Connect with us

International

Patience is no longer key to a successful political transition in Sudan

Amid the ongoing conflict in Sudan, there is a need for civilian rule and subsequent democracy, according to a recent opinion piece by Byamukama.

Since the 2021 coup, the country has been run by the army, and neither coup leader General Abdel Fattah Burhan nor Rapid Support Forces leader General Mohammed Hamdan Dangalo appear to have any intention of relinquishing power.

The concern is that the fighting might escalate and destabilize the entire region, spilling over into neighboring countries, such as Chad and Egypt, which are also under juntaism and limited democracy.

Published

on

by Byamukama Richard Bard

SUDAN — The developments in Sudan over the last few days are not good for the stability of the nation or its prospects for any transition to democratic rule. Such stakes of the current unrest could go beyond the immediate future of Burhan, Dangalo, and even the Sudanese nation. There is an urgent need to force civilian rule and subsequent democracy.

At least 413 people have been killed in fighting in Sudan since violence broke out on 15, according to the United Nations’ World Health Organization, most of them civilians. One United States citizen is among those who have been killed, the US State Department said on Thursday

Since the 2021 coup that ended the transitional government that replaced the long-time violent Sudanese military ruler Omar al Bashir in 2019, Sudan has been run by the army which the coup leader General Abdel Fattah Burhan as the ruler.

In the same way, General Mohammed Hamdan Dangalo, who is commonly known as ‘Hemedti’ the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) leader has worked alongside the Sudanese army to keep the military junta in power

We are talking about two men and two factions with ideological differences over the future of Sudan due to greed for power and more power. This should not be framed as left-wing or right-wing politics, nor a geo-religious conflict between the majority Muslim north against the Christians in the south. It is not radicalized violence like it was in the Darfur conflict between the self-identified Arab Janajaweed killing Black people.

Following Bashir’s ouster, the political transition was supposed to result in elections by the end of 2023, but it appears that neither Burhan nor Dangalo has any intention of relinquishing power and giving the people a break from juntaism.

The U.S. and a coalition of civilian groups in the country have called for an immediate halt to the violence but both factions dug in, and seem unlikely to give the people of Sudan their freedom. Similarly, the prospects of a free and fair election in Sudan seem way off.

The concern is that the fighting might escalate to destabilize the entire region or even spill over to the neighbouring countries of Chad, and Egypt, which are also under juntaism and limited democracy.

Ethiopia, Sudan’s neighbour in the East, is still reeling from a two-year war in the Tigray region, and the spread of unrest in Sudan should be a concern to those anticipating an easy peace and unbreakable peace deal in South Sudan, which gained independence from Sudan in 2011 and has been in ethnic politics and ethnic war ever since

The Sudanese people have vast experience in toppling military dictators through popular uprisings. Patience is no longer key to a successful political transition. Sudanese politics should break with the historical pattern of musical chairs and be able to overcome traditional political and economic exploitation of regions outside the cities by turning to more accountable civilian governance and democracy.


Byamukama Richard Bard is a lawyer and a student of masters in security and strategic studies, trained from Kabalye National Police Training School and Great Lakes Institute of Security and Strategic Studies 

Continue Reading
1 Comment
Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

International

US warns Israel to increase humanitarian aid in Gaza or face possible military aid cut

The US has sent a letter to Israel, urging it to increase humanitarian aid to Gaza within 30 days or risk a reduction in US military assistance. This demand comes amid escalating civilian casualties in Gaza as Israel intensifies its offensive.

Published

on

The United States has issued a written ultimatum to Israel, urging the country to increase humanitarian aid access to Gaza or face potential cuts to military assistance.

The letter, sent on Sunday, marks the strongest known warning from the US to Israel on this issue, as humanitarian conditions in Gaza continue to deteriorate amid ongoing military operations. The communication, confirmed by the US State Department, was signed by Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin.

The letter highlights Washington’s concerns over the rising civilian casualties and the humanitarian blockade in Gaza.

It notes that Israel impeded nearly 90% of humanitarian movements between the northern and southern regions of Gaza last month. These actions, it asserts, are contributing to worsening conditions for the Palestinian population.

Israel’s northern offensive, targeting Hamas militants, has reportedly caused significant civilian harm, drawing international scrutiny.

The letter demands immediate actions from Israel to allow humanitarian aid, stressing that failure to comply could impact future US military assistance. According to US law, military aid can be cut off if a recipient country impedes the delivery of US humanitarian aid.

The US is the largest supplier of arms to Israel, which has relied on US-supplied military equipment during its recent operations in Gaza.

