Connect with us

Uncategorized

The fallout from AIM – in the people’s interest?

Published

on

By Howard Lee

An absolute mess that benefits no citizen – in seven words, that is how I would characterise and summarise the entire AIM saga, following the expose, investigation, report by the Ministry of National Development, and the latest round of Parliamentary debate.

At the base of it all is the key question of whether the MND, the People’s Action Party and the Workers’ Party have ever considered the interest of citizens in the way town councils are run and the entire way in which their tenders are administered.

Despite all the hot air from all parties about how they have served the best interest of residents, I personally see no way of how this can be the case.

For a start, the PAP-AIM issue and the WP-FMSS issue were founded on different circumstances and challenges. Hence, it is of annoying concern that our Members of Parliament would choose to squabble over who is more culpable of conflict of interest.

Indeed, the fact that both tenders were awarded to parties that have relationships with the political parties that the MPs involved belong to is a clear indicator that both the PAP and WP should be just as culpable – it is only a matter of how you define conflict of interest. Splitting hairs is not going to remove the elephant in the room, even if it is the Minister of National Development himself splitting the hairs.

More annoying, however, is that some of our most senior Parliamentarians, including a full Minister, would choose to waste precious time in Parliament, the highest institution of the State, in this tit-for-tat exchange. This is as politicised as a body of public service can get, and the error lies with both PAP and WP. Parliament is for serious discussion of national issues, not about which political party first played favourites with their associated companies.

Meanwhile, a serious issue of national concern managed to slip by: The key tenets of the MND review. Should companies owned by political parties be allowed to bid for contracts awarded by members of the same political party? Should there be higher standards in how town councils are run? Is it now time to centralise the management, or at least the governance, of town councils?

I am not for excessively regulation, and we do need to acknowledge that there are companies out that that can benefit from the service contracts that town councils implement. But it has clearly come to a point where the rather open nature of how town councils are allowed to call and award tenders have been taken unfair advantage of, and this can only be of detriment to citizens, who are after all paying for the services and have a stake in how their estates are run.

The case of AIM was a clear example. How it is possible that the contract for the upkeep of what was described as an outdated IT system can be awarded without a clear line of progress on how AIM plans to implement a replacement as soon as possible, remains a nagging point that I find impossible to understand. In the years between AIM taking over and the new system kicking in (mind, the new tender has just been awarded and it will take some time to develop and test the new system), are citizens not exposed to this decrepit system that is used to run their estates?

In addition, the entire saga has uncovered what seems to be a prevalent practice – at least what we now know of for PAP and WP wards – of MPs seeing no issues with potential conflicts of interests, even if the loose rules of the town council play book allows them that much leeway.

We see a potential for town councils to become an MP’s own fiefdom, and the current painful lacks in the governance of town councils only aggravate this risk, no matter that some Nominated MP might choose to couch it as a means for estates to establish their own unique character. These lacks have allowed MPs and their political parties to manage contracts in overtly political ways. This practice must stop, and the buck needs to stop with MND, no matter what its Minister says.

If MND does plan for an honest review of town councils, the more pressing issue should be about the governance principles behind town councils, particularly how they call tenders and award contracts. The MND investigation has effectively absolved the PAP and AIM of any wrong doing, but there is clearly a significant lack in how the AIM contract was managed. This now needs to be better refined, and a revised process made transparent and given time to be scrutinised by citizens.

We might not care about the political undertones of the entire AIM saga, and this side of the debate has clearly been played up by traditional media’s continuing coverage of the bickering over agent rates. But it is more important that town councils remain a body of public interest, dedicated to serving the needs of citizens, rather than be managed like a private entity with apparently no consideration for how citizens can actively contribute as stakeholders, beyond voting in their MPs every five years or so.

Continue Reading

Indonesia

Miss Universe cuts ties with Indonesia chapter after harassment allegations

The Miss Universe Organization severs ties with Indonesia franchise due to harassment claims. Malaysia edition canceled.

Women allege body checks before pageant. Investigation launched. Safety prioritized.

Indonesia winner to compete in November finale. Height requirement controversy.

Published

on

WASHINGTON, UNITED STATES — The Miss Universe Organization has cut ties with its Indonesia franchise, it announced days after allegations of sexual harassment, and will cancel an upcoming Malaysia edition.

In the complaint, more than a half dozen women said all 30 finalists for Miss Universe Indonesia were unexpectedly asked to strip for a supposed body check for scars and cellulite two days before the pageant’s crowning ceremony in Jakarta.

Their lawyer said Tuesday that five of the women had their pictures taken.

“In light of what we have learned took place at Miss Universe Indonesia, it has become clear that this franchise has not lived up to our brand standards, ethics, or expectations,” the US-based Miss Universe Organization posted Saturday night on social media site X, formerly known as Twitter.

It said that it had “decided to terminate the relationship with its current franchise in Indonesia, PT Capella Swastika Karya, and its National Director, Poppy Capella.”

It thanked the contestants for their bravery in coming forward and added that “providing a safe place for women” was the organization’s priority.

Jakarta police spokesman Trunoyudo Wisnu Andiko said Tuesday that an investigation into the women’s complaint has been launched.

