Connect with us

Current Affairs

《亚洲周刊》刊专题 质问何时恢复陈六使公民权

Published

on

1963年9月23日,东南亚第一所华文大学南洋大学的创校人陈六使,被指控“与共产党份子合作”,被剥夺公民权。直到1972年老人家离逝,都未能获平反。

今年第48期(2020/11/30-12/6)的《亚洲周刊》刊载封面专题–《南洋大学等待平反   创办人陈六使公民权何时恢复?》,重访当年轰轰烈烈的教育抗争路,亦无疑向当今新加坡执政领袖抛出问题,如何重新看待南大课题。

2019年10月,南洋理工大学把校园内原名南洋谷的道路,易名“陈六使径”,肯定陈六使对教育的贡献。时任教育部长王乙康还主持揭牌仪式。“陈六使径”的设立也引发联想,许多校友和东南亚华人,都希望南大和陈六使获得平反。

“然而官方对此举完全不谈陈六使名誉是否恢复的问题,还有一些人议论的是,以陈六使对南大与华社的贡献之巨与气魄之大,路名却仅仅是一个微不足道的‘Walk’,既不匹配也显得小器。”

1953年,陈六使倡议创办以华文为主的大学,并率先捐出五百万新元。登高一呼,立马获得华人社会响应,“新马各界泉涌而来的捐献,涓滴成河海,尤其是新加坡本地,除了商家,无数市井小民、三轮车夫、舞女、小贩、洗衣妇,都为了一所完全属于民间的华文大学,默默献出自己的劳力和血汗,换成微不足道的捐款。”

《亚洲周刊》的文章提及,后来陈六使与英殖民者及已故李光耀的矛盾被政治化、甚至被视为眼中钉,结果被扣上“曾经积极与反国家共党分子合作”、对“南大在治安上成为马来亚之严重问题应负其责”为由,剥夺了陈六使的公民权。

南洋大学在一1956年正式开课,到1980年举行第21届毕业典礼为止,共培养毕业生约1万2千人,校友包括新加坡执政党政治人物蔡崇语、何家良、庄日坤、柯新治、陈原生、流亡政治人物谢太宝、何元泰、邓亮洪、反对派政治人物刘程强、艺术家陈瑞献、著名作家尤今、资深媒体人林任君、杜南发、潘正镭、澳洲历史学者杨进发、大马前内阁部长刘贤镇、企业家与社团领袖林源德、颜清文、历史学者李业霖、资深媒体人谢诗坚、评论人李万千、香港学者郑赤琰、财经专家曾渊沧、印尼出生的学者廖建裕等,都是南大校友。南大毕业生不像以英文为主流的新加坡大学毕业生,容易进入公务员体系或与官方相关的大企业,很多人在私人企业界闯荡或出洋深造,不少人成就斐然。

当年办校盛况今竟不复记忆

1958年3月30日南大落成典礼更是空前盛况,“前往校园的一条裕廊路塞车长达16公里,出席主宾总督顾德爵士,都为此迟到两个多小时”。

然而文章也感叹,短短两代人对当年那个缔造离逝的盛况,竟然不复记忆,甚至不愿提起。

其中一个原因,是李光耀在世前后的执政者,都不愿去面对它,在野党领袖也不敢、不便或不屑去提起它。李光耀在回忆录里试图隐晦自己在南大关闭事件中的角色,将倡导关闭南大的责任,归属于南大毕业的几名内阁成员。

据《联合早报》报导,去年10月时任贸工部兼教育部高级政务部长徐芳达出席南大校友之夜,曾表示“肯定南大精神”,但对于与陈六使的分歧,政府“至今仍维持当年的观点”,他也形容当年为亲共和非共阵营,为新加坡生存的博弈,最终由非共一方取得人民委托。

要知道,徐芳达曾担任李光耀私人秘书。但李光耀在《我一生的挑战 — 新加坡双语之路》,开篇就提“南大注定要失败”论。不知现今的徐芳达还坚持这观点?再者何以陈六使在教育理念上的分歧,却招致对付?以及当年众多学生被逮捕和打压?