However, Washington is now calling for a rapid increase in humanitarian assistance, particularly ahead of the winter season. The letter outlines concrete steps that Israel must take, including allowing the entry of at least 350 aid trucks per day through multiple border crossings and ending the isolation of northern Gaza.

Secretary Blinken and Defence Secretary Austin expressed deep concern over the “accelerated deterioration” of living conditions for Palestinians, especially the 1.7 million people forced into the overcrowded al-Mawasi area. These displaced individuals are facing the risk of lethal disease outbreaks due to the dire living conditions.

On Tuesday, State Department spokesman Matthew Miller confirmed that the letter was a private diplomatic communication, though he did not speculate on what specific consequences Israel might face if it does not comply.

He emphasised that US law prohibits military assistance to countries obstructing humanitarian aid, but expressed optimism that Israel would address the concerns raised.

In response to criticisms about the timing of the ultimatum, Miller clarified that the 30-day period was unrelated to the upcoming US presidential election in November. Instead, he said it was an appropriate timeframe for Israel to address the issues involved.

For its part, Israel maintains that it is not obstructing humanitarian aid, insisting that the United Nations and other humanitarian organisations are responsible for the distribution of supplies. The Israeli military also accuses Hamas of diverting aid for its own purposes, which Hamas has consistently denied.

Despite these claims, the UN has reported severe shortages in Gaza, particularly in the northern regions.

The two-week pause in aid deliveries to northern Gaza ended on Monday when the Israeli military allowed 30 trucks of aid from the World Food Programme to enter through the Erez crossing. The United Nations had previously warned that food and essential supplies were running out for the 400,000 Palestinians still living in the north.

The Israeli military, while acknowledging the US concerns, has continued its ground operations, particularly in Jabalia, a town in northern Gaza.

This latest offensive has caused heavy civilian casualties, with Gaza’s Hamas-run Civil Defence agency reporting that 42 bodies were recovered from air and artillery strikes on Tuesday. The victims reportedly included 11 members of the same family.

The offensive in Jabalia is part of Israel’s broader campaign to root out Hamas fighters, which was launched after the group’s 7 October 2023 attack on southern Israel.

That assault left 1,200 Israelis dead and over 250 others taken hostage, prompting Israel to initiate a military response aimed at destroying Hamas’ infrastructure in Gaza.

As part of the current ground campaign, Israeli forces have ordered evacuations from several northern Gaza areas, including Jabalia and Beit Lahia, pushing residents toward the al-Mawasi region.

However, local reports suggest that many civilians are unable or unwilling to leave due to the ongoing fighting, sickness, or physical incapacity.

Israeli human rights groups have warned of a possible “forced transfer” of civilians, citing the controversial Generals’ Plan, which aims to evacuate the northern population entirely. Israeli authorities deny this, claiming that evacuation orders are only intended to keep civilians safe.

The humanitarian crisis in Gaza has drawn widespread international concern. The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) reported on Tuesday that families in northern Gaza are facing “unimaginable fear, loss of loved ones, confusion, and exhaustion.” The organisation stressed the urgency of addressing the humanitarian needs in the region as the Israeli military continues its operations.

Amidst these developments, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the largest Muslim civil rights group in the US, has called for the resignation of Secretary of State Antony Blinken. CAIR’s demand follows reports that Blinken allegedly misled Congress earlier this year by denying that Israel was blocking humanitarian aid to Gaza.

According to an investigation by ProPublica, Blinken told Congress in May that “we do not currently assess that the Israeli government is prohibiting or otherwise restricting the transport or delivery of US humanitarian assistance.”

However, ProPublica reports that two US government authorities—the US Agency for International Development (USAID) and the State Department’s refugee bureau—had concluded that Israel was deliberately blocking the delivery of food and medicine to Gaza.

These findings were reportedly shared with senior diplomats in late April, weeks before Blinken’s statement to Congress. CAIR has accused Blinken of lying to lawmakers and has called for his resignation due to what it sees as a serious breach of trust and accountability.

Continue Reading

International

Israeli tanks breach UNIFIL base amid calls for peacekeeper evacuation

Israeli tanks breached a UN peacekeeping base in southern Lebanon on 13 October, sparking condemnation from Israel’s allies. Prime Minister Netanyahu called for UNIFIL’s withdrawal from combat zones, accusing it of shielding Hezbollah militants. UNIFIL reported increasing attacks, leading to concerns about the force’s safety and regional stability.

