Connect with us

Myanmar

OHCHR report highlights $1 Billion USD arms trade operating in UN member states, including Singapore, despite embargo

UN Special Rapporteur, Tom Andrews, reveals an ongoing billion-dollar arms trade to Myanmar’s military, implicating entities in UN member states, including Singapore. Despite claims of strict arms transfer regulations, Singapore is highlighted for its crucial role in facilitating these transactions, contrasting with Singaporean authorities’ assertions of adherence to international obligations. The conflicting narratives leave unanswered questions about Singapore’s arms embargo enforcement.

Published

on

On 17 May 2023, Tom Andrews, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Myanmar, released an extensive report that sheds light on the ongoing arms trade to Myanmar’s military, which has continued since the coup in February 2021.

The report, published by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), provides evidence that the military has imported at least $1 billion USD worth of arms and raw materials for the manufacturing of weapons.

The brutal attack on Pazigyi Village in the Sagaing Region on 11 April 2023, which resulted in the death of approximately 170 people, including 40 children, is a chilling testament to the devastating impact of unrestricted arms trade with the Myanmar military.

In his report, Andrews calls out UN Member States, including Singapore, for their role in enabling this trade through complicity, lax enforcement of bans, and the simple evasion of sanctions. He emphatically emphasizes the urgent need for Member States to act decisively and advocates for a complete prohibition on the sale or transfer of weapons to Myanmar’s military.

The report, named “The Billion Dollar Death Trade: International Arms Networks that Enable Human Rights Violations in Myanmar,” represents the most exhaustive study on post-coup arms transfers to the military.

It reveals significant networks and companies engaged in these transactions, operating out of Russia, China, Singapore, Thailand, and India.

Russia and China emerged as the chief suppliers of advanced weapon systems to Myanmar’s military, contributing over $400 million and $260 million respectively since the coup.

However, the report also shed light on the crucial role of Singapore, with entities based in the city-state instrumental to the Myanmar military’s lethal weapons factories.

According to the report, Singapore has become a major jurisdiction for the transit of spare parts, raw materials, and manufacturing equipment.

From February 2021 to December 2022, $254 million USD worth of supplies were dispatched from various Singaporean entities to the Myanmar military, often involving Singaporean banks.

Entities in Singapore are critical to the operation of Myanmar’s Directorate of Defense Industries’ weapons factories (commonly referred to as KaPaSa, the Burmese acronym for DDI).

The Special Rapporteur has received no information indicating that the Singapore Government has approved, or is involved in, the shipment of arms and associated materials to the Myanmar military.

Singapore banks have likewise been used extensively by arms traffickers operating within Singapore and outside of it, with payments for hundreds of millions of dollars of arms transfers moving through Singapore banks.

The Special Rapporteur has decided not to list the names of Singaporean entities transferring arms to the Myanmar military in order to allow time for the Singapore Government and other UN Member States to take action.

The Singapore government has previously voiced its policy to “prohibit the transfer of arms to Myanmar” and has pledged not to approve the transfer of dual-use items that could potentially have military applications in Myanmar.

Andrews contended that if Singapore were to halt all shipments and facilitation of arms and associated materials to the Myanmar military, it would significantly disrupt the junta’s capacity to commit war crimes.

The report further recorded transfers from Thai-based entities, totalling $28 million USD, and Indian-based entities supplying $51 million worth of arms and related materials to Myanmar’s military since February 2021.

Andrews underscored the need to target primary sources of foreign currency that the Myanmar junta depends on for arms purchases, including the Myanma Oil and Gas Enterprise.

He pointed out that no Member State has imposed sanctions on the Myanma Foreign Trade Bank (MFTB), a crucial institution for the junta to receive foreign currency and buy arms. Andrews called for international sanctions against MFTB, suggesting it could greatly disrupt the arms trade.

Singapore prohibit arms transfers and denies transfer of dual-use items to Myanmar

However, Singapore’s Minister for Foreign Affairs, Dr Vivian Balakrishnan, presented a contrasting viewpoint in response to questions raised by Workers’ Party Member of Parliament for Hougang SMC, Mr Dennis Tan, on 14th February 2023 about Singapore functioning as a “strategic transit point” for materials contributing to Myanmar’s military production.

Referring to a statement from former Minister for Foreign Affairs George Yeo in 2007, Dr Balakrishnan asserted that Singapore has not substantially contributed to Myanmar’s defence sales and has not been involved in any defence sales to Myanmar in recent years. He reiterated that this policy still holds, even after 16 years, countering the claims of the recent UN report.