不提南大或与政治气压有关

这篇专题也采访一些南大校友,忆述和回首往昔南大情怀;当年出国深造不易,南大就成了新马华社培育人才的根基地。然而文章探讨南大毕业生不愿提起南大的原因,可能和长期以来的政治气压有关,以及逐渐接受一种比较接近官方立场的论述,即独立后的国家必须制定国民教育政策。

不过也有者认为,“政治敏感应该随着李光耀等当事人的逝去而终结,南大事件应该放在新加坡国家历史之中去评析其是非,梳理其真相,而不能让少数人的恩怨情感,湮灭一段宝贵的历史大事,才更能健全国家的历史,凝聚国族的共识。”

完整文章欢迎阅读:《南洋大學等待平反創辦人陳六使公民權何時恢復?》 (林友順、王建安)

Continue Reading
Click to comment
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Current Affairs

Ng Eng Hen: Dust clouds likely caused armoured vehicle collision during Exercise Wallaby

Dust clouds limiting visibility likely contributed to the collision between two Hunter vehicles during Exercise Wallaby, Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen explained in his parliamentary reply. 12 servicemen sustained mild injuries, but safety measures prevented more serious outcomes. A formal investigation is ongoing to ensure further safety improvements.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Low visibility caused by dust clouds was identified as the likely cause of the collision between two Hunter armoured fighting vehicles (AFVs) during Exercise Wallaby last month, Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen said in a written parliamentary response on Tuesday (15 October).

The incident, which occurred in Queensland, Australia, on 24 September 2024, resulted in mild injuries to 12 servicemen.

Dr Ng’s statement was in response to a parliamentary question from Mr Dennis Tan, Workers’ Party Member of Parliament for Hougang SMC.

Mr Tan asked for details on the accident, specifically its cause and whether any lessons could be applied to enhance training and operational safety within the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF).

The collision took place during a night-time movement of Hunter AFVs at the Shoalwater Bay Training Area.

The vehicles were returning to base when one rear-ended another. Dr Ng explained that the dust clouds generated by the AFVs’ movement significantly impaired visibility, might likely contributing to the accident.

The 12 affected servicemen sustained mild injuries and were promptly taken to the nearest medical facility.

None of the injuries required hospitalisation, and all 12 servicemen were able to rejoin their units for training the next day.

According to the minister, adherence to safety protocols—such as wearing seat belts and protective gear—played a crucial role in limiting the injuries to mild ones.

Following the incident, a safety pause was immediately implemented, with all drivers being reminded to maintain proper safety distances, especially when visibility was compromised.

Troops were also reminded to adhere strictly to safety protocols, including the proper use of safety equipment, Dr Ng added.

The safety lessons from the incident were shared not only with the affected units but also with other participating groups in the exercise, as well as units back in Singapore, through dedicated safety briefings.

Mr Tan also asked about the broader implications of the incident. In his response, Dr Ng said that a formal investigation had been launched in accordance with SAF’s safety incident protocol.

The investigation aims to assess the circumstances more thoroughly and identify any further measures that could be taken to enhance safety.

Dr Ng shared that recommendations arising from the investigation will be implemented where necessary.

Exercise Wallaby is SAF’s largest unilateral overseas exercise, and the 2024 edition began on 8 September, running until 3 November.

The exercise involves approximately 6,200 personnel, including 500 operationally ready national servicemen.

The exercise has been conducted at Shoalwater Bay Training Area in Queensland since 1990, and it is a key part of SAF’s overseas training program.

The Hunter AFV, one of the vehicles involved in the collision, is a state-of-the-art platform jointly developed by the Defence Science and Technology Agency, the Singapore Army, and ST Engineering.