The Indonesia franchise also holds the license for Miss Universe Malaysia, where there will no longer be a competition this year, according to the New York-based parent organizer.

In a lengthy statement posted to Instagram, Indonesia franchise director Capella denied involvement in any body checks.

“I, as the National Director and as the owner of the Miss Universe Indonesia license, was not involved at all and have never known, ordered, requested or allowed anyone who played a role and participated in the process of organizing Miss Universe Indonesia 2023 to commit violence or sexual harassment through body checking,” she wrote.

She added that she is against “any form of violence or sexual harassment.”

The Jakarta competition was held from 29 July to 3 August to choose Indonesia’s representative to the 2023 Miss Universe contest, and was won by Fabienne Nicole Groeneveld.

Miss Universe said it would make arrangements for her to compete in the finale, scheduled for November in El Salvador.

This year’s Indonesia pageant also came under fire for announcing a “significant change in this (year’s) competition guidelines” with the elimination of its minimum height requirement after it had crowned a winner.

In its statement, the Miss Universe Organization said it wanted to “make it extremely clear that there are no measurements such as height, weight, or body dimensions required to join a Miss Universe pageant worldwide.”

— AFP

Continue Reading

Malaysia

A Perodua service centre in Kuantan, Malaysia went viral for its strict dress code, Perodua responds

A dress code for vehicle servicing? A Malaysian car brand’s service centre dress code signage has puzzled netizens, raising queries about the need for attire rules during a routine service.

The manufacturer responded with an official statement after a flurry of comments, seeking to clarify and apologize.

Published

on

By

MALAYSIA: A dress code signage positioned at a service centre belonging to a prominent Malaysian car brand has sparked bewilderment among Malaysian netizens, who question the necessity of adhering to attire guidelines for a simple vehicle servicing.

The signage explicitly delineates clothing items that are deemed unsuitable, including sleeveless tops, short skirts, abbreviated pants, and distressed jeans.

The car manufacturer swiftly found itself flooded with comments from both inquisitive and irked Malaysian netizens. This surge in online activity prompted the company to issue an official statement aimed at clarifying the situation and extending an apology.

In a post that gained significant traction on the social media platform, politician Quek Tai Seong of Pahang State, Malaysia, shared an image to Facebook on Monday (7 Aug).

The image showcased a dress code sign prominently displayed at a Perodua Service Centre in Kuantan. Within the post, Quek posed the question: “Is this dress code applicable nationwide, or is it specific to this branch?”

The signage reads, “All customers dealing with Perodua Service Kuantan 1, Semambu, are requested to dress modestly and appropriately.”

Adding visual clarity to these guidelines, the sign features illustrative graphics that explicitly outline clothing items deemed unacceptable, including sleeveless tops, short skirts, short pants, and ripped jeans.

Delineating the specifics of the dress code, the signage stipulates that male visitors are expected to don shirts accompanied by neckties, opt for long pants, and wear closed shoes.

Conversely, female visitors are advised to don long-sleeved shirts, full-length skirts, and closed-toe footwear.

Perodua’s dress code sparks online uproar

Following the rapid spread of the post, Perodua’s official Facebook page found itself inundated with comments from both intrigued and frustrated Malaysian netizens, all seeking clarifications about the newly surfaced dress code policy.

Amidst the flurry of comments, numerous incensed netizens posed pointed questions such as, “What is the rationale behind the introduction of such regulations by the management? We demand an explanation.”

Another netizen expressed their dissatisfaction, arguing against the necessity of the rule and urging Perodua to take inspiration from the practices of other 4S (Sales, Service, Spare Parts, and Survey) automotive dealerships.

A concerned Facebook user chimed in, advocating for a more lenient stance, asserting that attempting to dictate customers’ clothing choices might not be in the company’s best interest.

Someone also commented in an angry tone, “Oi what is this? Going there for car service, not interview or working, right.”

As the discourse unfolded, it became evident that while some inquiries carried genuine weight, others chose to inject humor into the situation, playfully remarking, “If I wanted to buy a Myvi, I should buy or rent a formal attire first.”

“I sell economy rice at a hawker centre, I have never worn a long sleeve shirt and a tie… I guess I will not buy a Perodua car then.”

“I guess they will not serve those who wear short pants.”

Perodua addresses dress code controversy

As reported by Chinese media outlet Sin Chew Daily News, the manager of Kuantan’s Perodua Service Centre had acknowledged that the images on the dress code signage were misleading.

In response, the manager divulged that discussions had transpired with the head office, leading to the prompt removal of the signage to prevent any further misconceptions.

The manager clarifies, “We do encourage visitors to adhere to the dress etiquette, but we won’t go to the extent of restricting their choice of attire.”

He also revealed that currently, no complaints have been directly received from the public.

However, feedback from certain customers was relayed through Perodua’s agents.

Perodua also released an official statement by chief operating officer JK Rozman Jaffar on Wednesday (9 Aug) regarding the dress code on their official Facebook page.

The statement stated the dress code etiquette is not aligned with their official guidelines and they are currently conducting an official investigation on the matter followed by corrective measures to avoid the same incident from happening.

Perodua also extends its apologies for any inconvenience caused.

 

Continue Reading

Trending