Published

on

(file image)

Israeli tanks breached a United Nations peacekeeping base in southern Lebanon on 13 October, prompting condemnation and escalating tensions between Israel and its allies. The incident marks the latest in a series of reported violations involving Israel and the UN Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL).

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu urged the United Nations to evacuate the peacekeepers from combat zones, particularly areas under Hezbollah’s control.

In a statement to UN Secretary General António Guterres, Netanyahu claimed the peacekeepers’ presence provided cover for Hezbollah, the Iran-backed militant group, by acting as “human shields.”

Netanyahu’s appeal followed several alleged attacks on peacekeepers in recent days.

UNIFIL confirmed the tank incursion at one of its bases, describing it as part of a pattern of Israeli violations, including the wounding of five peacekeepers.

Italy, one of the largest contributors to UNIFIL, has also expressed deep concern. Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni condemned the attacks during a phone call with Netanyahu. She reiterated the unacceptability of Israeli strikes targeting UN peacekeepers, reflecting growing unease among Western allies.

UNIFIL OPERATIONS UNDER THREAT

UNIFIL, established in 1978 to monitor peace in southern Lebanon, has frequently been caught in the middle of Israeli-Hezbollah conflict.

Following Israel’s 2006 war with Hezbollah, UN Security Council Resolution 1701 mandated that the region remain free of unauthorised military forces. However, Israel has accused UNIFIL of failing to prevent Hezbollah from stockpiling weapons and operating in the area.

Over the past weeks, hostilities between Israel and Hezbollah have intensified. UNIFIL reported attacks on peacekeeping equipment, such as watchtowers and surveillance systems, compromising their ability to monitor the area. Peacekeeping operations have been nearly suspended since late September, with over 300 peacekeepers temporarily relocated to larger bases for safety.

The escalating violence has also raised alarms in other nations contributing to UNIFIL.

In addition to Italy, France and Spain—both of which have significant contingents in the force—have issued statements condemning Israeli actions against peacekeepers.

Israeli Foreign Minister Israel Katz responded by reiterating Israel’s dissatisfaction with the UN, particularly its perceived failure to condemn Iran’s missile attacks in early October.

Late on Sunday, UN spokesperson Stéphane Dujarric said: “Unifil peacekeepers remain in all positions and the UN flag continues to fly.

“The secretary-general reiterates that Unifil personnel and its premises must never be targeted. Attacks against peacekeepers are in breach of international law, including international humanitarian law. They may constitute a war crime,” he said.

US urges restraint, heightened tensions in region

US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin expressed concern over the attacks on peacekeeper positions in a call with Israeli Defence Minister Yoav Gallant.

Austin stressed the need for Israel to ensure the safety of UNIFIL personnel, as well as that of the Lebanese military, which is not directly involved in the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hezbollah.

Tensions in the region remain high following the 7 October 2023 Hamas attack on Israel. Hezbollah’s involvement has further complicated the situation, with fears that Israeli military actions could provoke a larger regional conflict involving Iran.

The latest reports suggest Israel may retaliate against Iran for an earlier missile attack on 1 October. Iran’s Foreign Minister, Abbas Araqchi, declared that Iran has “no red lines” in its defence, heightening the risk of further escalation.

Lebanon’s government reported over 2,100 deaths and 10,000 injuries resulting from the conflict over the past year, with significant casualties occurring in recent weeks.

While the Lebanese death toll does not distinguish between civilians and combatants, it includes numerous women and children, highlighting the human cost of the ongoing violence.

Calls for peace amid fears of wider conflict

The possibility of a broader war looms large, with neighbouring Iraq also expressing concern. Iraqi Foreign Minister Fuad Hussein, speaking alongside Araqchi, warned of the dangers an all-out war could pose to global energy markets.

“We call on all influential and concerned countries to work to stop the war and start a ceasefire in Gaza and Lebanon,” Hussein said, underscoring the geopolitical risks involved.

As of now, the fate of UNIFIL remains uncertain. Despite Israel’s calls for their evacuation, UN peacekeeping chief Jean-Pierre Lacroix insisted that the force would continue its mission.

Lacroix acknowledged, however, that the safety of peacekeepers had become “increasingly jeopardised,” with their ability to monitor violations severely restricted.

UNIFIL has been a key stabilising factor in southern Lebanon for decades, but with Israeli-Hezbollah hostilities worsening, its continued presence in the region could lead to further conflicts involving international forces.

The United Nations is facing increasing pressure to either reinforce or reassess its peacekeeping mission in one of the Middle East’s most volatile regions.

Continue Reading

Trending