It replaced the SAF’s aging fleet of Ultra M113 AFVs in 2019, which had been in service since the 1970s. The Hunter is equipped with advanced features, including a 30mm cannon, a 76mm smoke grenade launcher, and an automatic target detection and

tracking system designed to enhance operational effectiveness. It is also capable of traveling at increased speeds and covering longer distances, making it a versatile asset for the SAF.

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

Government to “carefully consider” Lee Hsien Yang’s demolition application for 38 Oxley Road

The Singapore Government will “carefully consider” Mr Lee Hsien Yang (LHY)’s application to demolish the house at 38 Oxley Road. LHY announced his intent on Tuesday morning following the recent death of his sister, Dr Lee Wei Ling, reaffirming his commitment to honour his parents’ wish for the house’s demolition.

Published

on

The Singapore Government has indicated that it will “carefully consider” Mr Lee Hsien Yang’s (LHY) application to demolish the family home at 38 Oxley Road.

LHY, the youngest son of Singapore’s founding Prime Minister, the late Lee Kuan Yew (LKY), announced his intention to apply for the demolition in a Facebook post on 15 October 2024, following the death of his sister, Dr Lee Wei Ling, on 9 October.

The announcement marks a significant development in the ongoing saga over the fate of the historically significant property, which has been at the heart of a family dispute since LKY’s passing in 2015.

In his will, executed in December 2013, LKY expressed his desire for the house to be demolished “immediately after” Dr Lee moved out of the property. Dr Lee, a prominent neurologist, had been the last remaining resident of the house.

LHY reaffirmed his commitment to carrying out his father’s wishes, stating, “After my sister’s passing, I am the only living executor of my father’s estate. It is my duty to carry out his wishes to the fullest extent of the law.”

He added that he would seek to build a small private dwelling on the site, which would be “held within the family in perpetuity”.

LHY also referenced his brother, Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (LHL) remarks in Parliament in 2015, when he was Prime Minister, stating that upon Dr Lee’s passing, the decision to demolish the house would rest with the “Government of the day.”

In response to media queries regarding LHY’s announcement, a spokesperson for the Ministry of National Development (MND) acknowledged the intended application and emphasised that the Government would “carefully consider issues related to the property in due course”.

The spokesperson also highlighted that any decision would need to balance LKY’s wishes, public interest, and the historical value of the house.

The house at 38 Oxley Road, where key decisions about Singapore’s path to independence were made, has been a focal point of public and political discussion.

The future of the house became contentious in 2017 when LHY and Dr Lee publicly accused their elder brother, LHL, of trying to preserve the house against their father’s wishes for political reasons.

LHL denied the accusations, issuing a Ministerial Statement in Parliament, where he also raised concerns over the preparation of their father’s final will. He clarified that he had recused himself from all decisions regarding the property and affirmed that any government action would be impartial.

In 2018, a “secret” ministerial committee, which was formed in 2016 to study the future of 38 Oxley Road, proposed three options: preserving the property and designating it as a national monument, partially demolishing the house while retaining the historically significant basement dining room, or allowing complete demolition for redevelopment. LHL accepted the committee’s conclusions but stated that no immediate decision was necessary, as Dr Lee was still living in the house.

In a statement conveyed by LHY on behalf of Dr Lee after her passing, she reiterated her strong support for her father’s wish to demolish the house. “My father, Lee Kuan Yew, and my mother, Kwa Geok Choo, had an unwavering and deeply felt wish for their house at 38 Oxley Road to be demolished upon the last parent’s death,” the statement read.

She added, “He had also appealed directly to the people of Singapore. Please honour my father by honouring his wish for his home to be demolished.”

Despite selling the house to LHY at market value in 2015, LHL’s stance regarding the house’s preservation became a public issue, especially after the family disclosed that the Government had raised concerns about reinstating the demolition clause in the 2013 will. The ministerial committee had reviewed the matter, but a final decision was deferred until now.

The fate of 38 Oxley Road remains to be seen, but the Government’s decision will likely have lasting implications for the legacy of the Lee family and the conservation of Singapore’s historical landmarks.

Continue Reading

Trending