after bike gets wheel clamped while making delivery to condo

Published

2 years ago

on

SINGAPORE —  A GrabFood delivery rider never expected he would lose a whole day worth of hard-earned money within just two minutes for having his bike clamped by a condominium’s security after parking near residential lift lobby to make his delivery.

Mr Gan Huan Bin,a Grabfood rider shared a post in GrabFood Delivery Rider Singapore Group to alert other riders about the need to park at designated area when delivering food to Skyvue condominium located along Bishan Street 15, or risk losing a whole day’s earning.

“It was a heavy rain during yesterday (20 December) evening and I park at level 1 carpark Skyvue condominium for sending food at level 1 unit. Just 2 minutes my tyre get lock, ” Mr Gan wrote.

“My one day earning gone.” Mr Gan added.

He shared the receipt issued by the condo’s management company, Savills Property Management Pte Ltd which states la penalty of S$214 to unlock the wheel clamp on his bike:

Security guard said complaint received from resident

When interviewed by Shin Min Daily, Mr Gan recalled that he made the delivery that evening during a heavy downpour. He said the security guard instructed him to park near the refuse bin area when he arrived at the condo.

However, as the area was unsheltered and Mr Gan worried that the customer’s food which packed in paper bags might get wet under heavy rain, hence he decided to enter the car park on the first floor instead.

“I was thinking it would not take too long. The customer stayed on the first floor, I could just go in and hand them the food, ” said Mr Gan and he therefore parked his bike near the residential lift lobby and left to make the delivery.

But just 2 minutes later when Mr Gan returned, he saw the security guards clamping the wheel of his bike. The guard told Mr Gan that he received complaint from a resident.

Mr Gan had no choice but to pay S$214 to unlock his wheel to continue his delivery work.

“Earnings of the day not enought to compensate the unclamping fee”

Mr Gan told Shin Min that he is a full-time GrabFood delivery rider.

He estimate that he can earn around S$200 if he starts working at 6am and ends at 9pm.

“I started working a little later that day, so the earnings of the day weren’t enough to compensate the unclamping fee,” he said.

He added that the guard later told him that he can park his bike in the basement two level of the car park. Since the guard did not inform him earlier, Mr Gan was hoping he could appeal to the condo’s management to have the unclamping fee waived and refunded.

Mr Gan had since reached out to the condo’s management a total of seven times, but has not heard back.

He even returned to the condo the next day to try speaking to the manager, but the manager did not show up even after Gan waited for several hours.

Waited the manager for 3 hours but did not show up

Fellow riders commented on Mr Gan’s post and expressed their sympathy, with some criticising the management and that it should be able to waive the fee and return the rider’s hard-earned money.

Netizen Zhi Wei questioned that why the guard insisted the rider to park under heavy rain, but at the same time, commented that Gan should have ridden into the mailbox area and if the place already quite narrow then should avoid blocking the footpath.

Mr Gan replied that he also took consideration not to blocking other vehicles which might pass through the area:

Netizen Brendan Chong opined that riders will think twice now before delivering to the condo, “and we urge riders to boycott the condo until someone comes with an apology.”

Another netizen who works in condo management suggested Mr Gan to talk to the management and appeal for the waiver of the clamping fee.

Mr Gan explained that he did go to management office and request for claim back his money, but the management said he needs to wait for their manager. He shared that he even wait there for 3 hours but the manager did not show up.

“The boss(manager) just keep play my time said coming back soon when reach the boss go out ald~then wait 3 hrs the boss also not come, ” Mr Gan commented.

One of the riders, Rusydi commented the amount of clamping fee could equivalent to 45 delivery order:

 

 

Related Topics:
Continue Reading
27 Comments
Subscribe
Notify of
27 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Community

Singapore performer impersonating Sivaji Ganesan dies after collapse during live show

Asokan S/O Muniyandy, a Singaporean performer famed for his impersonation of Indian actor Sivaji Ganesan, passed away on 12 October at the age of 60. Dubbed the “Singapore Sivaji,” he collapsed after a performance. His final rites will take place on 15 October at 5 pm.

Published

2 days ago

on

16 October 2024

By

SINGAPORE: Singaporean performer Asokan S/O Muniyandy, renowned for his impersonation of Tamil cinema legend Sivaji Ganesan, passed away on Saturday (12 Oct) at the age of 60.