He emphasized Singapore’s strict adherence to its international obligations concerning international arms sales and transfers, and its commitment to UN sanctions and embargoes.

He also clarified that Singapore, despite the non-binding nature of the UN General Assembly Resolution 75/287, decided to prohibit arms transfers to Myanmar and deny the transfer of dual-use items with potential military applications.

While Dr Balakrishnan’s February statements may offer some reassurance to the international community, the UN report’s findings raise questions about Singapore’s efforts to maintain the arms embargo. It remains to be seen how these contrasting perspectives will be resolved.

infographic-sr-myanmar-2023-05-17

Continue Reading
6 Comments
Subscribe
Notify of
6 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Civil Society

Forum-Asia condemns execution of Myanmar pro-democracy activists and warns of further killings by junta

FORUM-ASIA and ASEAN Parliamentarians for Human Rights (APHR) condemned Myanmar’s military junta for executing activists Maung Kaung Htet and Chan Myae Thu. They urged ASEAN ministers and the international community to act swiftly to prevent further executions, warning of human rights violations and the ongoing repression of dissent.

Published

on

Maung Kaung Htet and his wife, Chan Myae Thu

Editor’s Note (updated 26/09/2024): In a previous version of this article, we reported allegations regarding two executions in Myanmar, based on statements from ASEAN Parliamentarians for Human Rights and Forum Asia. Recent reports from The Irrawaddy suggest that these allegations may be part of a disinformation campaign by the Myanmar junta. We urge our readers to approach this information with caution.


FORUM-ASIA and ASEAN Parliamentarians for Human Rights (APHR) have strongly condemned the Myanmar military junta for the execution of pro-democracy activists Maung Kaung Htet and his wife, Chan Myae Thu, on 23 September 2024.

The couple was executed at 4:00 AM Myanmar time for their alleged involvement in the October 2022 Insein Prison bombing in Yangon. These executions are part of an escalating crackdown on dissent under the military’s rule.

Mary Aileen Diez-Bacalso, Executive Director of FORUM-ASIA, criticized the use of the death penalty as a tactic to instill fear and silence opposition, noting that the executions were carried out without due process. She called for immediate international action to hold the junta accountable for its ongoing human rights abuses.

Echoing these concerns, APHR also condemned the executions, expressing deep condolences to the families of the victims.

Mercy Chriesty Barends, Chairperson of APHR and a member of Indonesia’s House of Representatives, urged ASEAN foreign ministers to take a stronger stance. “Break the silence now. ASEAN foreign ministers must speak up against the SAC execution policy,” Barends said. She highlighted that Chan Myae Thu was the first woman executed by the junta since its February 2021 coup, according to the Women’s Peace Network.

APHR Board Member and Philippine parliamentarian Arlene D. Brosas voiced grave concerns about the death penalty being used to suppress dissent in Myanmar.

“We are gravely concerned that the death penalty is being used to silence persons with dissenting views in Myanmar,” she said, pointing to the broader implications for human rights in the country.

Both FORUM-ASIA and APHR expressed alarm over the junta’s plans to execute five more political prisoners—Kaung Pyae Sone Oo, Kyaw Win Soe, San Min Aung, Zayyar Phyo, and Myat Phyo Pwint—on 24 September 2024.

These individuals were sentenced to death in May 2023 following a closed-door civilian trial at Yangon’s Insein Prison. The five were accused of involvement in a 2021 shooting on the Yangon Circular Railway that resulted in the deaths of four police officers. APHR reported that these prisoners were subjected to brutal torture and sexual violence and denied access to legal counsel during their detention.

APHR Co-Chairperson and former Malaysian parliamentarian Charles Santiago called for immediate action. “This must stop. ASEAN foreign ministers must denounce such an unjust act. They must be united to push the SAC to terminate their execution and release them from prison,” Santiago urged.

The planned executions come amid a broader wave of repression in Myanmar. Since resuming executions in 2022 after a 40-year moratorium, the military junta has increasingly used the death penalty as a tool to suppress dissent.

That year, four pro-democracy activists were executed following convictions on terrorism charges, with their trials condemned for their lack of transparency and due process.

According to APHR, the military junta plans to execute over 120 more detainees in the coming weeks, many of whom are activists and human rights defenders.

APHR reports that 15 of those facing imminent execution are women human rights defenders. The organization highlighted the arrest and detention of more than 27,000 people since the junta seized power in February 2021, alongside allegations of war crimes, crimes against humanity, and even genocide committed by the junta.

