Connect with us

Uncategorized

Life in Singapore

Tan Kin Lian conducts online poll about life in S’pore.

Published

on

Tan Kin Lian / Columnist

How do Singaporeans feel about life in Singapore. I carried out a survey in my blog. 115 people replied.

A breakdown by age and annual income is:

Below 30

20%

31 to 50

52%

Above 50

28%

Below $50k

51%

Above $50k

49%

There is a good distribution of participants by age groups but an over-representation of participants in the higher income group.

The participants were asked to give a rating to 19 items. For each item, they have to give a score of 1 (very unhappy) to 5 (very happy). A score of 3 indicates a neutral position.

The average score for 65 participants on the 19 items was 2.83. It is slightly below neutral. The participants were, on average, slightly unhappy.

High ratings

The items that scored the highest were, in the following order:

 

Average

Safety

4.02

Law and order

3.87

Multi racial culture

3.43

Work colleagues

3.28

Environment

3.25

Neighbours

3.24

Singaporeans like our safety, law and order, multi racial culture, work colleagues, clean and green environment and neighbours.  These features fared well over the past decades. More importantly, people like the bond and identity among Singaporeans.

Low ratings

The items that scored the lowest were:

 

Average

Transport system

2.50

National service

2.35

Foreign workers

2.34

Government leaders

2.32

Tax, GST, govt charges

1.91

Cost of living

1.85

Singaporeans dislike the high cost of living and taxes, GST and the government charges (e.g. ERP). These are well known and ranked at the bottom of the scale.

They dislike foreign workers who compete for jobs here. Ranked below foreign workers is the rating of our Government leaders. This is a matter of concern. Are our Government leaders losing the respect and bonds with the citizens?

National service is also strongly disliked. This is worrisome, as national service is the foundation of our national security. Perhaps it is time to review the role of national service. Is it fair that the burden should be borne by our male citizens, who have to compete with foreign workers who come easily to work in Singapore? Perhaps, this is also the reason for the low rating given to the foreign workers.

The transport system also appears to be quite lowly rated. We used to have an world class transport system which was the pride of Singaporeans. In recent years, the rating has dropped. This is probably due to the priority given by the transport operators to increase their profits at the expense of convenience and comfort of the commuters, and the recent increase in taxi fares and ERP charges.

Income levels

Here are some significant differences in ratings between respondents at the lower and higher income levels. The dividing line is an annual income of $50,000.

 

Less than
 $50,000

More than
 $50,000

Diff

Overall rating

2.71

2.98

-0.27

Adequate wages

2.23

3.38

-1.15

Cost of living

1.53

2.22

-0.69

Taxes, GST, charges

1.65

2.22

-0.57

Quality of life

2.76

3.31

-0.55

Foreign workers

2.14

2.55

-0.41

Government leaders

2.12

2.53

-0.41

National service

2.2

2.59

-0.39

In most items, the lower income groups give a lower rating compared to the higher income groups. Life is more difficult for the lower income groups in Singapore, due to their low wages and the higher cost of living.

 

Less than
$50,000

More than
$50,000

Diff

Singaporeans

2.65

2.65

0.00

Time to enjoy

2.60

2.55

0.05

Environment

3.34

3.24

0.10

Time with family

2.98

2.85

0.13

Climate

2.96

2.69

0.27

The lower income groups gave the same or better ratings for the above factors.

Younger people

Here is a comparison between participants below 30 years and participants of all ages.

 

Below
30 years

All ages

Diff

Overall rating

2.89

2.83

0.06

Singaporeans

2.55

2.63

-0.08

Foreign workers

2.18

2.34

-0.16

Time with family

2.57

2.91

-0.34

Adequate wages

2.27

2.77

-0.50

Time to enjoy

2.00

2.57

-0.57

The overall ratings for the younger participants are quite close to the rating for all ages.  The next four ratings show significant negative differences between the younger participants and all participants.

The differences suggest that younger people are working harder, getting inadequate wages and have less time with family or to enjoy. Perhaps this accounts for their reluctance to marry and raise a family.