Known as “Singapore Sivaji” for his uncanny resemblance to the iconic actor, Asokan was a regular performer at cultural events in Singapore and Malaysia.

He reportedly collapsed and died at the end of a live performance, leaving the audience in shock.

Videos circulating on social media show Asokan dancing moments before he suddenly collapsed face-first as the emcee spoke to the crowd.

The sudden incident left onlookers stunned.

Seithi Mediacorp reported that Asokan’s final rites will take place on Tuesday (15 Oct) at 5 p.m.

Continue Reading

Animals

Controversy erupts as NParks sets traps for wild chickens following resident complaints

A video showing NParks contractors trapping wild chickens in Yio Chu Kang has sparked online controversy. Many netizens criticize the agency for targeting harmless chickens while ignoring more disruptive animals. They argue that chickens contribute to the local charm and should be preserved instead of culled, raising questions about the complaints received.

Published

4 days ago

on

14 October 2024

By

SINGAPORE: A video showing contractors hired by the National Parks Board (NParks) laying chicken traps has ignited controversy online.

The incident occurred in the Cactus estate, located in Yio Chu Kang.

The video, first uploaded on 9 October to the Facebook group Singapore Wildlife Sightings, shows two men in green vests kneeling on a grass patch and setting up what appeared to be traps for wild chickens.

According to the original post, the contractors were responding to complaints from local residents.

In response to media inquiries from MS News, Mr How Choon Beng, NParks’ Group Director of Wildlife Management, confirmed that both NParks and the Cheng San Grassroots Organisation had received numerous complaints about free-ranging chickens in the Cactus and Sunrise estates over the past year.

The complaints cited issues related to disturbances caused by the chickens, referred to as “dis-amenities.”

Mr How explained that NParks is currently conducting “population management measures” to address the growing number of chickens in the area.

He emphasized that NParks adopts a science- and community-based approach to managing animal populations, including free-ranging chickens.

These efforts include studying the birds’ population ecology, conducting biosurveillance programs, and implementing a variety of management strategies such as public education and habitat modification.

Mr How noted, “There is no one-size-fits-all management approach when it comes to addressing the multi-faceted issues related to free-ranging chickens.”

In addition, NParks collaborates with Grassroots Organisations to promote best practices in population control and engages residents by sharing tips on managing disturbances caused by the chickens, including the removal of eggs.

NParks also reminded the public to avoid feeding the chickens, as this contributes to their overpopulation and exacerbates the problem.

Netizens criticize NParks for trapping and culling wild chickens

Under an MS News Facebook post, many netizens expressed their opposition to the trapping and culling of wild chickens, arguing that they are harmless creatures.

Some users commented that they enjoy the presence of chickens, as they contribute to a “kampong” atmosphere in the neighbourhood.

One user mentioned that it is always nice to see chickens roaming around, helping to create that nostalgic vibe of home.

Another user shared their fondness for the sight of chickens, stating it feels reminiscent of the kampong days.

They suggested that instead of targeting chickens, NParks should focus on managing more disruptive animals like pigeons and otters, which can be a nuisance.

Several commenters questioned why NParks would catch harmless chickens while allowing other animals that pose more significant issues, like otters and pigeons, to remain unchecked.

One user criticized NParks for wasting time on chickens, emphasizing that they do not pose any threat to the public, unlike otters or wild boars that have attacked people.

Another commenter pointed out that chickens play a role in controlling harmful insects and pests, while otters contribute to the removal of pet fish in local ponds.

Others urged NParks to prioritize addressing the pressing issues posed by crows and pigeons rather than focusing on roaming chickens.

Many argued that NParks should aim to preserve nature by leaving harmless chickens alone and managing genuine pests instead.

A frustrated user criticized the authorities for succumbing to complaints rather than making decisions based on what is right.

They recalled a personal experience at Alexandra Village hawker centre, where they admired a group of wild chickens with a Malaysian worker, only to learn that authorities planned to cull them due to complaints.

One user questioned the nature of these complaints, urging NParks to clarify what is so problematic about having chickens in the neighbourhood.

They argued that these animals are harmless, self-sufficient, and do not bother humans.

As urban development continues to encroach on their natural habitats, many believe it is unjust to deny them the right to coexist with people in their own neighbourhoods.

Continue Reading

Trending