As Myanmar’s crisis deepens, both FORUM-ASIA and APHR have called for the international community, particularly ASEAN, to step up efforts to end the impunity under which the junta operates.

Barends and Santiago emphasized that merely condemning the junta’s actions is no longer enough. There is an urgent need for concrete international measures to hold Myanmar’s State Administration Council (SAC) accountable and prevent further atrocities.

The Myanmar military has faced mounting criticism for its widespread human rights violations since the February 2021 coup, which toppled the democratically elected government.

The junta has cracked down violently on protests, arresting thousands of political opponents, activists, and civilians in what rights groups describe as a campaign of terror aimed at stifling all forms of dissent.

FORUM-ASIA and APHR’s calls for intervention focus on preventing further executions and ensuring that the international community holds the junta responsible for its human rights abuses.

Both organizations have stressed the importance of united action by ASEAN and global powers to prevent the Myanmar crisis from escalating further.

Continue Reading

Civil Society

APHR urges Myanmar’s SAC to halt imminent execution of five democracy activists

The ASEAN Parliamentarians for Human Rights (APHR) has called on Myanmar’s State Administration Council to halt the execution of five democracy activists scheduled for 24 September 2024. APHR cited grave concerns about the death sentences and called for the activists’ unconditional release.

Published

on

The ASEAN Parliamentarians for Human Rights (APHR) has called on Myanmar’s ruling State Administration Council (SAC) to immediately halt the scheduled execution of five democracy activists, set to take place on 24 September 2024.

The activists—Zaryaw Phyo (32), San Min Aung (24), Kyaw Win Soe (33), Kaung Pyae Sone Oo (27), and Myat Phyo Pwint—were sentenced to death in a closed-door hearing at Yangon’s Insein Prison on 18 May 2023.

They were convicted for their alleged involvement in a deadly shooting on a Yangon train in 2021, which resulted in the deaths of six police officers.

The attack occurred amid a national wave of armed resistance to the military coup that had taken place earlier in 2021.

The detainees were charged with murder and illegal weapons possession under several laws, including the 1949 Arms Act and the 2014 Counterterrorism Law.

According to Myanmar Now, the sentences were handed down by District Judge Khin Ni Ni Aye of Ahlone Township, where the attack took place nearly two years earlier.

The court sentenced Kaung Pyae Sone Oo to two death penalties under the Arms Act and terrorism charges, while the other defendants received one death sentence and one life sentence each.

APHR Chairperson Mercy Chriesty Barends, a member of Indonesia’s House of Representatives, condemned the verdicts, calling for the unconditional release of the detainees.

“We call upon the SAC to immediately release them and ensure that, pending their release, the detention conditions comply with international standards,” Barends said. She further stressed the importance of access to legal representation, medical care, and contact with family.

The activists’ death sentences were particularly concerning to APHR, as they were issued by the civilian judiciary, rather than a military court, marking the first such case since the military coup in 2021.

APHR Board Member Wong Chen, a Malaysian MP, called the use of the death penalty a means of stifling dissent. “The use of capital punishment as a tool to suppress dissent is unacceptable and must be condemned in the strongest terms,” he stated.

The group also drew attention to the fact that this sentencing comes at a time when more than 100 post-coup prisoners are currently on death row in Myanmar.

The Assistance Association for Political Prisoners (AAPP) reported that 117 individuals arrested following the 2021 coup await execution, and a further 42 have been sentenced to death in absentia. While the regime has commuted some sentences and pardoned political prisoners, the continued use of capital punishment signals a deepening crackdown on political opposition.

Kasit Piromya, APHR Board Member and former Thai MP, noted the broader implications of these sentences. “This marks the first instance of the civilian judiciary, rather than a military tribunal, issuing death sentences since the coup, signalling a disturbing shift in the judicial proceedings in Myanmar,” he said.

The upcoming execution has raised fears reminiscent of the August 2022 execution of four prominent anti-coup activists, including former National League for Democracy (NLD) MP Phyo Zeya Thaw, whose executions marked the first use of capital punishment in Myanmar in decades and sparked global outrage.

APHR Board Member Arlene D. Brosas, a Philippine MP, said that the SAC’s ongoing use of executions represents a “significant setback” in peace efforts.

“These executions show the absence of political will from the SAC to implement the ASEAN Five-Point Consensus meaningfully,” she added.

APHR continues to advocate for the unconditional release of all political prisoners in Myanmar and urges the international community to increase pressure on the SAC to cease its human rights violations.

Continue Reading

Trending