Older people

Here is a comparison between participants above 50 years and participants of all ages.

 

Above
50 years

All ages

Diff

Overall rating

2.89

2.83

0.06

National service

2.71

2.35

0.36

Singaporeans

2.97

2.63

0.34

Government leaders

2.55

2.32

0.23

Time to enjoy

2.80

2.57

0.23

The overall ratings for the older participants are quite close to the rating for all ages. The next four ratings show significant positive differences between the older participants and all participants.

The differences suggest that the older people are more positive towards national service, Singaporeans, government leaders and time to enjoy.

Conclusions

I am worried about the following findings from this survey:

  • Unhappiness about the tax, GST, charges and high cost of living
  • Low rating for Government leaders
  • Significant dissatisfaction rating of the lower income groups
  • Hard work and inadequate wages of the younger people.
  • Unhappiness about National Service
  • Unhappiness about the influx of foreign workers

The positive ratings are for safety, law and order, multi-racial culture, environment and the people of Singapore.

Perhaps Singapore can be a better place to live, if the cost of living can be kept lower by reducing tax and government charges, and giving better wages to younger people and the lower income workers.  We need social and economic policies that are more egalitarian and fairer to the people.

 —————

 

Continue Reading
Click to comment
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Indonesia

Miss Universe cuts ties with Indonesia chapter after harassment allegations

The Miss Universe Organization severs ties with Indonesia franchise due to harassment claims. Malaysia edition canceled.

Women allege body checks before pageant. Investigation launched. Safety prioritized.

Indonesia winner to compete in November finale. Height requirement controversy.

Published

on

WASHINGTON, UNITED STATES — The Miss Universe Organization has cut ties with its Indonesia franchise, it announced days after allegations of sexual harassment, and will cancel an upcoming Malaysia edition.

In the complaint, more than a half dozen women said all 30 finalists for Miss Universe Indonesia were unexpectedly asked to strip for a supposed body check for scars and cellulite two days before the pageant’s crowning ceremony in Jakarta.

Their lawyer said Tuesday that five of the women had their pictures taken.

“In light of what we have learned took place at Miss Universe Indonesia, it has become clear that this franchise has not lived up to our brand standards, ethics, or expectations,” the US-based Miss Universe Organization posted Saturday night on social media site X, formerly known as Twitter.

It said that it had “decided to terminate the relationship with its current franchise in Indonesia, PT Capella Swastika Karya, and its National Director, Poppy Capella.”

It thanked the contestants for their bravery in coming forward and added that “providing a safe place for women” was the organization’s priority.

Jakarta police spokesman Trunoyudo Wisnu Andiko said Tuesday that an investigation into the women’s complaint has been launched.

The Indonesia franchise also holds the license for Miss Universe Malaysia, where there will no longer be a competition this year, according to the New York-based parent organizer.

In a lengthy statement posted to Instagram, Indonesia franchise director Capella denied involvement in any body checks.

“I, as the National Director and as the owner of the Miss Universe Indonesia license, was not involved at all and have never known, ordered, requested or allowed anyone who played a role and participated in the process of organizing Miss Universe Indonesia 2023 to commit violence or sexual harassment through body checking,” she wrote.

She added that she is against “any form of violence or sexual harassment.”

The Jakarta competition was held from 29 July to 3 August to choose Indonesia’s representative to the 2023 Miss Universe contest, and was won by Fabienne Nicole Groeneveld.

Miss Universe said it would make arrangements for her to compete in the finale, scheduled for November in El Salvador.

This year’s Indonesia pageant also came under fire for announcing a “significant change in this (year’s) competition guidelines” with the elimination of its minimum height requirement after it had crowned a winner.

In its statement, the Miss Universe Organization said it wanted to “make it extremely clear that there are no measurements such as height, weight, or body dimensions required to join a Miss Universe pageant worldwide.”

— AFP

Continue Reading

Malaysia

A Perodua service centre in Kuantan, Malaysia went viral for its strict dress code, Perodua responds

A dress code for vehicle servicing? A Malaysian car brand’s service centre dress code signage has puzzled netizens, raising queries about the need for attire rules during a routine service.

The manufacturer responded with an official statement after a flurry of comments, seeking to clarify and apologize.

Published

on

By

MALAYSIA: A dress code signage positioned at a service centre belonging to a prominent Malaysian car brand has sparked bewilderment among Malaysian netizens, who question the necessity of adhering to attire guidelines for a simple vehicle servicing.

The signage explicitly delineates clothing items that are deemed unsuitable, including sleeveless tops, short skirts, abbreviated pants, and distressed jeans.

The car manufacturer swiftly found itself flooded with comments from both inquisitive and irked Malaysian netizens. This surge in online activity prompted the company to issue an official statement aimed at clarifying the situation and extending an apology.

In a post that gained significant traction on the social media platform, politician Quek Tai Seong of Pahang State, Malaysia, shared an image to Facebook on Monday (7 Aug).

The image showcased a dress code sign prominently displayed at a Perodua Service Centre in Kuantan. Within the post, Quek posed the question: “Is this dress code applicable nationwide, or is it specific to this branch?”

The signage reads, “All customers dealing with Perodua Service Kuantan 1, Semambu, are requested to dress modestly and appropriately.”

Adding visual clarity to these guidelines, the sign features illustrative graphics that explicitly outline clothing items deemed unacceptable, including sleeveless tops, short skirts, short pants, and ripped jeans.

Delineating the specifics of the dress code, the signage stipulates that male visitors are expected to don shirts accompanied by neckties, opt for long pants, and wear closed shoes.

Conversely, female visitors are advised to don long-sleeved shirts, full-length skirts, and closed-toe footwear.

Perodua’s dress code sparks online uproar

Following the rapid spread of the post, Perodua’s official Facebook page found itself inundated with comments from both intrigued and frustrated Malaysian netizens, all seeking clarifications about the newly surfaced dress code policy.

Amidst the flurry of comments, numerous incensed netizens posed pointed questions such as, “What is the rationale behind the introduction of such regulations by the management? We demand an explanation.”

Another netizen expressed their dissatisfaction, arguing against the necessity of the rule and urging Perodua to take inspiration from the practices of other 4S (Sales, Service, Spare Parts, and Survey) automotive dealerships.

A concerned Facebook user chimed in, advocating for a more lenient stance, asserting that attempting to dictate customers’ clothing choices might not be in the company’s best interest.

Someone also commented in an angry tone, “Oi what is this? Going there for car service, not interview or working, right.”

As the discourse unfolded, it became evident that while some inquiries carried genuine weight, others chose to inject humor into the situation, playfully remarking, “If I wanted to buy a Myvi, I should buy or rent a formal attire first.”

“I sell economy rice at a hawker centre, I have never worn a long sleeve shirt and a tie… I guess I will not buy a Perodua car then.”

“I guess they will not serve those who wear short pants.”

Perodua addresses dress code controversy

As reported by Chinese media outlet Sin Chew Daily News, the manager of Kuantan’s Perodua Service Centre had acknowledged that the images on the dress code signage were misleading.

In response, the manager divulged that discussions had transpired with the head office, leading to the prompt removal of the signage to prevent any further misconceptions.

The manager clarifies, “We do encourage visitors to adhere to the dress etiquette, but we won’t go to the extent of restricting their choice of attire.”

He also revealed that currently, no complaints have been directly received from the public.

However, feedback from certain customers was relayed through Perodua’s agents.

Perodua also released an official statement by chief operating officer JK Rozman Jaffar on Wednesday (9 Aug) regarding the dress code on their official Facebook page.

The statement stated the dress code etiquette is not aligned with their official guidelines and they are currently conducting an official investigation on the matter followed by corrective measures to avoid the same incident from happening.

Perodua also extends its apologies for any inconvenience caused.

 

Continue Reading

Trending